Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

And there was much rejoicing in the land.... Gas Prices

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • new tech update

    Roman Abramovich Invests $15M In New US Fracking Technology

    Are the Russians coming to Texas riding the tailwinds of fracking? That depends on who you ask, as some believe Russian forces were behind the anti-fracking vote in Denton, while a $15 million investment in new Texas fracking technology by Roman Abramovich perhaps tells another story.

    When the anti-fracking campaign started to heat up late last year in Denton, Texas—the heart of the shale revolution—conspiracy theories were spread from within the pro-fracking community that the Russians were behind the whole thing. The logic was that the American shale revolution threatened Russia’s market share.

    Yet just months after a successful vote to ban fracking in Denton, Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich has invested $15 million in Houston-based Propell Technologies Group, Inc. (OTC:PROP) and its new fracking technology from wholly owned subsidiary Novas Energy. Significantly, this new enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology enables ‘clean’ hydraulic micro/nano fracturing of oil reservoirs—that is, without water, without polluting chemicals and without earthquakes.

    According to Propell, the Plasma Pulse patented downhole tool creates a controlled plasma arc within a vertical well, generating a tremendous amount of heat for a fraction of a second. The subsequent high-speed hydraulic impulse wave emitted is strong enough to remove any clogged sedimentation from the perforation zone without damaging steel. The series of impulse waves/vibrations also penetrate deep into the reservoir causing nano fractures in the matrix which increase reservoir permeability for up to a year per treatment.

    In the die-hard conspiracy theorist community—particularly in the latest ‘Cold War’ atmosphere the media has latched onto once again—there will be continued rumors of Russian scheming here. Some might say that the Russians laid the foundation for a ‘no’ vote on fracking and then swooped in to invest in ‘clean’ fracking technology.

    It may or may not be a coincidence that Propell’s Plasma Pulse Technology is licensed from Novas Energy, a venture capital-backed Russian energy technology company.

    There is also another Russian element to this: PPT has been very successfully employed in Russian injector wells. This is perhaps the most significant aspect to consider. Russia does not have draconian fracking regulations pressuring companies to use environmentally friendly technology. Instead, they are using PPT to improve enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and reduce production costs.

    Conspiracy or not, Abramovich does nothing small or half-heartedly.

    Abramovich is a metals magnate who also happens to own the Chelsea football club. He is the 143rd wealthiest person in the world and is worth about $9 billion, according to Forbes. He is the main owner of UK-registered Millhouse LLC, a private investment company whose assets have included major stakes in stakes in Sibneft, which is now Gazprom Neft. In 2005, Millhouse sold a 72% stake in Sibneft to Gazprom for more than $13 billion.

    Abramovich has now invested in Propell’s PPT. The investor is Cyprus-registered Ervington Investments Limited, whose ultimate beneficial owner is Abramovich.

    “This will not merely be a $15 million investment,” said one source close to the deal. “You have to read between the lines here. Abramovich doesn’t do anything small. He’ll get the infrastructure in place and then look to acquire a significant position in the US oil sector at today’s fire sale prices. We’ll probably be looking at hundreds of millions in investment at the end of the day.”

    An anonymous source with knowledge of the deal said that an initial $5 million of the $15 million investment would be working capital, while $10 million would be for acquisition of oilfields. The overall idea is to apply EOR technology and double the output with Plasma Pulse technology.

    For Abramovich, this deal is not merely a whim: The billionaire is a strategic investor who has quite profitably invested in a number of energy technology companies. Abramovich—again through Ervington--is the largest shareholder in AIM-listed AFC Energy, which is working to commercialize clean fuel cell technology. He has also invested in Oxford Catalysts, which is close to commercializing the GreenSky London Project to supply renewable jet fuel made from London’s household waste. The system is to be used by British Airways to create fuel for its planes. London-based Weedingtech—which makes herbicide-free weed killer—and AIM-listed Clean Air Power are also among Abramovich’s strategic energy investments.

    The Propell investment may be the most strategic—on two fronts.

    On the first front, we have increasing controversy surrounding fracking in the US.

    While Denton, for instance, is just a small town and the ban on fracking is only within the city limits, this small-town vote has much larger implications. This was where the shale revolution kicked off, and banning fracking here could snowball and empower other anti-fracking movements and efforts.

