Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I understand, but it's still annoying.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I understand, but it's still annoying.

    Neither one of them should be there. I don't understand why people are so desperate to make their beliefs known to total strangers wouldn't couldn't give a shit less.


    STARKE, Fla. (AP) — A group of atheists unveiled a monument to their nonbelief in God on Saturday to sit alongside a granite slab that lists the Ten Commandments in front of the Bradford County courthouse.

    As a small group of protesters blasted Christian country music and waved "Honk for Jesus" signs, the atheists celebrated what they believe is the first atheist monument allowed on government property in the United States.

    "When you look at this monument, the first thing you will notice is that it has a function. Atheists are about the real and the physical, so we selected to place this monument in the form of a bench," said David Silverman, president of American Atheists.

    It also serves another function — a counter to the religious monument that the New Jersey-based group wanted removed. It's a case of if you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

    American Atheists sued to try to have the stone slab with the Ten Commandments taken away from the courthouse lawn in this rural, conservative north Florida town best known for the prison that confines death row inmates. The Community Men's Fellowship erected the monument in what's described as a free speech zone. During mediation on the case, the atheist group was told it could have its own monument, too.

    "We're not going to let them do it without a counterpoint," Silverman said. "If we do it without a counterpoint, it's going to appear very strongly that the government actually endorses one religion over another, or — I should say — religion in general over non-religion."

    About 200 people attended the unveiling. Most were supportive, though there were protesters, including a group from Florida League of the South that had signs that said "Yankees Go Home."

    "We reject outsiders coming to Florida — especially from outside what we refer to as the Bible Belt — and trying to remake us in their own image," said Michael Tubbs, state chairman of the Florida League of the South. "We do feel like it's a stick in the eye to the Christian people of Florida to have these outsiders come down here with their money and their leadership and promote their outside values here."

    After a cover was taken off the 1,500-pound granite bench Saturday, people rushed to have their pictures taken on it. The bench has quotes from Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Madalyn Murray O'Hair, the founder of American Atheists. It also has a list of Old Testament punishments for violating the Ten Commandments, including death and stoning.

    "Some people think it's an attack simply by us exerting our existence. They put a monument on a public lawn that, if you put it in context, says atheists should be killed," Silverman said. "It is an attack, but it's an attack on Christian privilege, not an attack on Christians themselves, and not so much an attack on Christianity."

    At one point someone in a car driving by tossed a toilet seat and a roll of toilet paper at the crowd. Neither struck anyone. At another point, Eric Hovind, 35, of Pensacola jumped atop the peak of the monument and shouted his thanks to the atheists for giving him a platform to declare Jesus is real. Atheists shouted at him, and he stepped down after about a minute. One man yelled that religion is a fairy tale.

    "The problem is it's not a fairy tale," Hovind said. "We definitely have freedom of religion, not freedom from religion."

    Hovind and Tubbs did say they respect the right of the group to install the monument, even if they disagree with the message behind it.

    And the atheists said they expected protesters.

    "There always are," said Rick Wingrove, the director of a Washington D.C.-area office of American Atheists. "We protests their events, they protests our events. As long as everybody's cordial and let people speak. This is our day, not theirs. We're fine with them being here."

    A call to the group that sponsored the Ten Commandments monument, the Community Men's Fellowship, wasn't returned. But the group gave Facebook updates on the legal battle with the American Atheists and praised the compromise that allowed them to keep their monument.

    "We want you all to remember that this issue was won on the basis of this being a free speech issue, so don't be alarmed when the American Atheists want to erect their own sign or monument. It's their right. As for us, we will continue to honor the Lord and that's what matters," the group posted.

    While Silverman said he believes religion is wrong and teachings in the Bible are violent, he said he welcomes non-Christian religions to follow the atheists' example and put in their own monuments in free-speech zones.

    "I will back them because it will be their right," he said. "This is one of the tricks that Christians have used, because they go up and call it a free-speech zone and then they're unopposed. They get their government legitimization because nobody else calls their bluff and puts something in."

  • #2
    Tldrdgaf
    http://www.truthcontest.com/entries/...iversal-truth/

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by talisman View Post
      Neither one of them should be there.
      I agree. And Eric Hovind is a fucking idiot.

      Comment


      • #4
        What's funny and ironic is that both parties are saying, "You should live your life the way I say you should live your life," without seeing how selfish, self-centered, and self-righteous it is.

        These particular Christians try to convince people to live their way out of duty, and these particular Atheists try to convince the same people to live their way. They're pulling on the same tug-of-war rope. That's why they're both there. They don't realize they're pulling each other's puppet strings.

