Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Democratic Senators Tell White House of Concerns About Health Care Law Rollout

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Democratic Senators Tell White House of Concerns About Health Care Law Rollout



    WASHINGTON — Democratic senators, at a caucus meeting with White House officials, expressed concerns on Thursday about how the Obama administration was carrying out the health care law they adopted three years ago.
    Enlarge This Image

    Doug Mills/The New York Times
    Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius at a hearing Wednesday.
    Democrats in both houses of Congress said some members of their party were getting nervous that they could pay a political price if the rollout of the law was messy or if premiums went up significantly.

    President Obama’s new chief of staff, Denis R. McDonough, fielded questions on the issue for more than an hour at a lunch with Democratic senators.

    Senator Jeanne Shaheen, Democrat of New Hampshire, who is up for re-election next year, said, “We are hearing from a lot of small businesses in New Hampshire that do not know how to comply with the law.”

    In addition, Mrs. Shaheen said, “restaurants that employ people for about 30 hours a week are trying to figure out whether it would be in their interest to reduce the hours” of those workers, so the restaurants could avoid the law’s requirement to offer health coverage to full-time employees.

    The White House officials “acknowledged that these are real concerns, and that we’ve got to do more to address them,” Mrs. Shaheen said.

    Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa and chairman of the appropriations subcommittee on health care, said he was extremely upset with Mr. Obama’s decision to take money from public health prevention programs and use it to publicize the new law, which creates insurance marketplaces in every state.

    “I am greatly disappointed — beyond upset — that the administration chose to help pay for the Affordable Care Act in fiscal year 2013 by raiding the Public Health and Prevention Fund,” Mr. Harkin said.

    The administration said it had transferred $332 million from the prevention fund to pay for “education and outreach” activities publicizing the new insurance markets, or exchanges.

    To express his displeasure, Mr. Harkin has blocked Senate action on Mr. Obama’s nominee to be administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Marilyn B. Tavenner. By putting a “hold” on the nomination, aides said, Mr. Harkin hopes to draw the White House into negotiations on the future of the prevention fund, which he has championed.

    At Congressional hearings this week, Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, said it was necessary to tap the prevention fund because Congress had refused to provide money requested by the president for outreach and education activities.

    Senator Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana and chairman of the Finance Committee, said last week that the administration deserved “a failing grade” for its efforts to explain the law to the public.

    “I just see a huge train wreck coming down,” Mr. Baucus said then.

    But after hearing White House officials on Thursday, Mr. Baucus said he was encouraged, and he praised the administration’s efforts to get healthy young people to sign up for insurance coverage.

    Senator Benjamin L. Cardin, Democrat of Maryland, said he told White House officials on Thursday that he was concerned about big rate increases being sought by the largest health insurer in his state. The company, CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield, has sought increases averaging 25 percent for individual insurance policies that will be sold in the state insurance exchange, and it is seeking increases of about 15 percent for small businesses. The company said the higher premiums reflected costs of complying with the new law.

    Senator Cardin said he was also distressed by the administration’s failure to require health insurers to provide affordable coverage of dental services for children. The law lists pediatric dental care as one of 10 categories of “essential health benefits” to be provided by all health plans.

    Under a rule issued by the administration, Mr. Cardin said, “there is no guarantee or requirement that families have pediatric dental coverage, and the coverage could be provided in a stand-alone plan with a separate deductible, so that a family with two children might have to pay as much as $1,400 in out-of-pocket costs for dental coverage.”

    In that case, he said, many families would go without dental coverage.

    Congressional leaders wrestled at the same time with a more parochial concern, health insurance for members of Congress and their aides.

    A provision of the 2010 law, sought by a Republican senator, says members of Congress and many of their aides must get their health benefits through the new insurance exchanges. Some lawmakers and their aides are worried that the government may not continue to pay its share of the premiums.

    Michael Steel, a spokesman for Speaker John A. Boehner, said this was the “Democrats’ problem to solve.”

    But Adam Jentleson, a spokesman for Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Senate Democratic leader, said, “No legislative fix is necessary.”
    I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

  • #2
    Holy shit? Is this a legitimate post that hasn't been spinmeistered?!

