For those of you who despise red light cameras..

[Juiced4v]

Dang...when did this take in effect?

[lowthreeohz]

I got one for right on red while i was passing a fucking kidney stone and driving myself to the ER.. I had all the paperwork showing i was admitted just minutes after the infraction and it still took an act of fucking congress to get them to relieve the 75$ fine.. chump ass NRH.

[Broncojohnny]

Absolutely not, but at least the city would have made something off of it

That is crazy talk, government doesn't like money and cops don't lie.

[racrguy]

Absolutely not, but at least the city would have made something off of it

My point exactly.

[Forever_frost]

Would a camera stop a person from running a red light when they already weren't paying attention?

Absolutely not, but at least the city would have made something off of it

[racrguy]

Well, I'm normally FTP but when you have had someone close killed due to some dumb ass running a light you might change your mind about the cameras. Wish there might have been one at Seminary/James Ave and I wouldn't have had to make this post.

Would a camera stop a person from running a red light when they already weren't paying attention?

[kobuzz]

Well, I'm normally FTP but when you have had someone close killed due to some dumb ass running a light you might change your mind about the cameras. Wish there might have been one at Seminary/James Ave and I wouldn't have had to make this post.

[downshift_me]

Bitch puh-lease.

You better not be on duty!

[03trubluGT]

Yes Matt

Trolling

Bitch puh-lease.

[Chas_svo]

Statistics prove it to be revenue generation and inconvenience.

The only thing it's done is waste money and increase rear end collisions.

Actually in Phx/Scottsdale, it cut red light running so much, that the system was not paying at the rate that the city and the supplier initially figured, so the "fix" was to cut down the time delay so that more people were caught...the state (or fed) ruled that illegal.

So, they do tend to cut down the occurrences in that town anyway, and at least there, failed as revenue generators (actually costing tax payers to keep the system online). I tried to find links, but almost everything google returned was just like on here - people bitching about the tickets...

I've got one, and it sucked, but my biggest complaint was the way the system was "rigged" so that you had no option to contest. I would have lost, as the pics/video was pretty incriminating. I researched the "no contest" part before watching the vid.

[Broncojohnny]

Really Alan?

What do u think the motivation for me giving you guys an option?

Yes Matt

Trolling

[racrguy]

I've gotten nailed once, so they've made at least $75 off me.

Cool anecdotal evidence bra.

[03trubluGT]

The only thing it's done is waste money and increase rear end collisions.

I've gotten nailed once, so they've made at least $75 off me.

[racrguy]

Maybe if you don't want the inconvenience, you won't run the light.

Deterrence maybe?

The only thing it's done is waste money and increase rear end collisions.

[03trubluGT]

So there it is.. Just goes to show you this is pure bullshit revenue generation and inconvenience. No real deterrent or prevention of anything.

Maybe if you don't want the inconvenience, you won't run the light.

Deterrence maybe?