Who do you most side with?

[Dlachance]

[Shaggin Wagon]

[Slowhand]

I dont even know who this guy is, but I like him!!

Libertarian Party's candidate. He's much more along the lines of what people around here like to spew rhetoric about until it comes down to crunch time and they begin buying the party-line form.

Still not interested in voting for him, though.

[motoman]

[RCITNet]

I had the lady, forgot her name. And then Ron Paul followed by Mitt Romney

Sent from my Droid RAZR Maxx

[SlowLX]

It might be that your political views have changed, (or evolved as 0bama put it) or that you now pay much closer attention to each politician. I know I did, on both.

Stevo

Perhaps. The only reason Romney will get my vote over me wasting it on Johnson is his vp candidate. Ryan's the only politician of the main 4 that seems to not be a complete mouthpiece for their respective party.

[racrguy]

Funny. I agree with RP on this. It is just a "theory" by name.

Colloquial theory =/= scientific theory. Gravity is just a theory, germ theory is also just a theory. Light, and sound? Both based on theories.

[Vertnut]

Colloquial theory =/= scientific theory. Gravity is just a theory, germ theory is also just a theory. Light, and sound? Both based on theories.

A theory none-the-less. I do believe in a version of evolution, but it's not cut-and-dried. Lots of holes there and not near enough explanation about them.

[racrguy]

A theory none-the-less. I do believe in a version of evolution, but it's not cut-and-dried. Lots of holes there and not near enough explanation about them.

Explain each of your points further pl0x. We can take it to pm's if you'd like to not muck up the thread.

[LS1Goat]

.

[Forever_frost]

Colloquial theory =/= scientific theory. Gravity is just a theory, germ theory is also just a theory. Light, and sound? Both based on theories.

Is there any proof macro evolution has created a single multicelled lifeform?

[Vertnut]

Explain each of your points further pl0x. We can take it to pm's if you'd like to not muck up the thread.

I'm not here to convince you of anything, and I won't. There are huge "jumps" in the evolution theory that can not be explained. Did we evolve from a single-celled organism? Maybe. I happen to think we had a little "creationism" help.

[silverhatch]

http://imgs.isidewith.com/results-image/72862440.jpg

[Sean88gt]

91 for Mitt and Paul. Although the answers to the questions didn't capture my thoughts in their entirety.

[racrguy]

Is there any proof macro evolution has created a single multicelled lifeform?

Don't start with that line of bs. AFAIK Micro and macro evolution were terms coined by religious folk who have no clue what they're talking about. Surely if you're in the process of getting a masters you had to have taken at least some biology, did they ever mention micro and macro evolution?

I'm not here to convince you of anything, and I won't. There are huge "jumps" in the evolution theory that can not be explained. Did we evolve from a single-celled organism? Maybe. I happen to think we had a little "creationism" help.

Sooooo, you're just going to say its bullshit and not give a valid reason, then you're going to say creationism is a valid explanation? Get the fuck outta here with that nonsense. Lolz

I didn't expect you to convince me of anything, I was merely wondering if your reasons were founded. Given what I've seen here they aren't.