Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prince Rupert's Drops : SCIENCE

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prince Rupert's Drops : SCIENCE



    Vs .22
    "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

  • #2
    That's incredible.
    sigpic

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm wondering if they would have tied just one string towards the bulb and left the tail free if more of them would have survived the impact of the bullet. Has there been any testing done with a higher caliber?

      Comment


      • #4
        Love that guy's videos. He does a great job of making science accessible. I watch these with my 10yo all the time.

        Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
        I'm wondering if they would have tied just one string towards the bulb and left the tail free if more of them would have survived the impact of the bullet. Has there been any testing done with a higher caliber?
        My guess is that the vibrations from the hit would still cause the tail to crack, exploding the whole thing, but I don't know. I'm not a scientologist.



        giggle

        Comment


        • #5
          Price Rupert's Drop in Hydraulic Press




          Crazy

          Comment


          • #6
            I watched a bunch of these videos a few weeks ago and plan on doing a little science project with my son. The video of the press is pretty wild. 20 tons.
            Last edited by SBFORDTECH; 01-17-2017, 11:20 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              I saw this recently as well. Became quite interested in them. Then I went back to just wanting a good high speed camera.

              Comment


              • #8
                Make the drop with no tail. See if bullets will just bounce off forever. Make bullet proof vest from results.
                WH

                Comment


                • #9
                  How it's formed, and having the tail is what gives the Rupert's drop it's properties. If you drop a whole piece of glass into water like that, it'll crack, the inner glass has nowhere to go, as the outer glass cools and compresses on it.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Perhaps a modern process could be developed, which utilized the principles that makes the front so strong.

                    That one is from... what the 1500's? After all.
                    WH

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Gasser64 View Post
                      Perhaps a modern process could be developed, which utilized the principles that makes the front so strong.

                      That one is from... what the 1500's? After all.
                      Originally posted by Stanley Tweedle
                      Ok new idea. What about a separate 18hp lawnmower engine, rigged up to burn it's own gas and make it's own power, to run the alternator. Then the alternator is just hooked up to the car like normal. All under the hood. You just make sure your little lawnmower motor has gas, and you only run it when it's race day. The 5.0L engine exhaust could be loud enough to mask the lawnmower motor's noise, and you could also put a quiet exhaust system on the lawnmower motor.

                      Then, you can pump all the juice you want into that damn electric turbo, with no penalty to your main engine. Cause it ain't having to spin the high amp alternator you are going to need for this.
                      In the mind of Smegma Stench...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Gasser64 View Post
                        Perhaps a modern process could be developed, which utilized the principles that makes the front so strong.

                        That one is from... what the 1500's? After all.
                        No.



                        Prince Rupert's drops are an example of a tempered silica glass component: its surface has been cooled more rapidly than its interior. Tempering of glasses is important because it lends toughness to the glass, i.e. an ability to resist fracture under load, which explains why a drop can be hit with a hammer and survive. Silica glass, as is common with other ceramic materials, exhibits unstable crack propagation when its fracture strength is exceeded by its stress state. Unlike with most alloys, ceramics exhibit very little, or no, plastic deformation. When they reach their elastic limit they fracture. So if you stress a silica glass component too hard, it fractures rapidly and all at once.

                        A glass component may be tempered by cooling its exterior more rapidly than its interior so that there is a non-uniform residual stress distribution in the component. Specifically, because the exterior solidifies first, its density increases and volume decreases first, drawing material outward from the interior. Then, as the interior solidifies with less remaining material, it pulls inward on the exterior. The resulting stress state is tension in the interior and compression in the exterior.

                        Cracks only propagate when there is a tensile stress across the crack. If there is a residual compressive stress across the crack, it will remain closed unless stressed in tension. Because the compressive stress must be overcome before the crack opens, it takes a greater tensile stress to propagate a crack through a tempered glass component than an un-tempered component. If such a crack propagated past the neutral-stress surface between the exterior and interior of the component, the crack tip would be in tension due to the residual stress state of the interior. Such a crack would begin propagating in an unstable fashion as all of the residual stresses are released, resulting in an explosion of glass shards, as they all undergo elastic recovery from the non-uniform stress distribution.

                        From all of this, it should be apparent that a "perfectly" spherical, tempered glass component is theoretically possible, as it is only required that the exterior of the glass cools more rapidly than the interior to obtain the required non-uniform stress distribution, while maintaining the desired shape. A combination of gravity and viscosity are the cause of the tail in a traditional Prince Rupert's drop. Therefore, removing each of those components, such as with a drop formed in free-fall by free-surface surface-tension relaxation of a "floating" blob of glass, can result in a sphere of viscous glass. Relaxation may take a long time and the glass must be kept viscous the entire time. The next step is cooling the sphere rapidly without disturbing its shape, which is admittedly difficult. Spraying it with fluids would cause ripples in the surface, and submersion would require moving it infinitesimally slowly, which would cause the wrong kind of non-uniform stress distribution. Exposing it to the vacuum of space might be sufficient, but I haven't done any calculations of the radiated heat loss.

                        The desired setup would likely be a radiation oven in the vacuum of space, with a blob of glass floating in it, with no relative velocity. The oven melts the glass, which relaxes into a sphere. The oven is turned off, the door is opened and the oven moves rapidly away from the sphere. The sphere emits radiation, cooling the surface more rapidly than the interior (or so we hope), and the glass is tempered, resulting in a Prince Rupert's Space Drop
                        .

                        Prince Rupert's Drops are glass objects created by dripping molten glass into cold water. While the outside of the drop quickly cools, the inside remains hot for a longer time. When it eventually c...

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X