    The state of California is also gearing up for stringent new regulations that are set to take effect in July.

    Plasma Pulse Technology foregoes toxic chemicals and harnesses plasma pulses that would once have been reminiscent of science fiction weaponry. It may indeed be a weapon of sorts—one that could bring the industry and environmentalists together finally.

    PPT is deemed to be an environmentally friendly way to clear clogging sedimentation from well drainage areas to allow the oil and gas to flow. The technology uses vibrations, or electrically generated plasma impulses to reduce viscosity, increase permeability and improve the flow of oil and gas to the surface for extraction.

    And this is where we find the ‘second front’: The technology is not only designed to be environmentally friendly; it is also designed to increase production and reduce production costs.

    After all, Abramovich isn’t looking to spend an initial $15 million on an investment that is strictly friendly to the environment—there has to be more, and it would appear that there is.

    This is all about enhanced oil recovery (EOR), and plasma pulse technology is one way to improve EOR processes to get even more oil and gas out of the ground.

    The average increase in production for the initial 27 US wells treated with plasma pulse technology is 295%. The company is also reportedly working versions of its plasma pulse tool for horizontal shale wells and much shallower water wells as well.

    Abramovich will be getting in very early in this game, which would allow him—for instance--to comply with California’s new anti-fracking bill and its tight restrictions on acid washing for injector wells. The regulations will have a profound effect on key producers in the area, such as Chevron Corp. (NYSE:CVX), ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) and Occidental Petroleum (NYSE:OXY), who will have to go through a long and costly permit process for each individual acid wash procedure. If they employ plasma pulse technology, however, they comply with the water-injector cleaning restrictions that kick in July 1. In California, major oil and gas companies are already paying $20,000 a pop for PPT pilot tests, according to our industry sources.

    What Abramovich sees is brilliant math here. Plasma Pulse technology could easily turn into a $1 million/week business just in the state of California, and as anti-fracking gains momentum countrywide, these millions turn into billions. The Russian billionaire also sees a new technology that is not experimental, but already commercially viable.

    When Abramovich makes a new investment, everyone pays attention. So many will be asking why a Russian is investing in this Houston-based technology. The answer is simple and all about the bottom line. This ‘clean’ fracking technology could storm the market. Abramovich thinks so, and he has been wildly successful.

    It will be hard for the conspiracy theorists to digest, but for the investor looking for the next big thing, it goes down pretty smoothly, from Russia with ... a great deal of pragmatism.
    Last edited by Strychnine; 08-12-2015, 01:31 PM.

    Comment


    • I would love for a technology to displace traditional water based fracing. Imagine the amount of watersaved this way.

      Not just that...but also significant drop in harsh chemicals and disposal wells.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
        I would love for a technology to displace traditional water based fracing. Imagine the amount of watersaved this way.
        There's technology out there to generate water from ambient air. There are a few "counter top" versions of these things available on the market for residential use (5 gal/day), but one company has started looking into oil and gas applications. They are currently scaling up industrial water generation technology to go from 616 gallons/day in 90% humidity (280 gal/day in 60%) to 20,000 gallon/day capability. That could make a sizable dent in the water resource depletion arguments O&G face if they can work it out economically.
        Last edited by Strychnine; 08-12-2015, 01:51 PM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Strychnine View Post
          There's technology out there to generate water from ambient air. There are a few "counter top" versions of these things available on the market for residential use, but one company has started looking into oil and gas applications. They are currently scaling up their technology to go from 616 gallons/day in 90% humidity (280 gal/day in 60%) to 20,000 gallon/day capability. That could make a sizable dent in the water resource depletion arguments O&G face if they can work it out economically.
          You must have listened to a good dehumidifier salesman lol. It will still pull resources from environment by droping the humidity thus speeding up evaporation. It also wouldnt do much in the way of helping waste disposal and contamination. So its not necessarily a cost saver either.


          But the first tech you posted saves water, cuts down on the need for disposal wells and reduces a lot of the trucking/transportation associated with the frac process (proppant, water, disposal...etc).

          Comment


          • Man you got me all excited. I just read about this and its just an intervention tool for cleanup. Not a frac replacement.

            DAMN YOU!!!!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View Post
              Man you got me all excited. I just read about this and its just an intervention tool for cleanup. Not a frac replacement.

              DAMN YOU!!!!
              LOL. You got further than me. I went back to writing papers about the future of arctic drilling and about the results of Colorado's oil and gas legislation taskforce sessions.

              Comment


              • Down 7 tomorrow.

                Comment


                • Also...i think Canada will crash harder than normal when the drilling season comes to a close. It aint coming back to normal in 2016.

                  Comment


                  • Supply is still going up...

                    OPEC on Tuesday raised its forecast of oil supplies from non-member countries in 2015, a sign that crude's price collapse is taking longer than expected to hit U.S. shale drillers and other competing sources.

                    In a monthly report, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) forecast no extra demand for its crude oil this year despite faster global growth in consumption, because of higher-than-expected production from the United States and other countries outside the group.
                    Demand is rising quickly, but apparently still not enough fast enough...

                    IEA sees oil glut enduring in 2016 after reaching 17-year high

                    Record inventories will expand further even as consumption climbs by the most in five years in 2015 and supplies outside OPEC contract next year for the first time since 2008, the IEA predicted. Stockpiles won’t be diminished until the fourth quarter of 2016, or later if sanctions on Iranian crude are lifted following last month’s nuclear deal, the agency said.

                    My guess is the US count will rise again today just because rig count trails price by a bit and there was a bit of an upward trend, but it will fall again over the next couple weeks after the beating WTI has taken this month.




                    More from the latest IEA report:

                    1. "Lower For Longer" Consensus

                    “Oil’s plunge below $50 barrels a day from triple digits a year ago has seen demand react more swiftly than supply...Against this backdrop, many participants in the oil industry have adopted a new mantra – ‘lower for longer’,” the IEA said.
                    Global oil demand this year will rise at more than twice the pace last year as low oil prices catalyze consumption in the US and economies recover, the agency noted.
                    "Global oil demand in 2015 is expected to grow by 1.6 M/bpd, up 0.2 M/bpd from our previous report and the fastest pace in five years, as economic growth solidifies and and consumers respond to lower oil prices," the agency said. Additionally, "Persistent macro-economic strength" supports above-trend growth of 1.4 M/bpd next year.
                    But although world demand is projected to rise, the IEA said that world oil supply also continues to grow at "breakneck speed" - currently standing at 2.7 M/bpd above a year earlier – despite the fall in oil prices.


                    2. Oil Consumption Estimate Increased

                    Global oil consumption will expand by 1.6 M/bpd in 2015 to average 94.2 M/bpd, the IEA said.
                    The agency also raised its estimate for oil consumption in 2016, forecasting growth of 1.4 M/bpd to total 95.6 M/bpd - representing an increase of 400,000 bpd from the previous report.

                    3. Global Supply Falls On Lower Non-OPEC Production

                    The IEA noted that global oil supply dropped almost 600,000 bpd last month, "mainly on lower non-OPEC output." The agency sees the growth rate of non-OPEC oil supply as continuing to decline into next year.
                    "As lower prices and spending cuts take a toll, non-OPEC supply growth is expected to slow sharply from a 2014 record of 2.4 M/bpd to 1.1 M/bpd this year, and then contract by 200 kb/d in 2016."
                    "While a drop in costs and efficiency improvements will help to offset some of the spending cuts, output is likely to take a hit soon. As such, non-OPEC supply growth is expected to decelerate through the end of the year and decline in 2016 – with the US hardest hit."


                    4. Oil Glut To Persist Into 2016

                    Global oversupply will average 1.4 M/bpd in 2H15, exerting pressure on available storage capacity, before easing to approximately 850,000 bpd next year, the IEA projected. The production surplus in 2Q15 was the highest in 17 years- at 3 M/bpd, it said.
                    The IEA forecasts that record inventories will continue to "pile up," even as consumption growth doubles this year and non-OPEC supply contracts in 2016 for the first time since 2008. Stockpiles will not be diminished until 4Q16, or possibly even later, if sanctions on Iranian oil are rescinded, the report said.
                    "Our latest forecast shows stronger-than-anticipated demand and non-OPEC supply growth swinging into contraction next year. While a rebalancing has clearly begun, the process is likely to be prolonged as a supply overhang is expected to persist through 2016 - suggesting global inventories will pile up further."


