If you shoot an attacker, aren't you presuming guilt?

[SMEGMA STENCH]

No, but now you know its true. And who the hell is henry

[racrguy]

Well, seeing as how you don't know me irl, technically, you can't say that. But... that's the response I'd expect from you. You probably sit in your little apartment actually thinking that everyone on here is the mirror image of their text posts.



As usual, your post negates itself. Seeing as how I was able (originally, at some point about 14 years ago) to register somewhere and post. As this post itself is evidence of. You should just start posting blank, empty posts. For all that you accomplish it would turn out to be pretty much the same. Just type a few little dots, then turn them white via the provided tools. Trust me, you'll be a lot better off.

Aaah. You saw Henry's post as well, didja. Way to come up with your own stuff.

[exlude]

ST truly does not understand allegories. Talisman's comment about "ST hearing of us making fun at his expense and running to check his bank account" rings truer than ever.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

Well, seeing as how you don't know me irl, technically, you can't say that. But... that's the response I'd expect from you. You probably sit in your little apartment actually thinking that everyone on here is the mirror image of their text posts.

You aren't smart enough to be..... In order for that to be true you'd have to be able to pour piss out of a boot with instructions written on the heel, which you clearly cannot do.

As usual, your post negates itself. Seeing as how I was able (originally, at some point about 14 years ago) to register somewhere and post. As this post itself is evidence of. You should just start posting blank, empty posts. For all that you accomplish it would turn out to be pretty much the same. Just type a few little dots, then turn them white via the provided tools. Trust me, you'll be a lot better off.

[bcoop]

Maybe I'm just a bat shit crazy, raving lunatic. Maybe that explains why some of my posts are sensible stuff that no one seems to have a problem with. And others seem to be like inciting a riot. Hmm.

Not at all. Most people just dont see you as worthy of having a conversation with, because you're too far gone.

[racrguy]

You aren't smart enough to be.....

a bat shit crazy, raving lunatic.

In order for that to be true you'd have to be able to pour piss out of a boot with instructions written on the heel, which you clearly cannot do.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

Maybe I'm just a bat shit crazy, raving lunatic. Maybe that explains why some of my posts are sensible stuff that no one seems to have a problem with. And others seem to be like inciting a riot. Hmm.

[BERNIE MOSFET]

Funny how projection is always arising somewhere on these forums. Is that your feeble mind's attempt to explain what you can't understand?

You are quite the enigma.

[Bassics]

Textbook.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

Funny how projection is always arising somewhere on these forums. Is that your feeble mind's attempt to explain what you can't understand?

[Bassics]

I just realized this air-biter is probably a valuable case study to any psychoanalyst researching projection issues.

Jeez, textbook.

[Snatch Napkin]

Haha you're still grasping at straws eh? And you still don't understand how google works? Well they can't all be winners I guess. Wait, I think I know what you do. You just read like the first line of someone's post, then you inject your pitiful little opinion in, making yourself look like a fool to everyone who actually read the post and just doesn't care to argue with you or point out your foolishness. You'll want to know how I came to that assumption, but I'm doubt you'll read this far. I'll explain it to your thickheaded ass one more time, but after that you're on your own. StanleyTweedle was a lecherous character on a SciFi TV show back in the early 2000's. So can that tiny little pea sized thing you call a brain, possibly calculate the odds that someone, somewhere, might create a screen name based on that fact? Yeah probly not. I'm probly wasting my breath aren't I.

I know you didn't read past the first line of that post, but seeing as how I do that job for a living, I wouldn't expect you to understand. Just like you wouldn't expect me to understand the intricate delicacies of scrubbing the trucker shit off the toilet down at the truck stop.



Annnnd now you prove your ignorance about linux driver issues. That's ok. Linux isn't for everyone. Especially you.



Please. I've written some smaller apps for ubuntu and android. I've even contributed a lot of my personal time (for free of course) on KDE 4.2. Programmer here.

Wow, you envisioned this all by yourself.

I can promise you, that anyone who has read these posts is quite clear on who the idiot is. That would be you, dood.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

What I'm telling you is not my interpretation, but how the legal system interprets things - how it works. Do you see the difference?

Oh yes most certainly. I'm just on the side of the fence that won't consider how the legal system interprets things, when it comes to defending the lives of my family/friends/etc. Or putting a stop to theft/robberies where it looks like the life of some innocent person might be at risk from someone who deserves to die anyway. In short, I see what you're talking about when it comes to all the lawyer bullshit that a person may end up having to deal with once he decides to pull the trigger.

[SMEGMA STENCH]

Coming from the virgin loser that couldn't figure out how to run Dungeons and Dragons on Linux. Ironic, isn't it? I think I get it. The insults you pathetically attempt to throw out, are admissions of your own pathetic life. I mean, because if it makes you feel like the loser you are, surely it will make someone else feel bad.

What's wrong, Justin? The supervirgin boards, err PickupArtist boards slow today? Did you ever get that D&D problem worked out? You were one confused pencil dick over that issue. The kind people there pointed it out in black and fucking white, and you still didn't understand. Much like you don't understand the laws surrounding murder.

Haha you're still grasping at straws eh? And you still don't understand how google works? Well they can't all be winners I guess. Wait, I think I know what you do. You just read like the first line of someone's post, then you inject your pitiful little opinion in, making yourself look like a fool to everyone who actually read the post and just doesn't care to argue with you or point out your foolishness. You'll want to know how I came to that assumption, but I'm doubt you'll read this far. I'll explain it to your thickheaded ass one more time, but after that you're on your own. StanleyTweedle was a lecherous character on a SciFi TV show back in the early 2000's. So can that tiny little pea sized thing you call a brain, possibly calculate the odds that someone, somewhere, might create a screen name based on that fact? Yeah probly not. I'm probly wasting my breath aren't I.

I know you didn't read past the first line of that post, but seeing as how I do that job for a living, I wouldn't expect you to understand. Just like you wouldn't expect me to understand the intricate delicacies of scrubbing the trucker shit off the toilet down at the truck stop.

You're the dumbfuck that's registered on another site talking about D&D. We've already seent the link.

Annnnd now you prove your ignorance about linux driver issues. That's ok. Linux isn't for everyone. Especially you.

Maybe, but one thing is for sure, he knows the proper syntax for a filepath in Linux...

Please. I've written some smaller apps for ubuntu and android. I've even contributed a lot of my personal time (for free of course) on KDE 4.2. Programmer here.

[BERNIE MOSFET]

Well, I guess that will depend on your interpretation of the law then. Just as judges often "interpret" the law. It says "defensible". You see "Yeah only if some lawyer doesn't try to send me to prison". I see "If some mother fucker comes up in my house and tries to steal shit when I'm home, he's a dead man"

The reality of how this shit works is not open to interpretation. You are naive to think your interpretation has any weight with the legal system. What I'm telling you is not my interpretation, but how the legal system interprets things - how it works. Do you see the difference?