Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Go Army! Be all you can be!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bcoop
    replied
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    It seems to be so the way Frost wants the police treated, but for some reason he wants to protect the soldiers.

    You can't have it both ways. It's either due process for both, or neither.
    Can you fucking read? You're the ONLY one that doesn't get what he said. Jesus Christ.


    @ Trip - yes, it is the consensus, and exactly.

    Leave a comment:


  • 03trubluGT
    replied
    Originally posted by SlowLX View Post
    Holy shit, a simple non biased statement about upholding a persons basic rights no matter how heinous their crimes is evidence of covering up a black eye on the army?
    Like I said above, if you want due process, it applies to everyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • 03trubluGT
    replied
    Originally posted by Trip McNeely View Post
    I do believe that is the general consensus. Are you blind? Not even the other LEO's on the board ever jump in to defend you. Get a clue.
    Because they just don't want the hassle. Take a good hard look at it and try to see both sides.

    Leave a comment:


  • 03trubluGT
    replied
    Originally posted by David View Post
    So the constitution is out the window?
    It seems to be so the way Frost wants the police treated, but for some reason he wants to protect the soldiers.

    You can't have it both ways. It's either due process for both, or neither.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trip McNeely
    replied
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    Who are you to constantly follow my posts and decide if they are stupid?
    I do believe that is the general consensus. Are you blind? Not even the other LEO's on the board ever jump in to defend you. Get a clue.

    Leave a comment:


  • 03trubluGT
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    I don't go out of my way at all. If you'd stop posting stupid shit all the time I promise that it would be impossible for me to continuously point it out.
    Who are you to constantly follow my posts and decide if they are stupid?

    Who the fuck appointed you the antagonistic smart ass?

    Like I said, you are such a loudmouth online, but meek as a church mouse in public.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by SlowLX View Post
    He just said they should be executed and buried in unmarked graves... If that is protecting your buddies I'm staying the hell away from you fuckers.
    Actually, I don't want it to be an unmarked grave. I want it to be a fire pit that stands as testimony and reminder what happens when you violate your oath

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by 01yz2nv View Post
    Unfortunatly every organization has crazy dipshits that make the rest of us look bad whether it be police, fire, military, etc.
    And yet those of us in those professions who are objective, are actually willing to call for accountability and responsibility of those who fuck up. Not come up with fairytales on how they could be justified.

    Leave a comment:


  • talisman
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by 01yz2nv View Post
    Unfortunatly every organization has crazy dipshits that make the rest of us look bad whether it be police, fire, military, etc.


    True. Most people don't rush to defend the morons in their profession, or create soap opera "scenarios" to justify their actions, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • 01yz2nv
    replied
    Unfortunatly every organization has crazy dipshits that make the rest of us look bad whether it be police, fire, military, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • ceyko
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    You missed where I said IMMEDIATE trial. And I do mean Immediate. And punishment should be as well. Whereas you are all for putting cops who shoot people on the desk, or paid administrative leave, or any number of things. I have yet to see you take a hard stance on bad cops. You always come up with some hypothetical scenario where they're justified.
    Your last sentence is what does it for most of us who think he's strange now too.

    I mean, we could stretch things out and somehow justify what they were doing.

    ||
    i.e. they were likely just gun fanatics and high speed soldiers. However, since they were so high speed with so many weapons, they were labeled militia, framed and then squeezed to squeal.

    You have to know both sides of the story.
    ||

    However, all of that is probably bullshit. Give them their trial, quick and get their punishment executed. Disgrace to the service if they are guilty of murder as described.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    Frost stated that they should be punished ONLY IF they were (given a trial) found guilty. Here, let me illustrate it for you hard headed idiots.



    I swear Eric, you go out of your way to be an asshole.
    You missed where I said IMMEDIATE trial. And I do mean Immediate. And punishment should be as well. Whereas you are all for putting cops who shoot people on the desk, or paid administrative leave, or any number of things. I have yet to see you take a hard stance on bad cops. You always come up with some hypothetical scenario where they're justified.

    Leave a comment:


  • David
    replied
    Originally posted by 03trubluGT View Post
    Frost stated that they should be punished ONLY IF they were (given a trial) found guilty. Here, let me illustrate it for you hard headed idiots.



    I swear Eric, you go out of your way to be an asshole.
    So the constitution is out the window?

    Leave a comment:


  • stevo
    replied
    Four people = militia now?

    Stevo

    Leave a comment:


  • Rick Modena
    replied
    Originally posted by talisman View Post
    do you actually believe the shit you type?
    Yes.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X