soooo...soap is banned

[Pokulski-Blatz]

before i post, is it okay to post two guys doing it.

Rick Modena seems ok with it.

[lincolnboy]

I didnt know you had already met up with Buzzo?

dude. He look like that Ryan guy.

[Baron Von Crowder]

before i post, is it okay to post two guys doing it.

I didnt know you had already met up with Buzzo?

[cool cat]

before i post, is it okay to post two guys doing it.

Only if it involves you dressed like a fat chick with a mustache and Buzzo.

[lincolnboy]

before i post, is it okay to post two guys doing it.

[bcoop]

Did I miss the definition of illegal?

Semantics. I can argue all day long that there are varying levels of legality. Misdemeanors (a, b, c), felonies (1st, 2nd, 3rd), and then Federal of course.

...

[SonicblueGT03]

Nope.

Did I miss the definition of illegal?

[Pokulski-Blatz]

Always is. Ask Maury Povich, you will tell you " you are the father"

"And that's the story of lincolnboy's recent marriage"

Always is. Ask Maury Povich, you will tell you " you are the father"

You will tell you, you?

[SSMAN]

posted a video of a cow sucking a guys dick.

I laughed...........

[lincolnboy]

Leave it to you to identify that as the wrong thing in Soap's actions. The penis was defiantly the culprit.

Always is. Ask Maury Povich, you will tell you " you are the father"

[Pokulski-Blatz]

Well at least it was defiant lol

Fuck.

[Chili]

Semantics. I can argue all day long that there are varying levels of legality. Misdemeanors (a, b, c), felonies (1st, 2nd, 3rd), and then Federal of course.

This is what I was going to say.

he was clearly banned for moral reasons, just like every other person who has been banned from this site was banned

it's not even a permaban, it's a fucking 5 day ban

Chili's knee-jerk reaction to say it was for legal reasons is because no sane person would imagine a world where that shit ISN'T illegal. So, while you got him on a technicality, your devil's advocate argument is worse than a lot of Racrguy's devil's advocate arguments.

There are absolutely varying degrees of illegal and immoral... I don't get pulled over for doing 6 over the limit, but if I do 200, I'm probably going to get locked up.

If I eat a few grapes at the grocery store, nobody gives a shit. If I break into your house and steal your baby, I'm probably going to do some time for it.

Gummy worms out of a prolapse-rose? meh

a baby calf suckin' a gypsy's dick? ban this psycho

Absolutely correct on the bold (well, I may call it an assumption rather than "knee-jerk").

That was clearly my mistake. I agree with the rest of your post as well.

[Cobraman]

Leave it to you to identify that as the wrong thing in Soap's actions. The penis was defiantly the culprit.

Well at least it was defiant lol

[bcoop]

My argument is spot on. Illegal is illegal, only the punishments vary. Which is exactly why the apple stealer gets less punishment than bank vault blower. Both acts are illegal, or contrary to the prevailing legal standards of the land. Simple as that.

Nope.