    Comment


    • #3
      How about "Dems Freak Over Obamacare Implimentation?"
      I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

      Comment


      • #4
        how about "dems cram through a bill three years ago that the vast majority of the country did not want, now they complain that is difficult to implement in the real world"

        Don't u worry one bit democrats and your stupid ass constituents, WE WILL BLAME YOU STUPID TWO BIT FUCKS FOR THIS ONE. NOTHING IS FUCKING FREE AND GOVT HEALTH CARE ISNT THE ANSWER!

        Comment


        • #5
          It wouldn't fit in the box
          I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

          Comment


          • #6
            Wll, we needed to see what was in the bill. They had to vote on it initially.

            Comment


            • #7
              Surprise surprise surprise. They were too stupid to see what a fiasco obamacare is. Now they expect obummer to pull some strings to keep their dumb motherfuckin asses from getting kicked out of office come election time.
              Last edited by line-em-up; 04-26-2013, 08:50 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Politico caused a bit of a stir this week when it asserted that Congress was in bipartisan negotiations to exempt its employees from Obamacare mandates. That turned out to be an oversimplification, but that didn’t stop twitter and the blogosphere from reacting with glee at the spectacle.

                “The talks — which involve Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), the Obama administration and other top lawmakers — are extraordinarily sensitive,” Politico reported, “with both sides acutely aware of the potential for political fallout from giving carve-outs from the hugely controversial law to 535 lawmakers and thousands of their aides.”

                “Unbelievable,” tweeted Brian Beutler at the left-of-center Talking Points Memo.

                But according to Ezra Klein at the Washington Post, the truth is somewhat more prosaic. The problem stems from an amendment offered during the Obamacare fight by Iowa Sen. Charles Grassley, a Republican, which apparently requires congressional staffers to obtain their health care coverage from the exchanges set up under the new healthcare law.

                If this means, as many think it does, that the federal government will be prohibited from subsidizing their healthcare coverage, then the results for congressional staffers could be devastating.

                Congressional employees would be left to the exchanges as if they were self-employed or as if they worked for an exempt company, rather than having employer-based insurance.

                Grassley's amendment was intended as a "poison pill," meant to embarrass Democratic lawmakers, not actually become part of the law. Democrats, Klein argues, responded by embracing the amendment.

                “That’s where the problem comes in,” Klein wrote. “This was an offhand amendment that was supposed to be rejected. It’s not clear that the federal government has the authority to pay for congressional staffers on the exchanges, the way it pays for them now in the federal benefits program. That could lead to a lot of staffers quitting Congress because they can’t afford to shoulder 100 percent of their premiums.”

                The assumption behind the Politico article is that both Republican and Democratic lawmakers are anxious to protect their own staffers, and thus are willing to offer each other cover to correct this "mistake."

                But as the backlash to the Politico piece developed, Boehner took to Twitter, suggesting that Republicans would not cooperate in changing how the law is currently written.

                “The fact that Dem leaders want to opt themselves out of ObamaCare shows Sen Baucus isn’t only one who realizes it's a #trainwreck,” Boehner tweeted Thursday morning. “We're not sneaking any language into bills to solve Dems' #hcr problem. The solution to this & other ObamaCare nightmares is #fullrepeal,” Boehner added in another tweet.
                Whos your Daddy?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Looks like someone should have read that turd, instead of grand-standing and cheering when it was stuck up our asses.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I hope this kicks every Dem in the teeth come 2014 when premiums skyrocket. Then, maybe the Pubs will win a major majority in the Senate and House and repeal this monstrosity.
                    "Self-government won't work without self-discipline." - Paul Harvey

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Between this and the gun grab, I hope Reid loses his position
                      I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                        How about "Dems Freak Over Obamacare Implimentation?"
                        How about its almost mid-term time. Barrys going to get real lonely in the near future I have a feeling.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                          Between this and the gun grab, I hope Reid loses his position
                          I could die tomorrow happy knowing that would happen. I HATE that fucking snake in the grass more than barry.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Imagine a Congress without Reid or Pelosi in authority
                            I wear a Fez. Fez-es are cool

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
                              Imagine a Congress without Reid or Pelosi in authority

                              Barry ant shit other than a dumb ass. Them two scare me more than 10 barrys. barry is just wind.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X