Originally posted by stevo
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Boom! Headshot! Sorry about the baby...
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by svo855 View PostIt will be ruled a good shooting but the officers actions are completely inexcusable. If there was a gun then I could see shooting him but I would not have shot him unless he was shooting at me or at another person. Unarmed perps holding a child should get taken down by physical force, not by being shot in the head. We are also making a huge assumption thinking that the neighbor who had a gun pulled on them did not deserve it.
Stevo
Leave a comment:
-
It will be ruled a good shooting but the officers actions are completely inexcusable. If there was a gun then I could see shooting him but I would not have shot him unless he was shooting at me or at another person. Unarmed perps holding a child should get taken down by physical force, not by being shot in the head. We are also making a huge assumption thinking that the neighbor who had a gun pulled on them did not deserve it.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe it was the diaper that was loaded?
Originally posted by talisman View PostDon got a pony?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 03trubluGT View PostIs that "eighteen feet"?
If so, that's hardly a marksman's challenge with a long gun.
Here's 300 feet with my rifle on a business card:
Yes, that is 3 rounds.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Machx2 View PostI was asking what your assumption was..... Have a nice day.
Originally posted by stevo View Post...the police should be allowed to kill you if you are going back inside of your house after people have made claims of you having weapons.
Stevo
Leave a comment:
-
Another person he shot, interesting story:
JAMES PETERS FATALLY SHOT MAN IN 2006... AND CITY PAID OUT $75,000
Not everyone agrees that Officer Peters always acts appropriately. Jason Leonard, a lawyer in Fort Myers, Florida, represented the family of a man killed in 2006 by him and another officer.
He is worried the city backs Officer Peters even when his actions are questionable. ‘My concern is that he seems to shoot first and ask questions later and has been supported in this policy,’ he said.
‘I don't think he's going after innocent citizens,’ Mr Leonard added. ‘However, if you find yourself in a precarious situation, he seems to err on the side of escalating the violence.’
Kevin Hutchings got into a fight with a friend in August 2006, then left and drove to his house in nearby Mesa. Officers had the friend call Mr Hutchings at his house, and police went there, Mr Leonard said.
While Mr Hutchings was talking on the phone, police cut the power to flush him out. Mr Hutchings came outside with a gun to investigate. Police said he shot at officers and they shot back.
Mr Leonard said cops never announced their arrival. The family accepted a $75,000 city payout.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostI know, all these people on this forum (besides me) are fucking crazy. I say it all the time to that leprechaun that rides a tiny little pony that keeps following me around.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by stevo View PostWas a baby holding the business card while being balanced on some deranged guy's hand?
Stevo
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Machx2 View Posthttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...shootings.html
There is another story where it states he threatened the neighbor with a gun while holding the baby.
And LOL at the first part of the article you linked:
A controversial policeman who fatally shot a grandfather holding his nine-month-old baby earlier this week has now been involved in six deadly shootings across one city over the past decade.
All five previous killings which involved James Peters, of Scottsdale, Arizona, were ruled justifiable by prosecutors, as was a shooting in which the victim survived -
Stevo
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Machx2 View PostWhere are you assuming? I was putting assume because we don't know what was said, just what the media is stating. Common sense will tell you he knew the police were there for him, and he had many guns pointed at him. Would you walk back inside at that point? Sure the neighbors stories were allegations at that point. But you have to take them seriously. I know for a fact you don't want that guy going back inside.
Originally posted by Machx2 View PostMaybe not, If i was there ..
Originally posted by Machx2 View PostWe can only use ifs. There is no evidence at all in this case either way. The officers are saying what they saw ect. One report says he threatened officers and neighbors and one states he threatened just neighbors. I use ifs because I have no clue. Unlike half the people here who just state their opinions and believe them to be 100% right regardless of what happend.
Originally posted by Machx2 View PostThis is exactly why I stopped posting in ftp threads lol. Everyone here is so closed minded it isn't even funny.
Stevo
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: