FCC Chairman's Proposal Will Radically Change The Rules Of The Internet

[CexMashean]

We're not in North Korea, so as far as internet usage goes, I have high hopes.

[matts5.0]

sad thing is, none of us really know how this works, some of you just have more faith in government than others.

[juiceweezl]

Sure, we don't know what exactly is in the bill. However we know what it does. The internet is now a "public utility" and the FCC has 100% oversight. So that group of 5 (the vote was 3/2 btw so completely partisan) will get to decide what fair access is and how to punish people that don't play along with their rules.

Just as a hypothetical situation look at Fox news and MSNBC. Fox has 9x the viewers as MSNBC and a lot of that traffic is streamed over the internet. Someone with the FCC may be able to decide that it's not fair to let Fox have that much more influence so they redirect traffic to MSNBC instead.

Or hey Texas is using way more bandwidth than California, lets shut their access off for a few hours while Obama talks about gun control to even things out.

Sure it sounds far fetched but before Obama I didn't think the IRS would be used to influence elections. Anytime there are presidential appointees in control of something I get nervous.

I had to quote all of this in one place. Too funny not to do so.

[CexMashean]

Just as a hypothetical situation look at Fox news and MSNBC. Fox has 9x the viewers as MSNBC and a lot of that traffic is streamed over the internet. Someone with the FCC may be able to decide that it's not fair to let Fox have that much more influence so they redirect traffic to MSNBC instead.

Or hey Texas is using way more bandwidth than California, lets shut their access off for a few hours while Obama talks about gun control to even things out.

[big_tiger]

Sure, we don't know what exactly is in the bill. However we know what it does. The internet is now a "public utility" and the FCC has 100% oversight. So that group of 5 (the vote was 3/2 btw so completely partisan) will get to decide what fair access is and how to punish people that don't play along with their rules.

Just as a hypothetical situation look at Fox news and MSNBC. Fox has 9x the viewers as MSNBC and a lot of that traffic is streamed over the internet. Someone with the FCC may be able to decide that it's not fair to let Fox have that much more influence so they redirect traffic to MSNBC instead.

Or hey Texas is using way more bandwidth than California, lets shut their access off for a few hours while Obama talks about gun control to even things out.

Sure it sounds far fetched but before Obama I didn't think the IRS would be used to influence elections. Anytime there are presidential appointees in control of something I get nervous.

[BP]

Sure, we don't know what exactly is in the bill. However we know what it does. The internet is now a "public utility" and the FCC has 100% oversight. So that group of 5 (the vote was 3/2 btw so completely partisan) will get to decide what fair access is and how to punish people that don't play along with their rules.

Just as a hypothetical situation look at Fox news and MSNBC. Fox has 9x the viewers as MSNBC and a lot of that traffic is streamed over the internet. Someone with the FCC may be able to decide that it's not fair to let Fox have that much more influence so they redirect traffic to MSNBC instead.

Or hey Texas is using way more bandwidth than California, lets shut their access off for a few hours while Obama talks about gun control to even things out.

Sure it sounds far fetched but before Obama I didn't think the IRS would be used to influence elections. Anytime there are presidential appointees in control of something I get nervous.

[mustang_revival]

Here is some summary.

http://www.cnet.com/news/net-fix-8-burning-questions-about-net-neutrality/

http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IF/IF16/20150225/103018/HHRG-114-IF16-20150225-SD002-U1.pdf

[no4njnk]

I think some people here aren't really understanding what this is actually about.

From what I have heard only 5 or so people have read the 300+ page bill. A lot of crap will be stuffed in there.

[Denny]

I think some people here aren't really understanding what this is actually about.

None of us do, fully. Welcome to the club.

[CexMashean]

I think some people here aren't really understanding what this is actually about.

[BP]

I hope I am wrong, but short of the military and CIA I cannot think of much the federal government has gotten right or made better.

We spend $630 billion a year on our military. That's with a fleet of B-2s, F-16s, F-22s, 12 active carrier groups and who knows how many subs already produced. I'm not sure they've gotten it right. Especially since we can't even use most of it.

The CIA is supposed to work in secret, the fact that we know what they are doing and they have to testify in front of congress tells me they aren't doing a good job.

The only thing our government is really good at is spending money. Sure they've kept us from being invaded for a long time and we've made lots of middle eastern countries wealthy but pretty much anything the government gets involved with results in massive amounts of paperwork, stifled technology and higher prices for the people that actually pay for it.

[CexMashean]

The internet will be the same.

That's you opinion, and you're entitled to it.

[LANTIRN]

The FCC finally did something right. Amazing.

The government turns almost everything they touch to shit. Anything that was halfway working before pretty much stops once they get their hands on it. The internet will be the same. In a few years those of us who have been saying this about this new ruling or reclassification or whatever it is they are calling it will unfortunately be proven right. I hope I am wrong, but short of the military and CIA I cannot think of much the federal government has gotten right or made better.

[CexMashean]

The FCC finally did something right. Amazing.

[exlude]

Why do you even bother, dude? You're wasting time that you'll never get back on a moron.

It's entertaining, that's about it.