I want a tank

[racrguy]

That is provocation. You ignore my signs, the paint, the gates and fences? You made your choice and obviously are here to do me harm

What the fuck? I like how you jump straight from "they're on my property" to "they're going to murder me and eat my kids"

No, that would be a legal way to do it and the only legal way for the federal government or any government to have any say on firearms in the United States.

Not according to that other guy.

[Forever_frost]

If you add an amendment, you can alter anything about our constitution, even making the Constitution completely lose it's power. It could actually read

"This amendment revokes the authority of the constitution as the limiting power of the federal government and establishes a monarchy of Barrack Obama for life, to be followed by those of his choosing. No other amendment may follow or remove this one."

Completely legal

[LANTIRN]

Want me to paint "Elvis was here" on the side? Give you some publicity?

Just write "god bless". We will know what it means.

[LANTIRN]

Problem would rapidly become the same as it was in Rome. They ran out of Gladiators so they started rounding people up and charging them just to keep new blood in the arena. Anytime killing becomes a national pass time, you are at the end of a lifespan for a country

This is a good point; there is a very large possibility of abuse. Not saying I am yet against the idea, but I do see your point. I will think on it.

[Forever_frost]

And what if someone introduced an amendment that repeals the second, would they then be committing a crime and violating their oath?

No, that would be a legal way to do it and the only legal way for the federal government or any government to have any say on firearms in the United States.

[Forever_frost]

im with this guy!!!!!!!!

i be all "i know that fool!!!!!!!!!!!!!" when the rampage is on CNN.

god bless

Want me to paint "Elvis was here" on the side? Give you some publicity?

[LANTIRN]

Bring back slavery!

It should have always been illegal, as no man should ever be held against his will in servitude (except convicts).

[Forever_frost]

You once said that you would shoot a mofo for just taking one step into your yard... Don't make me find the thread.

That is provocation. You ignore my signs, the paint, the gates and fences? You made your choice and obviously are here to do me harm

[Forever_frost]

They made the decision to break the law. Don't want to go to prison, or be put on death row, or forced to fight to the death for sport? Don't murder innocent people. It is a beautifully simple concept. Look at me, right now, not murdering anyone. It is actually a very easy thing to do. There are consequences for breaking the rules, and ours as a society should be far more serious than they are.

I also am in favor of public lashings for less serious offenses such as theft.

Problem would rapidly become the same as it was in Rome. They ran out of Gladiators so they started rounding people up and charging them just to keep new blood in the arena. Anytime killing becomes a national pass time, you are at the end of a lifespan for a country

[racrguy]

In my opinion, yes, as getting rid of part of the constitution would not be defending it. Sure it is technically legal to pass amendments that void any or every part of the document, but that still does not make it right. I think changing how senators are elected was a violation and a horrible thing as it changed the dynamics of the creation of laws. Yes technically it was legal to do, but it was wrong and I do believe those responsible should have been punished, but they are dead now and there isn't much we can do to them outside of spitting on their grave.

So now we're going to live in an ideological world? What about the people that don't share your viewpoint? Do we not allow discussion on topic because you don't agree with it/them?

Bring back slavery!

No shit.

[David]

Bring back slavery!

[LANTIRN]

Wait a fucking second, we have more than one practicing Constitutional Attorney on here?

Yes, and we are each making about $500 per hour during this discussion.

[LANTIRN]

And what if someone introduced an amendment that repeals the second, would they then be committing a crime and violating their oath?

In my opinion, yes, as getting rid of part of the constitution would not be defending it. Sure it is technically legal to pass amendments that void any or every part of the document, but that still does not make it right. I think changing how senators are elected was a violation and a horrible thing as it changed the dynamics of the creation of laws. Yes technically it was legal to do, but it was wrong and I do believe those responsible should have been punished, but they are dead now and there isn't much we can do to them outside of spitting on their grave.

[YALE]

I understand that but congress cannot make laws or sign treaties that violate the constitution. To do so would be illegal and a violation of their oath.

They can if it ends up as an amendment, and they have.

[slow99]

Wait a fucking second, we have more than one practicing Constitutional Attorney on here?