confused on ron paul's foreign policy

[sc281]

Other weakness.

True, but I'll his weaknesses over Romneycare, Cap and Trade, and all the other bullshit the other candidates were for before they were against, any day.

If you don't want me voting for Paul, dig Calvin Coolidge out of his grave and put his ass on the ballot.

[Vertnut]

True, but I'll his weaknesses over Romneycare, Cap and Trade, and all the other bullshit the other candidates were for before they were against, any day.

If you don't want me voting for Paul, dig Calvin Coolidge out of his grave and put his ass on the podium.

Get a grip, man. Get down off that ledge! RP is just another politician.

[sc281]

Get a grip, man. Get down off that ledge! RP is just another politician.

Do you not get what I said in the previous post?

I supported almost everyone but him, because I thought about who's "more electable", but after seeing EACH and EVERY one of them, one after the other, lie to our faces, I got sick of hearing it.

He was my LAST choice.

I don't give a shit about Ron Paul. If there was another candidate that spoke about the Constitution and MEANT what he said, I'd vote for him in a minute.

Point him out to me, PLEASE!

You don't trust a Sleazy Used Car salesman not to fuck you on a car deaL, but you'll sure as hell vote him President, huh?

[crapstang]

I like the top comment "RONCEPTION."

[slow99]

You posted this:

I'll put it as simple as I can:

In it for themselves:
Obama
Romney
Gingrich
Santorum

In it for the Country:
Paul



Each have their problems, but whose problems am I more willing to put up with?

Paul, by a laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaandslide.

Then you're posting this:

We get the Government we vote for, so decide what kind of America you want to live in for yourself. The time of picking 'which one will fuck us the least' is over for me.

See you in hell, sir!

and this:

Do you not get what I said in the previous post?



He was my LAST choice.

I don't give a shit about Ron Paul. If there was another candidate that spoke about the Constitution and MEANT what he said, I'd vote for him in a minute.

Point him out to me, PLEASE!

You don't trust a Sleazy Used Car salesman not to fuck you on a car deaL, but you'll sure as hell vote him President, huh?

You're saying the same thing as Geor. "Not perfect, but better than X."

For the record, I'm not anti-Paul. I'll vote for the guy. I'm anti - "blind Paul-ites". Hell, I've seen it posted many times on this site that, "if you don't agree with RP, you're un-American". Lmao... horseshit.

Hell, jw33 posted that comment referring to Paul's stance on the Fed months ago. Then posted this week that he admits he isn't knowledgeable enough to have a fair opinion. Good God.

The RP die-hards are a big liability in my opinion. Anybody who posts a negative comment about RP here in the RP forum gets attacked. It doesn't mean you are "against" the man. I think he's the best available candidate right now...but he has HUGE problems with his monetary policy and ideas. I happen to know a whole lot about the subject, and it's my opinion that he's incorrect with a lot of his economic beliefs.

It means I'm objective and can recognize that nobody is perfect. We all have to go through the exercise of choosing whom we believe to be the best. His die-hards who deify the guy are doing nobody any favors...especially themselves.

[jyro]

Ron Paul

23 years in congress, 1 bill passed
That's not much for 23 years service.
Being able to predict the future and not being able to change it sure doesn't say much for the work he's done in the house in 23 years.
With his nearly exactly foreign policy in the late 30's we ended up with Hitler taking over Europe.

History repeats.

I'm not happy with the history we have now but RP is too radical. His inability in the House kind of proves it to me. I really like a lot of what he says but some of the other stuff sounds a little too much like Ross Perot.

[jw33]

Hey slow99, would you mind posting a detailed reply in the other thread? I'd like to hear your concerns, if any, about the current monetary policy. Its a very complicated and I've never claimed to be an expert on the subject however I do feel that Ron Paul makes a compelling argument that the money supply is a much more important aspect of our problems than it has been reported in the past.

[Treasure Chest]

Another thing I find ironic about Mr. Paul is how he's utterly against term limits and preaches to the heaves about smaller government when he's spent half of his adult life in elected office. His disciples like to overlook or completely dismiss that one.

He's FOR term limits. He's proposed legislation for term limits a few times, and they always get shot down.

[Treasure Chest]

His time spent in office shows otherwise, though I guess the supposed term limits he "supports" are the ones that either apply to others or that extend for the length of his tenure in office.

Does it make sense for a decent politician to self impose term limits and just turn the wheel completely over to politicians who are trying to run the country into the ground? If he's active, then he's actively trying to make a difference.

[-Jake-]

Seriously.

[Denny]

I just find it funny, sad rather, that most of you were making fun at the people who were voting "against Republicans" at any cost during the last election. Basically calling them "straight-ticket Nancies." Now it seems the tide has changed and this election is bringing out some hypocracy.

I'm told I don't know what the fuck I'm talking about and I'm a blind follower just because I support Paul. I have, in fact, justified my position on his foreign, monetary, social, etc. policies, yet I'm just a "blind follower."

There seem to be way too many Republican party blind followers on here to get a fucking clue. It is somewhat amusing to sit back and watch some of you regurgitate Fox News, as if you had a thought of your own.

[-Jake-]

I just find it funny, sad rather, that most of you were making fun at the people who were voting "against Republicans" at any cost during the last election. Basically calling them "straight-ticket Nancies." Now it seems the tide has changed and this election is bringing out some hypocracy.

I'm told I don't know what the fuck I'm talking about and I'm a blind follower just because I support Paul. I have, in fact, justified my position on his foreign, monetary, social, etc. policies, yet I'm just a "blind follower."

There seem to be way too many Republican party blind followers on here to get a fucking clue. It is somewhat amusing to sit back and watch some of you regurgitate Fox News, as if you had a thought of your own.

I used to be a more or less straight R voter. My eyes have been opened, not anymore. Check out who voted for NDAA. Seriously look it up, and republicans are for smaller government? Wake up people.

Just last night Romney was claiming he is pro-life, I'm not even going to attempt to post all the videos of him claiming to be pro-choice. He even went so far as to say he had a close relative who died from an illegal abortion so he is all for legal abortions. He is as slimy as they come.

[Avery'sDad]

I just find it funny, sad rather, that most of you were making fun at the people who were voting "against Republicans" at any cost during the last election. Basically calling them "straight-ticket Nancies." Now it seems the tide has changed and this election is bringing out some hypocracy.

I'm told I don't know what the fuck I'm talking about and I'm a blind follower just because I support Paul. I have, in fact, justified my position on his foreign, monetary, social, etc. policies, yet I'm just a "blind follower."

There seem to be way too many Republican party blind followers on here to get a fucking clue. It is somewhat amusing to sit back and watch some of you regurgitate Fox News, as if you had a thought of your own.

Wholly hell Denny, that is spot on.
My voting stance is this

Ron Paul then
Obama then
None of the other candidates.

obligatory picture:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OgK9DVR0iNg/TxCjTh674pI/AAAAAAAAAoc/4mNj0oeOslU/s1600/bain.jpg

[Vertnut]

Wholly hell Denny, that is spot on.
My voting stance is this

Ron Paul then
Obama then
None of the other candidates.

obligatory picture:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-OgK9DVR0iN...s1600/bain.jpg

I guess they share liberal foreign policies? What else would be the connection? No hope here...

[-Jake-]

I guess they share liberal foreign policies? What else would be the connection? No hope here...

Who do you support?