Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gosnell case

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • exlude
    replied
    I agree FF, laws are known to be consistent.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    Not false. I can't murder something that isn't alive, right? If I can, elaborate as murder kind of requires something to be alive first.
    Answer me something first. If I explain these concepts to you yet again will you shut up about it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Not false. I can't murder something that isn't alive, right? If I can, elaborate as murder kind of requires something to be alive first.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    No idea how this is even a debate. If I can be charged with murdering it, it's alive. Pretty simple
    False. As has been explained to you before. Why do you guys not come up with better arguments when it's so easy to make you look like fools? Do you think if you say the same bullshit enough times it'll somehow become true?

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    No idea how this is even a debate. If I can be charged with murdering it, it's alive. Pretty simple

    Leave a comment:


  • slow06
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    When doctors tell me that a fetus that can kick, turn, react to light, has a heartbeat, and so forth isn't alive, then I'll agree with you. If I shoot a pregnant woman and kill her and her fetus I get charged with two counts not one. Can't have the cake and eat it too.

    As much as abortion sickens me, I see no authority of the federal government in abortion however if these statists want government involved, then suck it up, it's involved.
    Agreed. It is either alive or not. You can't call it murder on one hand and not the other.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    When doctors tell me that a fetus that can kick, turn, react to light, has a heartbeat, and so forth isn't alive, then I'll agree with you. If I shoot a pregnant woman and kill her and her fetus I get charged with two counts not one. Can't have the cake and eat it too.

    As much as abortion sickens me, I see no authority of the federal government in abortion however if these statists want government involved, then suck it up, it's involved.

    Leave a comment:


  • slow06
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    As sperm was mentioned and not the child, that is the applicable definition. Did you not say sperm?

    One second:



    Yep you did
    He clearly means when the fetus is viable, since you don't abort sperm.

    Feel free to disagree with his opinion, personally I do, but it is not entirely unreasonable to say life begins when a fetus is able to live outside of the womb.

    The bottom line is we have to define when life begins. If you ask me I would say at the first heartbeat. Legislate from there. I would encourage personal responsibility that goes farther, including abortion not ever being an option, but that is just me. I won't let the government define my moral standard, be it more or less strict on any given subject (although I will obey the law).

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    As sperm was mentioned and not the child, that is the applicable definition. Did you not say sperm?

    One second:

    What is this, the catholic fucking church? Every sperm is not sacred.
    Yep you did

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    I believe he is referring to this:

    vi·a·ble [ v əb'l ]
    practicable or worthwhile: able to be done or worth doing
    able to grow: able to germinate or develop normally
    able to survive outside womb: describes a fetus that can survive outside the womb
    Way to NOT choose the correct definition for the conversation..

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    If you are struggling with the word "viable" in the context of this discussion, you may want to take a step back and read up on the subject a little as you are considerably far behind.
    I believe he is referring to this:

    vi·a·ble [ v əb'l ]
    practicable or worthwhile: able to be done or worth doing
    able to grow: able to germinate or develop normally
    able to survive outside womb: describes a fetus that can survive outside the womb

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    If you are struggling with the word "viable" in the context of this discussion, you may want to take a step back and read up on the subject a little as you are considerably far behind.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    I don't believe he said sacred. I think he said Viable.

    Would you like a breakdown of what each word means?

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    What is this, the catholic fucking church? Every sperm is not sacred.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aceman85turbo
    replied
    I do not think that word means what you think it means, you were "Viable" when you squirted from your dad's dong.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X