Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US staff sergeant kills 16 Afghan civilians

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Z06killinsbf
    replied
    Most of that crap is 70's tech anyways. Rows and rows of equipment that a laptop can do.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Z06killinsbf View Post
    The W88 has a 475 Kt rating to that. Times 4-5 per missile, times 24 missiles per submarine, times 16 submarines (US not counting England) capable of carrying these weapons with a 5k nm range. Now tell me again we can't make some parking lots.
    I still think it's funny that people are impressed by the Aegis system that they show on the commercials. My father helped install that system and he got out of the Navy in '93.

    Leave a comment:


  • Z06killinsbf
    replied
    The W88 has a 475 Kt rating to that. Times 4-5 per missile, times 24 missiles per submarine, times 16 submarines (US not counting England) capable of carrying these weapons with a 5k nm range. Now tell me again we can't make some parking lots.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by svo855 View Post
    We no longer have any nukes that can do what you are describing. The high yield city buster are gone and what we have left would be severely limited in the damage that can be done by the nature of the terrain.
    We have several that would destroy HUGE swaths of land and glass it. ICBMs are bad bad things.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by svo855 View Post
    I am being serious when I say this. Why not kill the children over there? The fighters that we are facing today were in their early teens when we killed their fathers at the beginning of the war 10 years ago. If we are serious about total victory then we will have to go old testament on the entire population of that country. If we don't have the nuts for that we may as well not ever try fighting an irregular war.
    I know for a fact that they sent 8 year olds and younger to fight us. So women and children? There's every possibility those 'innocents' weren't. But going straight off the news reports he was wrong. However it cannot be stressed enough they send women and children to battle us

    Leave a comment:


  • Z06killinsbf
    replied
    Originally posted by svo855 View Post
    We no longer have any nukes that can do what you are describing. The high yield city buster are gone and what we have left would be severely limited in the damage that can be done by the nature of the terrain.
    <--- prior nuclear weapons technician.

    What model are you referring to?

    Leave a comment:


  • svauto-erotic855
    replied
    Originally posted by Z06killinsbf View Post
    Nuclear weapons. No waste and let god sort em out. We need more glass parking lots IMO.

    We no longer have any nukes that can do what you are describing. The high yield city buster are gone and what we have left would be severely limited in the damage that can be done by the nature of the terrain.

    Leave a comment:


  • svauto-erotic855
    replied
    I am being serious when I say this. Why not kill the children over there? The fighters that we are facing today were in their early teens when we killed their fathers at the beginning of the war 10 years ago. If we are serious about total victory then we will have to go old testament on the entire population of that country. If we don't have the nuts for that we may as well not ever try fighting an irregular war.

    Leave a comment:


  • Z06killinsbf
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    I don't think I've covered carpet bombing. I've covered using predator drones and mines for our borders but carpet bombing is a waste of munitions. I prefer strikes where you know who it is you kill
    Nuclear weapons. No waste and let god sort em out. We need more glass parking lots IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeFingerPete
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    I was basing my statement on the statistic that 78.4% of the country are christians. I realize that there are other denominations that were in the building.
    LOL @ 78.4 percent of America actively doing or being anything besides alive and in debt.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by Slowhand View Post
    Your carpet bombing strategies seem to fly in the face of this statement.
    I don't think I've covered carpet bombing. I've covered using predator drones and mines for our borders but carpet bombing is a waste of munitions. I prefer strikes where you know who it is you kill

    Leave a comment:


  • Slowhand
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    I was basing my statement on the statistic that 78.4% of the country are christians. I realize that there are other denominations that were in the building.
    CHRISTIAN NATION, bro.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Vertnut View Post
    Killed a lot more than christians...Jews, Muslims, and a lot of atheists, too. Very poor example, if you were trying to make a point. Besides, I'm thinking Jeremy said that tongue-in-cheek.

    This got a lot more attention from "Barry the messiah" than the Fort Hood massacre did. Hmmmm.
    I was basing my statement on the statistic that 78.4% of the country are christians. I realize that there are other denominations that were in the building.

    Leave a comment:


  • Slowhand
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    I absolutely do not believe in targeting women and children.
    Your carpet bombing strategies seem to fly in the face of this statement.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by Slowhand View Post
    lmao, leave it to forever frost to rationalize this.
    I in no way said he was right, and I absolutely do not believe in targeting women and children. However I can see the need of someone who's been in a firefight and seen his brothers die and seen Obama sucking Karzi's cock to strike out. Is it right? Absolutely not. Can I see the point of view? Absolutely.

    War is hell.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X