Originally posted by Vertnut
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
US staff sergeant kills 16 Afghan civilians
Collapse
X
-
I don't think I've covered carpet bombing. I've covered using predator drones and mines for our borders but carpet bombing is a waste of munitions. I prefer strikes where you know who it is you killOriginally posted by Slowhand View PostYour carpet bombing strategies seem to fly in the face of this statement.I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool
Comment
-
Nuclear weapons. No waste and let god sort em out. We need more glass parking lots IMO.Originally posted by Forever_frost View PostI don't think I've covered carpet bombing. I've covered using predator drones and mines for our borders but carpet bombing is a waste of munitions. I prefer strikes where you know who it is you kill
Comment
-
I am being serious when I say this. Why not kill the children over there? The fighters that we are facing today were in their early teens when we killed their fathers at the beginning of the war 10 years ago. If we are serious about total victory then we will have to go old testament on the entire population of that country. If we don't have the nuts for that we may as well not ever try fighting an irregular war.Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Z06killinsbf View PostNuclear weapons. No waste and let god sort em out. We need more glass parking lots IMO.
We no longer have any nukes that can do what you are describing. The high yield city buster are gone and what we have left would be severely limited in the damage that can be done by the nature of the terrain.Magnus, I am your father. You need to ask your mother about a man named Calvin Klein.
Comment
-
<--- prior nuclear weapons technician.Originally posted by svo855 View PostWe no longer have any nukes that can do what you are describing. The high yield city buster are gone and what we have left would be severely limited in the damage that can be done by the nature of the terrain.
What model are you referring to?
Comment
-
I know for a fact that they sent 8 year olds and younger to fight us. So women and children? There's every possibility those 'innocents' weren't. But going straight off the news reports he was wrong. However it cannot be stressed enough they send women and children to battle usOriginally posted by svo855 View PostI am being serious when I say this. Why not kill the children over there? The fighters that we are facing today were in their early teens when we killed their fathers at the beginning of the war 10 years ago. If we are serious about total victory then we will have to go old testament on the entire population of that country. If we don't have the nuts for that we may as well not ever try fighting an irregular war.I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool
Comment
-
We have several that would destroy HUGE swaths of land and glass it. ICBMs are bad bad things.Originally posted by svo855 View PostWe no longer have any nukes that can do what you are describing. The high yield city buster are gone and what we have left would be severely limited in the damage that can be done by the nature of the terrain.I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool
Comment
-
I still think it's funny that people are impressed by the Aegis system that they show on the commercials. My father helped install that system and he got out of the Navy in '93.Originally posted by Z06killinsbf View PostThe W88 has a 475 Kt rating to that. Times 4-5 per missile, times 24 missiles per submarine, times 16 submarines (US not counting England) capable of carrying these weapons with a 5k nm range. Now tell me again we can't make some parking lots.
Comment

Comment