Coming soon to you...Pedophilia

[Forever_frost]

I'm all for removing welfare completely. Same token, I shouldn't be on the hook for illnesses caused by homosexuality and you completely blew past California teaching a homosexual agenda.

[Parasite Eva]

Not my fault I didn't go all tl;dr on the audience. XD

In all seriousness, dude, I totally missed your post. My bad!

[Maddhattter]

I'm all for removing welfare completely.

What you're for is irrelevant. The only reason welfare was brought up was to show that the homosexuals you're so intent on demonizing are actually doing less of the harm you're attributing to them than hetrosexuals.

Same token, I shouldn't be on the hook for illnesses caused by homosexuality

Good, because your not. Given that you've failed to demonstrate that AIDs was caused by homosexuality. So, be glad. You've no reason to believe you're on the hook for anything caused by homosexuality.

and you completely blew past California teaching a homosexual agenda.

Doesn't appear that anyone blew past your claim that homosexuals have an agenda that California is teaching. It's just irrelevant. It does not demonstrate how homosexuals "insist on that behavior being condoned and treated at tax payer expense" or that they engage in "high risk sexual behavior".

So, good job at spinning your wheels.

[Forever_frost]

So pushing to get homosexuality taught in school is not demonstrating how homosexuals insist that the behavior be condoned? REally? So I guess it's an accident that the law was written and passed.

And are you saying a behavior linked to a higher rate of transmission of HIV/AIDS is not a high risk activity?

[exlude]

Frost, just move on thinking you're right. You aren't going to change your mind and it hurts my head wondering how you don't get their points. Not to mention, trying to follow your topic jumping ass is always a fruitless debate.

[Maddhattter]

So pushing to get homosexuality taught in school is not demonstrating how homosexuals insist that the behavior be condoned? REally? So I guess it's an accident that the law was written and passed.

No, pushing that the acts of homosexuals that are historical in nature to be taught in schools is overcompensation of recompense for the subjugation of an entire class of people based on who they like to fuck. Much like black history month, woman's studies, etc. No implication of an agenda, as usually is the group that is most associated with carrying the prejudice that push these kinds of things. History FTW!

And are you saying a behavior linked to a higher rate of transmission of HIV/AIDS is not a high risk activity?

No, I don't consider sex being a "high risk sexual activity" anymore than I consider driving to be a "high risk crashing activity" or breathing to be a "high risk choking activity".

Then again, we are alive and that, by your terms, is a "high risk death activity", so we should do everything we can to prevent Russians from living.

[LANTIRN]

Blacks have a higher risk of HIV. So I guess being black is a high risk sexual activity?

[slow99]

Facepalm.

[Baba Ganoush]

I just wanted to correct one thing: Homosexuality IS NOT a genetic condition/mutation. It's a preference, like how you like your wopper. There is nothing in our genes that decides our sexual preference, it's a choice we make, period.

[racrguy]

I just wanted to correct one thing: Homosexuality IS NOT a genetic condition/mutation. It's a preference, like how you like your wopper. There is nothing in our genes that decides our sexual preference, it's a choice we make, period.

read.

http://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality.html

Keep in mind, this was written in 2003, with the last update in '04. So it's entirely possible the information contained wherein is outdated.