        I bet both parties would die before they'd say to each other, "You know, you might be right," or "You know, I could be wrong."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by BrianC View Post
          What's funny and ironic is that both parties are saying, "You should live your life the way I say you should live your life," without seeing how selfish, self-centered, and self-righteous it is.

          These particular Christians try to convince people to live their way out of duty, and these particular Atheists try to convince the same people to live their way. They're pulling on the same tug-of-war rope. That's why they're both there. They don't realize they're pulling each other's puppet strings.

          I bet both parties would die before they'd say to each other, "You know, you might be right," or "You know, I could be wrong."
          Having been on both sides of this situation, and seeing both sides as they are now. This is inaccurate, IMO.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by racrguy View Post
            Having been on both sides of this situation, and seeing both sides as they are now. This is inaccurate, IMO.
            You're probably right.

            Hope you didn't think I was commenting on all Atheists and all Christians. If so, I apologize. I was commenting on Christians and Atheists who make their living from their beliefs, like Hovind and the president of the Atheist organization.

            Billy Graham, several years after he retired, said that he'd been using the time to seek God's heart. He made statements that basically said everyone will be in Heaven in the end, that God redeems everyone. It's funny, but I came to the same conclusion logically and biblically when I stopped listening to anything or anyone, and got my ego out of it. I sought God's heart. And my later biblical research showed the same thing Billy Graham said (Pope John Paul II said it twice to foreign nations, as well). The Bible even says God is the one who draws people to Him, not us. So what did I need to fight for? What are these people fighting for? A paycheck? Maybe. Convictions? Maybe. I can't judge them. I was just throwing out a theory. My only purpose now can be to love others and help the less fortunate.

            Unknown to me, I used to try to "win souls" to feel more justified in my beliefs.

            And by the way, your location of "I am the Stig" is the bomb.
            Last edited by BrianC; 06-30-2013, 04:56 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Since you've experienced both sides, what's your take on why they do it?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by BrianC View Post
                Since you've experienced both sides, what's your take on why they do it?
                For both David Silverman and Eric Hovind it is business, they do make their living at it. However, Eric Hovind spreads lies to the ignorant and feeds off of it, David Silverman checks Eric, and others like him as much as he and his organization can and receive donations based off of those actions. These monuments shouldn't be there, and there was a court case to remove the 10 commandments, they were not able to get them removed, but they were able to get a monument installed, I view it as a check to Christian privilege, a petty one, but a check nonetheless.

                I can only speak for myself when I say that I do not want people to live "my way" if you mean that they deconvert. I only wish that they would keep their religion, and the rules that go along with it, to themselves. People are allowed to believe or not believe whatever they like. They are not allowed to dictate my actions based on those beliefs.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by racrguy View Post
                  For both David Silverman and Eric Hovind it is business, they do make their living at it. However, Eric Hovind spreads lies to the ignorant and feeds off of it, David Silverman checks Eric, and others like him as much as he and his organization can and receive donations based off of those actions. These monuments shouldn't be there, and there was a court case to remove the 10 commandments, they were not able to get them removed, but they were able to get a monument installed, I view it as a check to Christian privilege, a petty one, but a check nonetheless.

                  I can only speak for myself when I say that I do not want people to live "my way" if you mean that they deconvert. I only wish that they would keep their religion, and the rules that go along with it, to themselves. People are allowed to believe or not believe whatever they like. They are not allowed to dictate my actions based on those beliefs.
                  For the most part, I agree. I wasn't accusing you or the average atheist of wanting people to convert/deconvert to that way of belief. I was speaking specifically to those who make money at it. What I don't understand is the idea that someone is forcing religion on anyone. I never got that impression from how the US does things. I don't like when individuals do it, though. That, I understand.

                  I think A. S. Neill has the answer to why this happens.
                  Last edited by BrianC; 07-01-2013, 06:14 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by BrianC View Post
                    For the most part, I agree. I wasn't accusing you or the average atheist of wanting people to convert/deconvert to that way of belief.
                    Ok.
                    I was speaking specifically to those who make money at it.
                    Like any full time activist, they have to make a living at what they do, their desire to eat is great, but I think what gets them started is that they (I'm speaking of both sides in this instance) see something they don't like in the world and they start speaking out about it. One thing that really pisses me off is the lies spread. If you're going to argue for/against something, be honest.
                    What I don't understand is the idea that someone is forcing religion on anyone.
                    You don't see how someone is forcing their religion on others, or you don't understand why they do it?
                    I never got that impression from how the US does things.
                    Look at the recent bill that Governor Fair Hair signed making it legal to say Merry Christmas in school and avoid lawsuits. I do not know of a single instance where someone was sued for saying Merry Christmas.
                    I don't like when individuals do it, though. That, I understand.
                    Ok
                    I think A. S. Neill has the answer to why this happens.
                    I'm not familiar with him, but after a dive through wikipedia I don't see anything alarming.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by racrguy View Post
                      Ok.

