Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Atf pistol brace rule

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bird_dog0347
    replied
    Originally posted by 32vfromhell View Post
    apparently, the judge clarified it applies to ALL plaintiffs, and that includes all members of the Firearms Policy Coalition.

    So, signing up for the FPC has some nice new benefits
    Originally posted by Stephen View Post
    I signed up
    That's great, I joined as well!

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen
    replied
    Originally posted by 32vfromhell View Post
    apparently, the judge clarified it applies to ALL plaintiffs, and that includes all members of the Firearms Policy Coalition.

    So, signing up for the FPC has some nice new benefits
    I signed up

    Leave a comment:


  • 32vfromhell
    replied
    Originally posted by bird_dog0347 View Post
    The 5th circuit granted an injunction yesterday (I think) but the way it read it was only applicable to the plaintiffs on the case, not broadly for everyone. I have not seen if it's been updated yet or not.
    apparently, the judge clarified it applies to ALL plaintiffs, and that includes all members of the Firearms Policy Coalition.

    So, signing up for the FPC has some nice new benefits

    Leave a comment:


  • AnthonyS
    replied
    Based on recent Supreme Court rulings against the EPA the ATF is likely exceeding their authority. Just like the EPA the ATF is not founded by law but was appointed by Executive Order. No one gets to decree law in this country; it is supposed to be voted on by a representative electorate. Same goes for the CDC and a host of other agencies.

    Leave a comment:


  • bird_dog0347
    replied
    The 5th circuit granted an injunction yesterday (I think) but the way it read it was only applicable to the plaintiffs on the case, not broadly for everyone. I have not seen if it's been updated yet or not.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen
    replied
    There’s some guys on YouTube talking about a preliminary injunction on the rule

    Leave a comment:


  • Craizie
    replied
    Originally posted by bird_dog0347 View Post
    It's a shame TX isn't on the list of states in that lawsuit.
    Too busy stopping abortions.

    Leave a comment:


  • 32vfromhell
    replied
    Originally posted by 71chevellejohn View Post
    Just beware... as of recent ruling, by the ATF's own admission, a piece of metal with an inaccurate drawing of a lightning link is a machine gun.
    I saw that. Matt Hoover kinda dug his own grave in that case by being pretty much a chucklehead and didn't really take the case seriously. I think he went into court dressed like a goober too, not a suit and tie.

    Leave a comment:


  • 71chevellejohn
    replied
    Originally posted by 32vfromhell View Post
    I mean, at that point, no difference in penalty to having an unregistered machine gun
    Just beware... as of recent ruling, by the ATF's own admission, a piece of metal with an inaccurate drawing of a lightning link is a machine gun.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sean88gt
    replied
    They can shove compliance up their asses.

    Leave a comment:


  • 32vfromhell
    replied
    I mean, at that point, no difference in penalty to having an unregistered machine gun

    Leave a comment:


  • Strychnine
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • bird_dog0347
    replied
    It's a shame TX isn't on the list of states in that lawsuit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen
    replied
    Looks like a bunch of states are suing the atf

    Leave a comment:


  • bobs94formula
    replied
    Don't forget they don't have the power to not charge the tax stamp. Only congress can do that. It's all a setup.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X