                    5. OPEC Keeps Pedal To The Metal

                    The IEA says that OPEC supply, and particularly "muscular pumping" from Saudi Arabia and Iraq) would continue to increase, to 30.8 M/bpd in 2016, up 1.4 M/bpd on this year "due to a stronger demand outlook and stalling non-OPEC supply growth."
                    OPEC maintained production near a three-year high at 31.79 M/bpd last month, as record Iraqi output helped offset a pullback by Saudi Arabia, the report said.
                    The agency increased estimates for the amount of oil needed from OPEC next year by 600,000 bpd to 30.8 M/bpd. This is still approximately 1 M/bpd lower than current production.
                    Significantly, Iran could raise output to 3.6 M/bpd from roughly 2.9 million currently “within months” of sanctions being rescinded, the IEA said.
                    Last edited by Strychnine; 08-14-2015, 09:22 AM.

                    Comment


                    • And with WTI at $42, I read this:

                      GUNDLACH: If oil goes to $40 a barrel, something is 'very, very wrong with the world'

                      West Texas Intermediate crude oil is at a six-year low of $43 a barrel. And back in December, "bond king" Jeff Gundlach had a serious warning for the world if oil prices got to $40 a barrel.

                      "I hope it does not go to $40," Gundlach said in a presentation, "because then something is very, very wrong with the world, not just the economy. The geopolitical consequences could be — to put it bluntly — terrifying."

                      Writing in The Telegraph last week, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard noted that with Brent crude oil prices — the international benchmark — below $50 a barrel, only Norway's government was bringing in enough revenue to balance its budget this year.

                      And so in addition to the potential global instability created by low oil prices, Gundlach added, "If oil falls to around $40 a barrel, then I think the yield on 10-year Treasury note is going to 1%." The 10-year note, for its part, closed near 2.14% on Tuesday.

                      On December 9, WTI was trading near $65 a barrel and Gundlach said oil looked as if it was going lower, quipping that oil would find a bottom when it starts going up. WTI eventually bottomed at $43 in mid-March and spend most all of the spring and early summer trading near $60. On Tuesday, WTI hit a fresh six-year low, plunging more than 4% and trading below $43 a barrel. In the past month, crude and the entire commodity complex have rolled over again as the market battles oversupply and a Chinese economy that slowing.

                      And all this as the Federal Reserve makes noise about raising interest rates, having some in the market asking whether these external factors — what the Fed would call "exogenous" factors — will stop the Fed from changing its interest-rate policy for the first time in over almost seven years.

                      In an afternoon email, Russ Certo, a rate strategist at Brean Capital, highlighted Gundlach's comments and said the linkages between the run-up, and now collapse, in commodity prices since the financial crisis have made, quite simply, for an extremely complex market environment right now. "There is a global deleveraging occurring in front of our eyes," Certo wrote. "And, I suppose, the smart folks will determine the exact causes and translate what that means for FUTURE investment thesis. Today it may not matter other than accurately anticipating a myriad of global price movements in relation to each other."

                      Comment


                      • Thats what i keep telling the wife...that if its too low too long...well have a geopolitical conflict to bump up prices and surge our defense industry.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Strychnine View Post
                          And with WTI at $42, I read this:
                          At least we are still frac'ing...well we were until Wireline's crane got hit by lightning 30 minutes ago.

                          Supposedly we have contracts on 19 more wells all within a half mile from each other here in Oklahoma. The new thing though is zipper fracs and one pad for multiple sets if wells. Anything to cut the operating expenses. As long as we can stay busy, I am okay with it. Zippers just mean zero time between stages and making every move on the pad count.
                          Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

                          Comment


                          • Net change in US rig count this week was zero.
                            Oil directed rigs +2, gas directed rigs -2.

                            Comment


                            • $2.13 diesel in burly
                              DE OPPRESSO LIBER

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by HarrisonTX View Post
                                $2.13 diesel in burly
                                racetrack on wednesday, filled up for 2.16
                                "If I asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses." - Henry Ford

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X