Woman Destroys Her New Car After Repo Man Wouldn't Let Her Car Go

[AnthonyS]

Let’s simplify this argument.

Let’s take payday loan places. It’s 100% legal, that doesn’t make it right or ethical. In fact excessive usury should be illegal. It’s economic enslavement, and enslavement is illegal right? Hell my current tax burden is unethical, unfair, and immoral but a bunch of lazy ass socialists think it’s great; so it’s ‘legal.’

SVO has a good argument even if it’s too damn wordy. The counter argument that it’s legal sucks. You can make shitting in public legal too, but making the smell a crime won’t change the result.

[Gasser64]

Difference is nobody made them buy the car. That's impossible. If these people would just decide to stop being stupid as fuck and go hunt down a quality car for a reasonable price, (even if it takes a while) they wouldn't have this problem. Or maybe they did that but they need to buy less cigarettes and beer. The point is, its all their fault. Doesn't really matter exactly how, in one way or another, its their fault. So fuck em.

My guess is, that the sting of a nice devastating repo, with all the pain and humiliation that comes with it, (I'd put bob's repo service on the side so all the neighbors would know) likely makes them wise up rather rapidly. If they are someone that does not learn pretty quickly from such things, then repossessions are going to be the very least of their worries in life.

Where are some of the car dealers? I know there are some (like warmachine iirc and dinger) who have had to repo stuff. I'm sure they can tell you all about the types of scumbags we're actually talking about here.

[svauto-erotic855]

Nullification usually only applies to special circumstances, takes more than one juror and is different than having your mind made up before the trial even starts.

It happens in any circumstance where a juror refuses to vote "Guilty" when the defendant is clearly guilty.

In the times I have decided to not vote for guilt I simply pick an obvious lie told by a state witness, point out that lie and say that if the DA would knowingly allow that to be said on the stand then I do not believe beyond a reasonable doubt that anything else said on the stand by any state witness is true. Since part of the jury charge instructs you to judge the credibility of the witnesses I stay perfectly in line with the law and the topic of "Nullification" never even comes up.

Edit: The most recent example of that was testimony from a finger print expert who said that 5 points was a match.

[JC316]

It happens in any circumstance where a juror refuses to vote "Guilty" when the defendant is clearly guilty.

In the times I have decided to not vote for guilt I simply pick an obvious lie told by a state witness, point out that lie and say that if the DA would knowingly allow that to be said on the stand then I do not believe beyond a reasonable doubt that anything else said on the stand by any state witness is true. Since part of the jury charge instructs you to judge the credibility of the witnesses I stay perfectly in line with the law and the topic of "Nullification" never even comes up.

Edit: The most recent example of that was testimony from a finger print expert who said that 5 points was a match.

And that's perfectly fine if you went in with an open mind, it's a perfectly logical reason to say not guilty. Going in with a clear bias, based solely on one's profession is the issue. It's like saying that no one should go to jail, just because a lot of people don't like cops. Again, I think you're either trolling, or completely full of shit.

Either way, both of our positions are clear, so nothing more can be added here.

[svauto-erotic855]

And that's perfectly fine if you went in with an open mind, it's a perfectly logical reason to say not guilty. Going in with a clear bias, based solely on one's profession is the issue. It's like saying that no one should go to jail, just because a lot of people don't like cops. Again, I think you're either trolling, or completely full of shit.

Either way, both of our positions are clear, so nothing more can be added here.

Someone awhile back dumped a bucket of gasoline on a lawyer and caught him on fire in his driveway. This was done somewhere in North Dallas but I can not remember the lawyers name. To the best of my knowledge the killer has never been caught. If I was on the jury for the killer in all likelihood I would find him guilty if the state held up their end, but I would be somewhat lenient in the sentencing phase because of the deceased person's profession. I kind of felt the same way about the DA's in Kaufman County that got blasted.

[Fatass]

You are one fucked individual.

[scootro]

You are one fucked individual.

i bet he's a fun friend to have! i enjoy his stories