I was speaking specifically to his point about luck and looking at economic models. When everyone was saying 50%, $1b doesn't even touch 10%. And you're right, there is a lot at play, especially when other attorneys were saying she was looking at $9-11b.
It is a lot, but she wasn't just some short term trophy wife either. They were married 26 years, had kids together, and didn't have a prenup. She also didn't just sit around the house welping his brats, she ran Continental's marketing department for some years. She has some rights to claim that her position and work had influence on the value of her husband's company.
tap your brakes on the shitty attorney. what are your qualifications to call someone a shitty attorney on a billion dollar settlement? you and i both know there are plenty of dynamics going on that will never see the light of day.
I was speaking specifically to his point about luck and looking at economic models. When everyone was saying 50%, $1b doesn't even touch 10%. And you're right, there is a lot at play, especially when other attorneys were saying she was looking at $9-11b.
Not really lucky at all. From the settlement standpoint, he sounds like a shitty attorney. Yeah, he got fucking paid, but the economic model is one that any divorced man would love to adhere to.
tap your brakes on the shitty attorney. what are your qualifications to call someone a shitty attorney on a billion dollar settlement? you and i both know there are plenty of dynamics going on that will never see the light of day.
The rule is half of everything, and the half of your half. I'm paraphrasing from the judge, and it means just that. If you're divorced in TX and you get 25% of the community stuff, you did ok. If she gets less than 75%, you had a good lawyer, and you likely paid a fortune to him.
Divorce sux.
In my divorce I kept all of my stuff without an issue. Who gives away half?
Not really lucky at all. From the settlement standpoint, he sounds like a shitty attorney. Yeah, he got fucking paid, but the economic model is one that any divorced man would love to adhere to.
Eh, didn't say he was good, she could've got more....but that would be bullshit anyway. She got plenty. Then she appeals it? Cha-Ching again.
I just meant that no matter how the settlement is viewed, he got fuckin paid.
The rule is half of everything, and the half of your half. I'm paraphrasing from the judge, and it means just that. If you're divorced in TX and you get 25% of the community stuff, you did ok. If she gets less than 75%, you had a good lawyer, and you likely paid a fortune to him.
If I ever get married I will not get a divorce. I'll have an accidental discharge before some twat gets half my shit.
You have never been divorced?
The rule is half of everything, and the half of your half. I'm paraphrasing from the judge, and it means just that. If you're divorced in TX and you get 25% of the community stuff, you did ok. If she gets less than 75%, you had a good lawyer, and you likely paid a fortune to him.
Not really lucky at all. From the settlement standpoint, he sounds like a shitty attorney. Yeah, he got fucking paid, but the economic model is one that any divorced man would love to adhere to.
The idea that any woman is entitled to half of something she didn't work for is fucking absurd to begin with. Prenup, FTW
Everybody needs a prenuptial agreement. People think you gotta be rich to get a prenup ... ohhhhhh no. So you got $20 million and your wife wants $10 milliion, big deal, you ain't starving. But if you make $30,000 ... and your wife wants $15,000 ... you might have to kill her.
Leave a comment: