Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CO pass 15 round mag limit

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CO pass 15 round mag limit

    Just the committee...final vote on Friday.

    A Colorado Senate committee on Monday passed a measure that bans ammunition magazines of more than 15 rounds after several hours of testimony from a barrage of experts, law enforcement officials and victims of mass shootings.

    House Bill 1224 passed on 3-2 party line vote and moves to the Senate floor on Friday.

    Sen. Mary Hodge, D-Brighton, the Senate sponsor of the bill, said several recent shooting sprees, including ones in Aurora and Newtown, Conn., were committed with gun magazines that held more than 15 rounds.

    "This bill is an attempt to reduce the slaughter," Hodge said.

    The bill — which also limits shotguns to having eight shells — passed through the House chamber by a 34-31 margin in February before moving on to the Senate.

    Those testifying in favor of the bill included Patricia Maisch, a woman who helped disable Jared Loughner, the shooter who killed six and wounded 13 people, including U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, outside a Tucson grocery story in January 2011. Also testifying in favor was Theresa Hoover, mother of A.J. Boik, a victim in the Aurora theater shooting.

    Meanwhile, Republicans balked at the measure.

    "These awful tragedies should be prevented, but there's a real deep disagreement as to how we get there," said Sen. Kevin Lundberg, R-Berthoud, who added that the right of ordinary citizens to defend themselves would be infringed.

    Supporters also included Jane Dougherty, sister of Mary Sherlach, the Sandy Hook Elementary School psychologist who was killed in the mass shooting that killed 20 children and six adults.

    "Simple arithmetic says a smaller magazine needs to be replaced more often than a larger magazine," said Dougherty, who said 11 children managed to escape death at Sandy Hook when the shooter had to change gun magazines.

    Republicans repeatedly questioned whether banning the larger capacity magazines would actually save lives.

    Republican senators saved special scrutiny for David Chipman, a former agent with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol and Firearms who testified in support of the bill. Chipman said the limit on magazine sizes would stop some shooters from becoming "killing machines."

    But Sen. Steve King, a Grand Junction Republican and a career police officer, tore into Chipman, asking him if he'd ever shot someone or been shot at.

    "I have not," Chipman said.

    Three Democrats and two Republicans sit on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which early Monday passed a bill that sets restrictions on access to firearms for domestic violence offenders.

    Both measures are among several pieces of stricter gun laws that the Democrats — who control both chambers at the Capitol and the governor's office — are proposing in the wake of several mass shootings in 2012.
    "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

  • #2
    Disappointing
    Originally posted by MR EDD
    U defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.

    Comment


    • #3
      I like how they limit it at 15 rounds.. I assume they are trying to give the impression that it is half of the common 30 round mag, ignoring the fact that the only thing already on the market that would comply is a 10 round.

      Then again, I guess they could be using that number to allow for most pistol mags.

      I'll still never get the magazine limitations. So I can only have 10 round magazines? Ok, just means I need more of those. If changing magazines slows you down much it just means you need more practice.

      Comment


      • #4
        I hope this persuades Magpul to move to Texas

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Chili View Post
          I like how they limit it at 15 rounds.. I assume they are trying to give the impression that it is half of the common 30 round mag, ignoring the fact that the only thing already on the market that would comply is a 10 round.

          Then again, I guess they could be using that number to allow for most pistol mags.

          I'll still never get the magazine limitations. So I can only have 10 round magazines? Ok, just means I need more of those. If changing magazines slows you down much it just means you need more practice.
          I hope if a ban passes here it is the same way. 15 rounds covers most pistols, and if I can't deal with a threat with 15 rounds of .40 or .223 I'll probably be dead anyway .
          2012 GT500

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Cobraman View Post
            I hope if a ban passes here it is the same way. 15 rounds covers most pistols, and if I can't deal with a threat with 15 rounds of .40 or .223 I'll probably be dead anyway .
            It isn't a matter of how many rounds can put down an attacker with, it's about how much fun I can have at the range. Ever shot a belt fed with 10 rounds? Well, I haven't but I bet it would be lame.
            Originally posted by lincolnboy
            After watching Games of Thrones, makes me glad i was not born in those years.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DOHCTR View Post
              It isn't a matter of how many rounds can put down an attacker with, it's about how much fun I can have at the range. Ever shot a belt fed with 10 rounds? Well, I haven't but I bet it would be lame.
              well I guess it depends on what your main purpose for your weapons is.
              2012 GT500

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Cobraman View Post
                I hope if a ban passes here it is the same way. 15 rounds covers most pistols, and if I can't deal with a threat with 15 rounds of .40 or .223 I'll probably be dead anyway .
                That doesn't matter, what does matter is that the legislators have no right to pass the bill in the first place.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
                  That doesn't matter, what does matter is that the legislators have no right to pass the bill in the first place.
                  for once, sean is the smartest man in a thread!


                  god bless.
                  It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men -Frederick Douglass

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Cobraman View Post
                    well I guess it depends on what your main purpose for your weapons is.
                    Only a few of my guns do I view as actual weapons for self protection.

                    Most are just for fun. Some for hunting, and a few play a double role of giving me the means to help protect myself from a tyrannical government.

                    Mag bans take away some protection from tyrannical government, and mag dumps with only 10/15 rounds is pretty boring.
                    "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"

                    -- Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      what now? your car cant have over 200hp because it would use too much gas? its the same point. its not even the guns its the messed up mind behind the gun. this country is crashing fast sad days ahead

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        We will see what happens on Friday.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          i'm never selling my 30 round glock mag

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by GrayStangGT View Post
                            I hope this persuades Magpul to move to Texas
                            The rumor is, South Carolina.
                            ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by YALE View Post
                              The rumor is, South Carolina.
                              Wyoming is what I heard.
                              Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X