Anyone else ran across a nut job lately?

[Osiris]

Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:

(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and

(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:

(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or

(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and

(3) he reasonably believes that:

(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or

(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.


I'm going to go with 3 a and 3 b.

Hey, you might want to re-read this. You HAVE to have BOTH, 2(A) or (B) and 3 (A) or (B)

Killing a man for riding his dirtbike in mid day at 4 mph will get you life.

[Steve]

Or do you not keep an eye on your neighbor's home when they're not home?

Oh boy... lol

[347Mike]

You should've shot him when he tried running you over. I mean you would have shot an ankle biter dog that tried attacking you, I would think actually being threatened by a car would be more dangerous.

That is however, unless everyone on here who talks about shooting people for stupid shit is just completely speaking out of their ass.... Which I am sure they are...

[Forever_frost]

On the riding through the yard, that wasn't posted as no trespassing, what law was broken? And who appointed the nut the keeper of the yard? And where was it said it was a nice yard? It wasn't. The whole damned thing is dead.

And to coin this jackass almost running me over with a car as merely excessive is kind of moronic. It wasn't his yard, I wasn't hurting anything, and he completely flipped out. Not excusable.

Posted or not, it was trespassing. If you hadn't ridden your bike through someone's yard then this whole thing would have been avoided. And quite possibly, the home owner appointed the nut to watch it for him. Or do you not keep an eye on your neighbor's home when they're not home?

[SS Junk]

[SMKR]

Can you get us pics of the area Mike?

[mikec]

Absolutely. I didn't say the guy chasing him down wasn't excessive. If he wouldn't have broke the law in the first place none of this would have happened.

On the riding through the yard, that wasn't posted as no trespassing, what law was broken? And who appointed the nut the keeper of the yard? And where was it said it was a nice yard? It wasn't. The whole damned thing is dead.

And to coin this jackass almost running me over with a car as merely excessive is kind of moronic. It wasn't his yard, I wasn't hurting anything, and he completely flipped out. Not excusable.

[Steve]

Let me simplify this a bit. Step #1 mikec rides his dirt bike through someone's yard #2 dude from the house runs after him. #3 dude from the house is now chasing him down with his car. Eliminate step #1 and the last two never happen.

Get out of here with that common sense logic mister! lol.

[grove rat]

Eliminate step #1 and the last two never happen.

/thread

[dmh165638]

So the guy chasing him down in a car was his fault too? Makes perfect sense.

Absolutely. I didn't say the guy chasing him down wasn't excessive. If he wouldn't have broke the law in the first place none of this would have happened. It's really quite simple. I am puzzled when people come on here and tell a story where they did something wrong/broke the law and they are all butt hurt by the reaction they get from the person on the other side of the equation. Let me simplify this a bit. Step #1 mikec rides his dirt bike through someone's yard #2 dude from the house runs after him. #3 dude from the house is now chasing him down with his car. Eliminate step #1 and the last two never happen.

[Steve]

Steve, really? do elaborate. Please. Give us one more example of your judgemental holier than thou bullshit.

That post is a good example of a overly sensitive, knee jerk reaction to a simple sarcastic post. But thanks for proving my point. lol.

I'm shocked you didn't mention your training in Fujitsu in there.

No need, I am famous.

[Ratt]

I thought different DNA strands couldn't be infected?

Depends on what type of zombie you're talking about

[SMKR]

When the zombies come you'd be best to bring the dog in. If he bites a zombie, he'll become a zombie dog. You may unknowingly let him back in and get bit, therefore infecting your entire camp.

I thought different DNA strands couldn't be infected?

[Mike]

I thought Denny landed tonight.

lol

[71chevellejohn]

When the zombies come you'd be best to bring the dog in. If he bites a zombie, he'll become a zombie dog. You may unknowingly let him back in and get bit, therefore infecting your entire camp.