Originally posted by AnthonyS
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why shouldnt I get a Judge?
Collapse
X
-
At that price point I would have gone S&W or something else...but it certainly is more performance.
-
My wife carries one around our land for song dogs, hogs, and snakes and she likes it. Seems like a decent gun and it's put up with all the neglect and abuse a woman would give it. Riding 4 wheelers through ponds, mudding, not cleaning and oiling it like it should have been. It still shoots good. I would buy another
Leave a comment:
-
-
Yeah I went ahead and picked one up. For 400 why not?!?!Originally posted by dblack1 View PostI've got one for a creek gun in stainless. I've had a moccasin swim over 40' towards me when casting towards the bank. I fish about 60+ times a year wading with kayak in tow for deep spots. It's a great gun for my purpose.
I'll wait until I would actually use a higher end thermal alot before getting one anyways....it was an easy trade off.
Leave a comment:
-
I've got one for a creek gun in stainless. I've had a moccasin swim over 40' towards me when casting towards the bank. I fish about 60+ times a year wading with kayak in tow for deep spots. It's a great gun for my purpose.
Leave a comment:
-
Haha...exactly what I thought. Even a moron like you knows his comment about hit probability with buckshot was 100% incorrect. But your biased pride literally makes you hide behind ignorant comments like this instead of saying "yeah that part of the video was stupid"Originally posted by SS Junk View PostI do, but you must understand I am not the one who is struggling with what was explained.
Leave a comment:
-
I do, but you must understand I am not the one who is struggling with what was explained.
Leave a comment:
-
You would think by now you would learn when you don’t understand something it may be to your advantage to ask questions instead of lashing out.Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View PostHe had a few good points then the dumbass lost me when he showed a target entirely peppered with buckshot and then a tight 3 bullet group from a 357 and claimed the wide spread didnt increase your hit probability. He literally demonstrated how shotguns cover more area per round...then said "but that doesnt increase your hit probability".
Leave a comment:
-
Unfortunately I think the bad rep is from catastrophic failures which I havent much from this gun. Just the polymers.Originally posted by AnthonyS View PostAwesome gun for nothing.... and people wonder why Taurus has a rep.
But this gun is certainly not the best and any 1 thing. It's the ole swiss army knife approach.
Leave a comment:
-
Awesome gun for nothing.... and people wonder why Taurus has a rep.Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
Leave a comment:
-
He had a few good points then the dumbass lost me when he showed a target entirely peppered with buckshot and then a tight 3 bullet group from a 357 and claimed the wide spread didnt increase your hit probability. He literally demonstrated how shotguns cover more area per round...then said "but that doesnt increase your hit probability".Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
Do you ever watch videos from educated people?
Leave a comment:
-
Everything you never needed to know.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ruffdaddy View PostThat was my plan, I just wanted to make sure there were no massive red flags about the guns performance
The only significant performance issue it has is that it's chambered in a 410 shotgun shell and they had to monkey with the rifling so much so that it can't hit nothing when you shoot it in 45 Colt.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: