Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eric Holder Charged with Contempt

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by matts5.0 View Post
    honestly i just want paul to make a huge impact on the republican party, as he is doing. I will vote accordingly, if paul can make a big enough impact on romneys run for and hopefully eventual presidency then i will vote for him.
    I consider this a clear, lucid, and reasonable thought. I would like the same thing.

    Comment


    • #17
      So private citizens are being tried and put away BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, but the MAIN people behind this bullshit (THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT) are getting off scot fucking free??


      DALLAS (AP) — A judge has given a prison sentence to a fourth Texas man federal officials say was linked to a gun used in a U.S. agent's death in Mexico.

      Otilio Osorio, from North Texas, was sentenced Monday to seven years in prison after pleading guilty to conspiracy and other charges relating to a gun-running network. His brother, Ranferi Osorio, received a 10-year prison term for running the network.

      The firearms charges are not directly related to last year's death of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata in Mexico. However, federal officials have said that another gun purchased in October 2010 by Otilio Osorio was used in the February 2011 attack on two ICE agents as they drove on a highway near San Luis Potosi in Mexico, killing Zapata and wounding Victor Avila.
      How do we forget ourselves? How do we forget our minds?

      Comment


      • #18
        Contempt proceedings underway.
        How do we forget ourselves? How do we forget our minds?

        Comment


        • #19
          What I'd like to know is what is the end game? Congress charges him with contempt.. and then what? Obama just ignores it? That's pretty much exactly what he will do. Any teeth behind any of this?
          "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
          "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by CJ View Post
            Any teeth behind any of this?

            Torches and pitchforks?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Strychnine View Post
              Torches and pitchforks?
              "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
              "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by CJ View Post
                What I'd like to know is what is the end game? Congress charges him with contempt.. and then what? Obama just ignores it? That's pretty much exactly what he will do. Any teeth behind any of this?
                From my limited understanding is that once there's a contempt charge, they can go to the courts for remedy. I wonder how Holder would treat us if we refused to release every bit of information he wanted during an inquisition
                I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by The Geofster View Post
                  http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...elT_story.html

                  Issa is being interviewed now and just said that there is a citation that has been drafted. I think he's just waiting on Boehner's OK before formally issuing it.
                  damn...that link died fast

                  Originally posted by matts5.0 View Post
                  the very reason paul cant win is what makes me not want to vote romney and keep the status quo going.. the media and republican party do not want paul to win and the gravy train to end. America needs real change, romney is not enough, its either a vote for a police state/big government or a socialist state/big government.. Paul very well can get the nomination, therefore can win the election. but instead i guess we can all just sit on dfwstangs and squabble and bicker over why paul cant win because someone on fox news didnt tell you he could.
                  Sorry man, it ain't happening. And I definitely don't want another 1992 or 1996 with a 3rd candidate.
                  "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by matts5.0 View Post
                    Paul very well can get the nomination
                    When I read this stuff, it makes me wonder if you understand how things work. No, he can't get the nomination. He was fucking annihilated. The people of the US do not want him. You had the election, it didn't happen - for the third time. It's over forever now. You need to move on.
                    "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
                    "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by GhostTX View Post
                      damn...that link died fast


                      Sorry man, it ain't happening. And I definitely don't want another 1992 or 1996 with a 3rd candidate.
                      The post with the link was made in April.

                      Stevo
                      Originally posted by SSMAN
                      ...Welcome to the land of "Fuck it". No body cares, and if they do, no body cares.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by GhostTX View Post
                        damn...that link died fast
                        Here ya go. I happened to have left the link open.


                        Holder retracts claim Bush team knew about Fast and Furious

                        June 20, 2012


                        In a second major retraction over its version of the the gun-walking scandal, the Justice Department has retracted Attorney General Eric Holder's charge in a hearing last week that his Bush administration predecessor had been briefed on the affair.

                        In a memo just released by Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Iowa senator reveals that Holder also didn't apologize to former Attorney General Michael Mukasey for dragging him into the Fast & Furious scandal that is headed for a major legal clash and likely contempt of Congress charge against Holder.

                        According to Grassley's memo, Justice said that Holder "inadvertently" made the charge against Mukasey in a hearing.

                        Here is the full text of the Grassley memo:

                        To: Reporters and Editors

                        Re: Second retraction of Fast and Furious Assertions

                        Da: Wednesday, June 20, 2012

                        The Justice Department has retracted a second statement made to the Senate Judiciary Committee. During a hearing last week, Attorney General Eric Holder claimed that his predecessor, then-Attorney General Michael Mukasey, had been briefed about gunwalking in Operation Wide Receiver. Now, the Department is retracting that statement and claiming Holder "inadvertently" made that claim to the Committee. The Department's letter failed to apologize to former Attorney General Mukasey for the false accusation. This is the second major retraction the Justice Department has made in the last seven months. In December 2011, the Department retracted its claim that the ATF had not allowed illegally purchased guns to be trafficked to Mexico. Sen. Chuck Grassley's letter and the Department's response can be viewed here-1.

                        In addition, the Justice Department released only one page of additional material prior to the Attorney General's meeting on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. It is a page of handwritten notes by a public affairs specialist for the Deputy Attorney General, which the Department says it "just recently discovered." The notes indicate that when Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jason Weinstein met with senior ATF officials on April 28, 2010, regarding the problem of gunwalking in Wide Receiver, the Deputy Attorney General's public affairs specialist also attended the meeting. These notes can be viewed here-2.

                        The notes indicate that Fast and Furious was also a topic discussed at the meeting, in addition to Wide Receiver. These notes further corroborate contemporaneous emails in 2010 that show Criminal Division Chief Lanny Breuer and Weinstein seemed to have been more concerned about the press implications of gunwalking than they were about making sure ATF ended the practice. (These emails can be viewed here-3.) The notes also undermine the claim that senior DOJ officials failed to "make the connection" between the gunwalking in Wide Receiver--which Breuer admitted to knowing about--and gunwalking in Fast and Furious. In fact, both cases were discussed by senior Department leadership and senior ATF leadership.

                        Grassley made the following comment on these developments.

                        "This is the second time in nearly seven months that the Department has gotten its facts wrong about gunwalking. Attorney General Holder accused Attorney General Mukasey, without producing any evidence, of having been briefed on gunwalking in Wide Receiver. The case Attorney General Mukasey was briefed on, Hernandez, is fundamentally different from both Wide Receiver and Fast and Furious since it involved cooperation with the Mexican government. Attorney General Holder's retraction should have included an apology to the former Attorney General.

                        "In his eagerness to blame the previous administration, Attorney General Holder got his facts wrong. And his tactic didn't bring us any closer to understanding how a bad policy evolved and continued. Bad policy is bad policy, regardless of how many administrations carried it out. Ironically, the only document produced yesterday by the Department appears to show that senior officials in the Attorney General's own Department were strategizing about how to keep gunwalking in both Wide Receiver and Fast and Furious under wraps."

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by stevo View Post
                          The post with the link was made in April.

                          Stevo

                          It worked as of an hour ago though.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Strychnine View Post
                            It worked as of an hour ago though.

                            Maybe Obama is trying to erase all the past info, like in 1984.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              23 yes
                              17 no
                              Holder in Contempt of Court.
                              Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by kbscobravert View Post
                                23 yes
                                17 no
                                Holder in Contempt of Court.
                                *congress
                                "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." -Benjamin Franklin
                                "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." -Alexander Fraser Tytler

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X