                      Like any full time activist, they have to make a living at what they do, their desire to eat is great, but I think what gets them started is that they (I'm speaking of both sides in this instance) see something they don't like in the world and they start speaking out about it. One thing that really pisses me off is the lies spread. If you're going to argue for/against something, be honest.
                      I agree. People come from two different directions in life. People take action out of love or fear (most people out of fear, and they don't realize it). It takes a lot of psychology to map every action back to fear, but it can be done.

                      I can't say whether love or fear drives either of these organizations, but it's one or the other (usually fear).

                      I don't like the lying either. But here's the thing--some people truly do not believe they're lying. I know, because I've done it.

                      Science is a perfect example of this. Scientists will tell you that what they believed 25 years ago has been disproved now. And in another 25 years, much of what we believe will be disproved again. So, our scientists today truly believe what they share with us, and they're not lying. But they could be completely wrong about it till someone disproves them to their intellectual liking. I've seen it happy a lot. One of my wife's professors started every class by saying, "Forget what you learned about brain science last class. Everything has changed now." My wife's a very objective scientist and very good at her job. She keeps a very open mind because of professors like that who remind her that science keeps finding out it's wrong.

                      I've found that there's a ton I can't know unless I do the science experiments myself or, at very least, witness other people doing it and get a very honest, open explanation for what's going on in the research process so I can assess it to see if there are holes in it. Scientists often misinterpret results due to their current set of information in their head. They learn something new and suddenly, their conclusions no longer make sense. Happens a lot in science.

                      You don't see how someone is forcing their religion on others, or you don't understand why they do it?

                      Look at the recent bill that Governor Fair Hair signed making it legal to say Merry Christmas in school and avoid lawsuits. I do not know of a single instance where someone was sued for saying Merry Christmas.
                      I generally understand why people do it. And I don't like the reason why. But what I was saying is that I don't understand why people feel the government is forcing religion on them.

                      If the government passed a law telling me I have to be a Christian, then I'm being forced against my will. I believe that's wrong. But if the government passes a law protecting me from being sued for doing something Christian, I believe that's fine. It's protecting my freedom of religion.

                      I'll give a comparison. If a pastor leaves a Bible on a table hoping someone will read it, and an Atheist comes by and says, "You're pushing your beliefs on me," the Atheist has missed the point. No one made him pick up the Bible and read it. He just has an aversion to religion or Christianity or God, and gets offended when it's available. But no one forced him to read that Bible. He just feels like he's being forced, so he does something about it. I haven't seen any laws passed to force anyone to be any particular religion, so I don't understand why people think religion is being forced on them by the laws we pass. That's all I was saying. And the statement I just made doesn't apply to ever Atheist--just some. Same thing happens with Christians (or anyone of any religion, really).

                      I think they may have passed the law mentioned in the OP, because a lady in Florida sued her employer after she got fired for saying Merry Christmas when her employer asked her not to:



                      She probably should've just stopped saying Merry Christmas, because she did the same thing some Atheists do. She assumed her religious freedom or freedom of speech was being threatened/restricted. Really, though, all she was being asked to do was say something more sensitive so that people wouldn't get offended.

                      I'm not familiar with him, but after a dive through wikipedia I don't see anything alarming.
                      If you're Atheist, you'll love A.S. Neill's stuff. He talks about why people do things like this in his book Summerhill. A.S. Neill's stuff is great.

                      Sorry for the long posts. I tend to love to get down to the "why" behind people's actions, and I love to explore it with others and share what I learn. Posting wastes too much of my time, which is one of a few reasons I don't do it much anymore.
                      Last edited by BrianC; 07-03-2013, 09:40 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Damn, Brian. You fucked around and got laid back, dude. Also: LMAO @ Eric Hovind getting his slimy self in on some stuff like this. Big surprise.
                        ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by YALE View Post
                          Damn, Brian. You fucked around and got laid back, dude. Also: LMAO @ Eric Hovind getting his slimy self in on some stuff like this. Big surprise.
                          lol Yeah, I did get really laid back. Thanks for noticing. Makes me feel more at ease.

                          Love the "Grammar Nazi" emblem! I love to write.
                          Last edited by BrianC; 07-09-2013, 09:15 AM.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X