So why make the comment? All I did was make a halfway funny, to me at least, joke because y'all were all bitching about the bias. It didn't call for a statement on your part alleging that I don't do good work. Why not come back with a halfway witty comment yourself that didn't disparage? Call me names, don't try and affect my means of making a living.
What if they listed you as staff, and you never even went on the trip? Would you be staff at that point?
EDIT: And not some hypothetical you that works for White House, either. Just you.
At the very least it would be an error, but I doubt the secret service would allow anyone to be accidentally listed as having attended a flight on air force one; that would be a pretty big hole in security, I would think.
As for someone who did attend the flight, like their daughters, it sounds like it is at the very least an error in mislabeling. What it actually sounds like is another attempt at fraud.
Frost, if I am a retarded monkey, then you are that monkeys shit. I set you up all last year during the election until Romney lost and you didn’t even see it happening. My level of comprehension is so far beyond yours it hurts my head to even try and make things simple enough for you to understand. This is evident by you being unable to ever respond to simple questions.
As long as the questions make sense, I am willing to answer any that I am capable of doing so.
Oh, CS is a retarded monkey and I'm not addressing that. You said perhaps it's a drop down menu. If this is the case, you should be able to back it up. I believe since you made the statement, it's on you to back it up.
Frost, if I am a retarded monkey, then you are that monkeys shit. I set you up all last year during the election until Romney lost and you didn’t even see it happening. My level of comprehension is so far beyond yours it hurts my head to even try and make things simple enough for you to understand. This is evident by you being unable to ever respond to simple questions.
My my, this sure has turned into the usual thread with the same two guys repeatedly slamming Frost as they do in EVERY thread. They are, if one thing, getting very predictable.
Yes I stand corrected the one where I stated " I would agree with you but then we would both be wrong" was definitive; however, the others are reaching in my opinion.
Adding "in my opinion" at the end of a statement does not subtract from the fact that you are implying someone is wrong.
MikeC: Why don't you stick to what you do best, and run along and snipe a construction job that someone else will have to fix? Name calling doesn't suit you.
You are saying I have done work that someone else had to fix?
Right you are. While it's a simpler alternative, another would be that they're using tax dollars to give their kids allowance by listing them as senior staff.
Believable. I have never heard of a poor ex-president, or ex-president's kid.
Right you are. While it's a simpler alternative, another would be that they're using tax dollars to give their kids allowance by listing them as senior staff.
Oh, CS is a retarded monkey and I'm not addressing that. You said perhaps it's a drop down menu. If this is the case, you should be able to back it up. I believe since you made the statement, it's on you to back it up.
No, I don't. I'm simply offering far simpler alternatives, for the purpose of poking holes in the article he posted, and I said, "perhaps," not, "I'm certain." They're different terms. I'm not positing a theory. He is. I'm pointing out its logical flaws. We also aren't presented with evidence that they were even listed as senior staff, beyond the article's claim.
Oh, CS is a retarded monkey and I'm not addressing that. You said perhaps it's a drop down menu. If this is the case, you should be able to back it up. I believe since you made the statement, it's on you to back it up.
May be. Can you find any other president listing their children on trips as senior staff? If it's a drop down then there should be instances of it happening under other presidents.
I'm not digging for that, and I really don't have to. My point is that cyclonescott hasn't made his case, not that a very specific explanation is right or wrong. In providing explanations more plausible than his conclusion, I am not attempting to posit a counter theory, I am simply illustrating that the conclusion his article reaches may be a bridge too far.
At this point there are far too many people slinging too much petty stuff hoping something sticks. I hate Obama just as much as you guys do, but this shit is ridiculous.
It's because the media was silent until he attacked THEM. This is crap he's been doing that is just now coming to light.
Dude, it may just be a drop down option on a computer menu. Senior staff might be an easy way to differentiate them from others on board, for the benefit of the crew, and the Secret Service. Occam's razor, old chap.
May be. Can you find any other president listing their children on trips as senior staff? If it's a drop down then there should be instances of it happening under other presidents.
See, I'd maybe go with that if this was an isolated incident.
At this point there are far too many people slinging too much petty stuff hoping something sticks. I hate Obama just as much as you guys do, but this shit is ridiculous.
Leave a comment: