Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

union loses in wisconsin

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by SaTx04Lightning View Post
    it appears to me they took away a person right to belong to a union....if more states pick up on this...its gonna be bad for lots of workers because a union fights for your rights as a worker...if they don't no one will.
    You're missing the point. Unions have evolved from working for the worker's rights to a mafia-type big business and creating a workforce of lazy clock watchers, demanding entitlements.We have labor laws and tons of work place regulations nowadays anyway.

    Comment


    • #17
      Passed

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by SaTx04Lightning View Post
        it appears to me they took away a person right to belong to a union....if more states pick up on this...its gonna be bad for lots of workers because a union fights for your rights as a worker...if they don't no one will.
        No...didn't take away a "right" to join a union. They can still join a union. What it did was kill the union's ability to force negotiations on the state for "work place safety" and the benefits packages (i.e. pension and health). Now *gasp* the employees of the company (in this case the state) have to agree with whatever benefits are offered or go get your own. You know, LIKE THE REST OF US!!!

        Where as before, the union would strong arm the state into giving it whatever it wanted.
        "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

        Comment


        • #19
          I wonder what's next? Fire Fighters, Police Officers, Rail Road and Airline Workers? All in the name of _______? Be careful what you wish for because you just might get it. The list can go on and on on what local, state and Federal Government can use against its citizens to infringe upon their rights.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by 564826 View Post
            I wonder what's next? Fire Fighters, Police Officers, Rail Road and Airline Workers? All in the name of _______? Be careful what you wish for because you just might get it. The list can go on and on on what local, state and Federal Government can use against its citizens to infringe upon their rights.
            Rights? More like public sector workers holding the taxpayers hostage.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by 564826 View Post
              I wonder what's next? Fire Fighters, Police Officers, Rail Road and Airline Workers? All in the name of _______? Be careful what you wish for because you just might get it. The list can go on and on on what local, state and Federal Government can use against its citizens to infringe upon their rights.
              Originally posted by Denny View Post
              Rights? More like public sector workers holding the taxpayers hostage.
              No kidding? How are benefits a "right"??

              Again, firefighters, police, etc can contribute to their own retirement and healthcare, like me.
              "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by 564826 View Post
                I wonder what's next? Fire Fighters, Police Officers, Rail Road and Airline Workers? All in the name of _______? Be careful what you wish for because you just might get it. The list can go on and on on what local, state and Federal Government can use against its citizens to infringe upon their rights.
                Do you mean the right to negotiate with a public official while simultaneously bribing him?

                I'm a little tired of public unions having that "right" myself. If shit like that goes on in the private sector, a company doesn't steal the food from the mouthes of people's children to fund their losses.
                Originally posted by racrguy
                What's your beef with NPR, because their listeners are typically more informed than others?
                Originally posted by racrguy
                Voting is a constitutional right, overthrowing the government isn't.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by 564826 View Post
                  I wonder what's next? Fire Fighters, Police Officers, Rail Road and Airline Workers? All in the name of _______? Be careful what you wish for because you just might get it. The list can go on and on on what local, state and Federal Government can use against its citizens to infringe upon their rights.
                  Is this the same kind of right like issued by the government to people that don't want to work, collect food stamps and a government check each month and it increases with every child they have?
                  If that is the case, how about we all just get these rights and have the country go belly up in debt because the individual cant make it on his own with out their government rights.

                  Wow, grow some balls and learn to stand on your own too feet without government intervention.

                  Our rights are defined in the constitution, not in socialist programs.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
                    Do you mean the right to negotiate with a public official while simultaneously bribing him?

                    I'm a little tired of public unions having that "right" myself. If shit like that goes on in the private sector, a company doesn't steal the food from the mouthes of people's children to fund their losses.
                    Its called money laundering, the public unions and democrats have gotten quite use to it.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
                      Do you mean the right to negotiate with a public official while simultaneously bribing him?

                      I'm a little tired of public unions having that "right" myself. If shit like that goes on in the private sector, a company doesn't steal the food from the mouthes of people's children to fund their losses.
                      “When school children start paying union dues, that's when I'll start representing the interests of school children.”
                      Albert Shanker - President of the United Federation of Teachers [1964-1984] & the American Federation of Teachers [1974-1997]


                      Fuck 'em in the neck.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by SaTx04Lightning View Post
                        it appears to me they took away a person right to belong to a union....if more states pick up on this...its gonna be bad for lots of workers because a union fights for your rights as a worker...if they don't no one will.
                        How much do you actually know about the modern labor laws in this country? I would be a proponent for unions if this were 1910. Its not. Today we have something called OSHA and other such institutions that make unions just plain unnecessary. Now tack on all the corruption and greed, and unions just need to go cause their time is long over.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          initially this whole thing was about saving money, taking a little out of the employee pension and a little out of their healthcare benefits, all with the intention of saving the state some money. what they passed the other night, did not include any of this, it just put an end to some collective bargaining, so its not saving them any money.
                          Last edited by Cannonball996; 03-11-2011, 11:40 AM.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Ok and what do you think the reason behind that was? So they can actually get to that part. If you don't take away the bargaining, there is nothing you can do in that regard. You gotta do that first.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              It didn't end collective bargaining. Read it
                              I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View Post
                                Ok and what do you think the reason behind that was? So they can actually get to that part. If you don't take away the bargaining, there is nothing you can do in that regard. You gotta do that first.
                                the reasoning was to save money now, this just helps them down the road. originally this legislation was meant to save the state about 30 million dollars, which they desperately need right now.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X