Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wikileaks...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • sc281
    replied
    Just issue a Letter of mark and reprisal.

    Constitutionally backed hit from the Oooold school.

    Leave a comment:


  • mr tinfoil hat
    replied
    Originally posted by Machx2 View Post
    Lol @ this going from wikileaks to bin laden
    They both are bullshit so they belong together.

    Leave a comment:


  • Machx2
    replied
    Lol @ this going from wikileaks to bin laden

    Leave a comment:


  • mr tinfoil hat
    replied
    Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
    Unlike you, I need proof. DNA would be nice. Video's and all the other silly shit you take as "fact" just don't cut it with me. Until it's "confirmed", I'll err to the side of caution, but if it makes you sleep better, carry on!
    Why would they confirm it when he's still an asset to our government? He's a great tool for America and other nations. All they have to do is make some bullshit claim he's somewhere and most of the idiots will support an attack on that region or whatever is being suggested. Here's an article where a CIA agent admits they have made a fake OBL tape before. http://blog.washingtonpost.com/spy-t...deas_to_d.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by mr tinfoil hat View Post
    You mean the fake videos? Yeah, those are bullshit.
    Unlike you, I need proof. DNA would be nice. Video's and all the other silly shit you take as "fact" just don't cut it with me. Until it's "confirmed", I'll err to the side of caution, but if it makes you sleep better, carry on!

    Leave a comment:


  • mr tinfoil hat
    replied
    Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
    According to the Pakistani Observer? I need to see that bastards ashes, head, or something identifiable, before I believe that. If that's the case, some asshole that has a real strong resemblance to him keeps cranking out video's from a cave in the mountains somewhere in Pakistan.
    You mean the fake videos? Yeah, those are bullshit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by mr tinfoil hat View Post
    Bin Laden died quite a while ago. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html
    According to the Pakistani Observer? I need to see that bastards ashes, head, or something identifiable, before I believe that. If that's the case, some asshole that has a real strong resemblance to him keeps cranking out video's from a cave in the mountains somewhere in Pakistan.

    Leave a comment:


  • mr tinfoil hat
    replied
    Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
    You have more confidence in our gov't than I do, especially with Barry at the helm. He would be the one to authorize a "sanction", and I don't think he has the balls. They may already know where this little shit-heel is, but can't get clearance. Then again, bin Laden's been out there for years. If they were that good, he'd be dead.
    Bin Laden died quite a while ago. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,41576,00.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    Originally posted by bcoop View Post
    I think if the US Govt really gave a shit about what he's putting out there, he'd have been dead long before this shit hit the internet. You guys act like the CIA doesn't know exactly where to find this asshat, what color underwear he has on, etc. Give me a fucking break. Anyone living in a civilized society is within their grasp at a moment's notice.


    No worries though. Sounds like Russia is going to take care of the little 'problem.'

    Wood - WTF man? Holy wow.
    You have more confidence in our gov't than I do, especially with Barry at the helm. He would be the one to authorize a "sanction", and I don't think he has the balls. They may already know where this little shit-heel is, but can't get clearance. Then again, bin Laden's been out there for years. If they were that good, he'd be dead.

    Leave a comment:


  • bcoop
    replied
    I think if the US Govt really gave a shit about what he's putting out there, he'd have been dead long before this shit hit the internet. You guys act like the CIA doesn't know exactly where to find this asshat, what color underwear he has on, etc. Give me a fucking break. Anyone living in a civilized society is within their grasp at a moment's notice.


    No worries though. Sounds like Russia is going to take care of the little 'problem.'

    Wood - WTF man? Holy wow.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vertnut
    replied
    It's time to send in the "wet work" guys. He's not a Head of State, Prime Minister, President, Emir, or any other political figure, so the assassination rules don't come into play. He's nothing more than a terrorist, and it's time to flip his switch. Take his ass out.

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    I was kind of on the fence these reasons: I don't need a rich European dilletante to tell me that: China's manipulation of currency has worried the US government, we're being urged by Saudi Arabia to attack Iran, or that Russia is a mafia state. This shit, however, is to far for me:

    Fuck that prick Assange. I hope they catch up to him like they did Pablo Escobar. No one's too big for their britches.

    Leave a comment:


  • mr tinfoil hat
    replied
    Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
    Don't you think the NY Times has a stake in being a lefty piece of shit rag? Of course they wouldn't print anything against the Global Warming religion. They do hate the good old US of A though so they'll print damaging documents about the war in Iraq and Afghanistan without hesitation. Do you not understand the game those pricks are running?

    Fact is, Wikileaks was hosted on Amazon servers. They suffered one of the largest denial of service attacks ever recorded after publishing those documents from what I understand. Where do you think that came from? I'll give you a hint, it is a building with five sides.

    Then Amazon removed their shit from the servers and told them to fuck off.

    I'm not sure what you expect the US government to do to servers hosted in Sweden.
    I completely understand the game being run, and that's exactly why I'm saying it's bullshit propaganda and nothing more. The only thing our media knows how to do is lie, and the ratings they're currently experiencing reflect that. People are starting to understand that all the MSM does is lie and feed us crap. We've become mushrooms, they keep us in the dark and feed us shit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Broncojohnny
    replied
    Originally posted by mr tinfoil hat View Post
    That doesn't mean shit. If any of it was a real threat they would have had their friends at the Newspapers and media squash it, but that didn't happen. The New York Times wouldn't even publish the climategate emails last year because they were illegally obtained. Yet here we are with alleged classified information obtained illegally and the New York times doesn't even blink before printing it. Believe what you will, but this shit stinks.
    Don't you think the NY Times has a stake in being a lefty piece of shit rag? Of course they wouldn't print anything against the Global Warming religion. They do hate the good old US of A though so they'll print damaging documents about the war in Iraq and Afghanistan without hesitation. Do you not understand the game those pricks are running?

    Fact is, Wikileaks was hosted on Amazon servers. They suffered one of the largest denial of service attacks ever recorded after publishing those documents from what I understand. Where do you think that came from? I'll give you a hint, it is a building with five sides.

    Then Amazon removed their shit from the servers and told them to fuck off.

    I'm not sure what you expect the US government to do to servers hosted in Sweden.

    Leave a comment:


  • mr tinfoil hat
    replied
    Originally posted by Broncojohnny View Post
    Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....the websites are in other countries dude.
    That doesn't mean shit. If any of it was a real threat they would have had their friends at the Newspapers and media squash it, but that didn't happen. The New York Times wouldn't even publish the climategate emails last year because they were illegally obtained. Yet here we are with alleged classified information obtained illegally and the New York times doesn't even blink before printing it. Believe what you will, but this shit stinks.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X