Originally posted by mustangguy289
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
God.
Collapse
X
-
Bad comparison. A cheap 4-gas meter will read oxygen levels, but won't prove the existence of god. Try again.
-
Oxygen can be seen.Originally posted by mustangguy289 View PostOf course I believe there is oxygen. It is just a point that somethings do exist whether you can see them or not.
Leave a comment:
-
I know. That's why they had to paint that Unicorn.Originally posted by mustangguy289 View PostThey did not have cameras 2000 years ago. I am sorry.
Leave a comment:
-
I am not one to cram my faith down other peoples throats. For one it is not efective and two its not my style. I will talk with anyone and share my beliefs with others anytime. I will also stick up for what I believe.Originally posted by MOSFET View PostOh, well I got the point, if not the sarcasm. I've been attacking the oxygen argument because it was weak, but the message was ultimately clear. Bottom line is that either you believe it or you don't. No one living has that answer, but I respect your resolve and your faith.
I really should have added a smiley when I said I bet there was oxygen.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, well I got the point, if not the sarcasm. I've been attacking the oxygen argument because it was weak, but the message was ultimately clear. Bottom line is that either you believe it or you don't. No one living has that answer, but I respect your resolve and your faith.Originally posted by mustangguy289 View PostOf course I believe there is oxygen. It is just a point that somethings do exist whether you can see them or not.
I really should have added a smiley when I said I bet there was oxygen.
Leave a comment:
-
Of course I believe there is oxygen. It is just a point that somethings do exist whether you can see them or not.Originally posted by MOSFET View PostNo.
Edit: I'm not totally inept at it, but it can't be subtle, or I have to know the person well. I thought you might have been obstinate with the statement, by I didn't read sarcasm in it.
Leave a comment:
-
No.Originally posted by mustangguy289 View PostYou don't get sarcasm well do you?
Edit: I'm not totally inept at it, but it can't be subtle, or I have to know the person well. I thought you might have been obstinate with the statement, by I didn't read sarcasm in it.
Leave a comment:
-
You don't get sarcasm well do you?Originally posted by MOSFET View PostInductive reasoning > mustangguy289
Leave a comment:
-
Inductive reasoning > mustangguy289Originally posted by mustangguy289 View PostCan you prove it? lmao
Leave a comment:
-
Can you prove it? lmaoOriginally posted by MOSFET View PostI bet they had oxygen.
Leave a comment:
-
I bet they had oxygen.Originally posted by mustangguy289 View PostThey did not have cameras 2000 years ago. I am sorry.
Leave a comment:
-
They did not have cameras 2000 years ago. I am sorry.Originally posted by jdgregory84 View PostIt finally popped up. It's a painting.

Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: