Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama uses executive power to move gun control agenda forward

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama uses executive power to move gun control agenda forward

    Obama uses executive power to move gun control agenda forward


    Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...#ixzz2OwDvZgWJ
    Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook


    President Obama is quietly moving forward on gun control.

    The president has used his executive powers to bolster the national background check system, jumpstart government research on the causes of gun violence and create a million-dollar ad campaign aimed at safe gun ownership.


    The executive steps will give federal law enforcement officials access to more data about guns and their owners, help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally ill, and lay the groundwork for future legislative efforts.

    It is unclear whether the National Rifle Association will challenge any of the executive actions in court. A spokesman for the NRA did not return a request for comment.

    The moves, which have not been widely touted by the administration, come as Obama ups his pressure on Congress to take action on gun control in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings. The Senate is expected to begin floor consideration of legislation when it returns in April.

    Efforts to renew a ban in semi-automatic weapons with military-style features and high-capacity magazines have stalled in Congress. Democratic senators still hope to move gun control legislation that includes tougher background checks, but conservative Republican senators have threatened to filibuster it.

    If approved by the Senate, any bill would then face tough sledding in the GOP-controlled House.

    Gun control groups say Obama’s piecemeal approach falls short of what could be accomplished by legislation overhauling the nation’s gun laws. Still, they argue the actions remain important and will reduce gun violence.

    “They’ve taken direct aim at some of the bigger problems in the regulatory part of the issue and they’re doing it in the right way and that’s going to be very helpful,” said Mark Glaze, the director of Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns group.

    “Ultimately you need to close the loopholes in the law that will continue to undermine enforcement, but what they’re doing is precisely right.”


    They also illustrate the administration’s power to change gun laws despite inaction on Capitol Hill, a practice the president may need to duplicate in other policy areas amid congressional gridlock.

    Obama’s steps began the same day he unveiled his 23 gun control proposals in January, when he issued a memorandum requiring all nine federal law enforcement agencies to submit guns they confiscate to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) for tracing.

    According to a notice sent by Attorney General Eric Holder last month, the agencies will have to submit a report to the Justice Department (DOJ) within the next month showing they are compliant.

    The move, and several more like it, is aimed at strengthening the quality and quantity of records contained within the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), according to a DOJ spokeswoman.

    For years, federal law enforcement officials and gun control advocates have complained that the NICS gun records are not complete, making it easier for people with criminal records and mental illnesses to buy guns.

    A key factor in strengthening the NICS database, they say, is getting states to report more information on mental health and criminal history records.

    Earlier this month, the DOJ announced a $20 million grant program aimed at incentivizing states to submit more mental health and criminal history information into the NICS database.


    Also this month, the White House Office of Management and Budget said it would consider changing rules to make it easier for states to share mental health records with the NICS.

    Through these moves, Glaze said the administration has addressed two of the main reasons for incomplete trace data: a lack of money and privacy concerns.

    “By taking direct aim at the two biggest problems inhibiting the database they are taking a significant chunk out of 50 percent of the system’s weaknesses,” said Glaze.


    In January, Obama directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to begin studying the causes of gun violence for the first time since Congress, at the behest of the NRA, began blocking funding for such research in 1996.

    The CDC has since awarded a contract to the Institute of Medicine (IOM), which this spring will soon begin looking at the role video games and social media play in gun violence, as well as whether gun technologies and access to guns can be used to reduce violence.


    The aim is to affect future legislation by giving lawmakers empirical data on an area that has been largely bereft for nearly two decades. Without government research, gun control advocates say they are forced to rely on private studies, which do not hold the same clout on Capitol Hill.

    “You can’t make good policy without good data and for a generation the NRA has been throwing dirt in the eyes of Congress so they can’t actually see what’s going on around them," said Glaze.


    As part of the agency’s preliminary research, the CDC and IOM on April 23 will host an all-day conference in Washington, D.C. to hear from firearm and gun violence experts, researchers, and advocates on both sides of the issue, according to Richard Feldman, a former NRA lobbyist who now leads the Independent Firearm Owners Association.

    Feldman said he questions whether the CDC can lawfully spend money on studies that Congress has barred, but he plans to attend and noted that the NRA’s former research director, Paul Blackman, has been invited to the event as well.

    In another administrative move, Obama directed the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to examine the efficacy of existing gun trigger locks and firearm safe standards to determine if they need to be improved. The CPSC has partnered with the American Society for Testing and Materials International but does not have a firm timeline for when it’s examination will be finished, according to a spokesman.

    Separately, the administration has given $1 million to the National Crime Prevention Council (NCPC) to create, produce and distribute a nationwide multimedia ad campaign on safe gun ownership and storage. The campaign is heading into the research phase and is expected to air by the early fall, according to a NCPC spokeswoman.

    And regional offices with the General Services Administration have begun to reach out to local schools, advising them about the agency’s “Cooperative Purchasing” program, which gives discounted rates to schools on security equipment including: surveillance cameras, emergency communication systems, security design and support, and employee background check systems.



    Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administ...#ixzz2OwE4Pt13
    Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

  • #2
    What an asshole.

    Comment


    • #3
      I just glanced at article and saw CDC is going to have input on gaming.

      WTF.
      Originally posted by MR EDD
      U defend him who use's racial slurs like hes drinking water.

      Comment


      • #4
        They are either forcing us into mandatory servitude or they are forcing an armed uprising, either way, I think we end up in the first category, sadly, I think we get there by default and inaction.

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm OK with more stringent background checks. I'm oddly OK with mandatory registration of firearms upon transfer (including rifles).

          Why? because it would help bolster the NRA view that illegally possessed firearms are the #1 contributor in most shootings. It will de facto neuter almost every left wing opposition to gun ownership. Some might call it "giving in and letting Big Gov know who has what"... but if all we (gun owners) have to do is shrug our shoulders and lay blame on lots of these killings to "another illegally owned firearm", it would help shift public opinion on WHAT the gov wants to really do with this "GUN CONTROL" and kill a lot of their left-wing slant on the topic.

          What I am not OK with is mental health BLANKET judgements like Cali uses. I don't have time to expound but it's too muddy.
          Originally posted by PGreenCobra
          I can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!
          Originally posted by Trip McNeely
          Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy
          dont downshift!!
          Go do a whooly in front of a Peterbilt.

          Comment


          • #6
            So, registration and confiscation to prove a point? Because that's worked at all with this douche bag. Everytime you think he's done something that will hamstring him, the media and his followers gloss over it.
            I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DON SVO View Post
              Why? because it would help bolster the NRA view that illegally possessed firearms are the #1 contributor in most shootings. It will de facto neuter almost every left wing opposition to gun ownership. Some might call it "giving in and letting Big Gov know who has what"... but if all we (gun owners) have to do is shrug our shoulders and lay blame on lots of these killings to "another illegally owned firearm", it would help shift public opinion on WHAT the gov wants to really do with this "GUN CONTROL" and kill a lot of their left-wing slant on the topic.
              You don't really think that would be the end result of tracking gun ownership do you?

              Look at the chain. Obamacare is ownership of the health care industry, which includes mental health. They can now make it a federal mental health policy that anyone owning more than two registered firearms is a nutcase, therefore their "permission" to bear arms (no longer a right) is revoked.

              This is pretty easy....
              When the government pays, the government controls.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by 46Tbird View Post
                You don't really think that would be the end result of tracking gun ownership do you?

                Look at the chain. Obamacare is ownership of the health care industry, which includes mental health. They can now make it a federal mental health policy that anyone owning more than two registered firearms is a nutcase, therefore their "permission" to bear arms (no longer a right) is revoked.

                This is pretty easy....
                It's a slippery slope into a big pile of shit.
                "It's another burrito, it's a cold Lone Star in my hand!"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by dee View Post
                  It's a slippery slope into a big pile of shit.
                  and there is nothing but slope all around us to chose for a path. We really are in a shitty situation because they are not going away, ever.
                  Fuck you. We're going to Costco.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by 46Tbird View Post
                    You don't really think that would be the end result of tracking gun ownership do you?

                    Look at the chain. Obamacare is ownership of the health care industry, which includes mental health. They can now make it a federal mental health policy that anyone owning more than two registered firearms is a nutcase, therefore their "permission" to bear arms (no longer a right) is revoked.

                    This is pretty easy....
                    I specifically noted I am not good with the mental health aspect of it. There's too much grey area that can be exploited.
                    Originally posted by PGreenCobra
                    I can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!
                    Originally posted by Trip McNeely
                    Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy
                    dont downshift!!
                    Go do a whooly in front of a Peterbilt.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by DON SVO View Post
                      I specifically noted I am not good with the mental health aspect of it. There's too much grey area that can be exploited.
                      It's all or nothing, if you give them 1 single provision, they won't be happy, they'll keep hammering points until they get their entire way.

                      Draw a line, abide by it, and defend it.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
                        It's all or nothing, if you give them 1 single provision, they won't be happy, they'll keep hammering points until they get their entire way.

                        Draw a line, abide by it, and defend it.
                        I'll expound on it after work. My thought process is to beat them at their own game and make them hypocrites in the end.
                        Originally posted by PGreenCobra
                        I can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!
                        Originally posted by Trip McNeely
                        Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy
                        dont downshift!!
                        Go do a whooly in front of a Peterbilt.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Sure, that would work if they didn't already know that law-abiding gun owners weren't the problem or if keeping guns out of criminals' hands were their goal.
                          Originally posted by Broncojohnny
                          HOORAY ME and FUCK YOU!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by DON SVO View Post
                            I'll expound on it after work. My thought process is to beat them at their own game and make them hypocrites in the end.
                            You can't be logical with emotional people and expect them to make logic based decisions.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Nash B. View Post
                              Sure, that would work if they didn't already know that law-abiding gun owners weren't the problem or if keeping guns out of criminals' hands were their goal.
                              My view is to literally back them into a corner so badly that they cannot pass legislation.

                              Originally posted by Sean88gt View Post
                              You can't be logical with emotional people and expect them to make logic based decisions.
                              You don't have to be logical or emotional... you have to make the position of jacking with gun owners so detrimental (to your job as congressman/senator) that you won't do it.

                              We're all on the same page that they'll sell their soul to cover their own tail. Put law-abiding gun owners, effectively, on a pedestal.
                              Originally posted by PGreenCobra
                              I can't get over the fact that you get to go live the rest of your life, knowing that someone made a Halloween costume out of you. LMAO!!
                              Originally posted by Trip McNeely
                              Originally posted by dsrtuckteezy
                              dont downshift!!
                              Go do a whooly in front of a Peterbilt.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X