Originally posted by mschmoyer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Global warmed up: Study finds temperature data systematically fudged upward
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by mschmoyer View PostWhy not put in writing what is already happening? Adds a little accountability if it suddenly turns un-profitable. Push industry to forge ahead just a little faster. Show that the country/gov't is committed to the idea.
Alternatively, if we just took that stack of cash and dumped it straight into education and science R&D here in the states, I'd be happy. Obviously not what's going to happen.
There's a profit to be made in "renewable energy", so let industry have at it so the politicians can focus on the "important" things like Transgenders in the Military and the California Delta Smelt.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Strychnine View PostWhy do we need an "accord" if the free market seems to be doing just fine on its own?
https://qz.com/1024520/renewable-ene...ump-withdraws/
Alternatively, if we just took that stack of cash and dumped it straight into education and science R&D here in the states, I'd be happy. Obviously not what's going to happen.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mschmoyer View PostWe could have created the "US Accord".
Renewable energy is becoming so cheap the US will meet Paris commitments even if Trump withdraws
Research analysts at Morgan Stanley believe that renewable energy like solar and wind power are hurtling towards a level of ubiquity where not even politics can hinder them. Renewable energy is simply becoming the cheapest option, fast. Basic economics, the analysts say, suggest that the US will exceed its commitments in the Paris agreement regardless of whether or not president Donald Trump withdraws, as he’s stated he will.
“We project that by 2020, renewables will be the cheapest form of new-power generation across the globe,” with the exception of a few countries in Southeast Asia, the Morgan Stanley analysts said in a report published Thursday.
“By our forecasts, in most cases favorable renewables economics rather than government policy will be the primary driver of changes to utilities’ carbon emissions levels,” they wrote. “For example, notwithstanding president Trump’s stated intention to withdraw the US from the Paris climate accord, we expect the US to exceed the Paris commitment of a 26-28% reduction in its 2005-level carbon emissions by 2020.”
Globally, the price of solar panels has fallen 50% between 2016 and 2017, they write. And in countries with favorable wind conditions, the costs associated with wind power “can be as low as one-half to one-third that of coal- or natural gas-fired power plants.” Innovations in wind-turbine design are allowing for ever-longer wind blades; that boost in efficiency will also increase power output from the wind sector, according to Morgan Stanley.
Even in Australia, where the political climate is hostile to renewables, Morgan Stanley sees hope in the slightly longer-term: “In Australia, we anticipate that by 2020, renewables will provide ~28% of grid-supplied energy, including over 60% in South Australia.”
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mschmoyer View PostVoid of paying anything until 2030 is not accurate.
That was an aside. My 2 cents:
What about taking all of that cash we were going to give away and investing it in clean technologies & research on US soil? I don't disagree about keeping our cash in-house, but this was not replacing foreign aid with local aid, the money disappeared and went somewhere else. We could have created the "US Accord".
Trump turned off the faucet and every spoiled money-grubbing shit hole is pissed off about it, ESPECIALLY our own politicians that are involved with "foundations" and companies that directly benefit from that absurd cash flow.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by GhostTX View PostParis accord was joke. The ultimate money redistribution. You have to wonder why the 2 biggest polluters (China and India) were void from paying anything nor having to clean up anything until 2030.
That was an aside. My 2 cents:
What about taking all of that cash we were going to give away and investing it in clean technologies & research on US soil? I don't disagree about keeping our cash in-house, but this was not replacing foreign aid with local aid, the money disappeared and went somewhere else. We could have created the "US Accord".
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by svauto-erotic855 View PostMerkel let the truth slip out in a moment of anger when Trump pulled us out of the treaty. She said that it was a tool for globalism that had been taken away and had nothing to do with the climate.
Interested....
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AnthonyS View PostMaybe the conspiracy theorists are onto something.... 12 trillion more in debt is just that much closer to destroying the USA , which is what the globalists want. The USA falls and Poland or any other country willing to stand up for themselves would crumble too.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe the conspiracy theorists are onto something.... 12 trillion more in debt is just that much closer to destroying the USA , which is what the globalists want. The USA falls and Poland or any other country willing to stand up for themselves would crumble too.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Gasser64 View PostI think its a fucking greek tragedy that ANY other country ever got a single cent of our money. I'd be going after them to pay it all back. Think how much lower our taxes could be if we never gave away any money. Any politician that just wants to give away taxpayer dollars because he's feeling benevolent, should be hanged in public shortly after even making the suggestion.
The Paris Climate Treaty (It is called a treaty everywhere in the world except the USA) had a price tag to the US tax payer of 12 Trillion dollars according to the UN that was supposed to administer the fund.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Strychnine View PostSo France promised Turkey some US money...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Strychnine View Posthttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-g...-idUSKBN19T11R
So France promised Turkey some US money, Trump said, "Eat shit," and suddenly "climate" isn't the biggest driver... hmmmm...
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: