Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama daughters are paid staff!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    The evidence is what has been offered up. They are listed as staff. Not just staff, Senior Staff. How many senior staff aren't paid positions?
    Dude, it may just be a drop down option on a computer menu. Senior staff might be an easy way to differentiate them from others on board, for the benefit of the crew, and the Secret Service. Occam's razor, old chap.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
    See, I'd maybe go with that if this was an isolated incident.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    The evidence is what has been offered up. They are listed as staff. Not just staff, Senior Staff. How many senior staff aren't paid positions?

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    I'd have to see proof of your hypothesis. While it's not a smoking gun, it does fit into the given evidence of a president so drunk on power that he believes nothing applies to him, that he and his family are royalty with rules that can be bent to fit whatever he wants.
    Unfortunately, evidence supporting the original hypothesis, that they're paid staff, is all I'm asking for.

    Leave a comment:


  • racrguy
    replied
    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by YALE View Post
    You'd think it, but it's within the realm of possibility.
    I'd have to see proof of your hypothesis. While it's not a smoking gun, it does fit into the given evidence of a president so drunk on power that he believes nothing applies to him, that he and his family are royalty with rules that can be bent to fit whatever he wants.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by Pro Trash View Post
    Yes I stand corrected the one where I stated " I would agree with you but then we would both be wrong" was definitive; however, the others are reaching in my opinion.
    I'm sorry, every time I read your posts I think of this guy:



    Every post is just slimy politician too afraid to take a stand on anything because there maybe repercussions for your beliefs so you couch everything in passive aggressive language that claims moral and educational superiority.

    I'm just waiting for you to reply with "I said good day!"

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    Yet you'd think with the number of presidents who have kids there'd be that option.
    You'd think it, but it's within the realm of possibility.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pro Trash
    replied
    Originally posted by stevo View Post
    First, you can be certain that you have not "touched" one of my nerves. I have yet to have my "mean spirit" show it's face as well. And if my process of calling a spade, a spade has been considered an 'attack', I'm sorry you feel that way.

    But... if you actually need "factual information" of the recent times you informed someone in a very polite, passive aggressive manor that they were wrong, here are a couple below:







    Stevo
    Yes I stand corrected the one where I stated " I would agree with you but then we would both be wrong" was definitive; however, the others are reaching in my opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Yet you'd think with the number of presidents who have kids there'd be that option.

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    So, either they lied on the paperwork to defraud taxpayers or they are stupid enough to call their children staff
    Possibly, but it may be something as simple as an automated system with a bad or limited drop down selection. They may have been categorized as staff because there wasn't a, "president's kids," selection on the menu. It might be easier to lump them in with White House staff in the computer, to differentiate them from press and other guests. I just don't see the evidence that points to them being paid. I need a record of payment, not just an obscure listing in a passenger manifest for a flight. I don't like Obama, and I think stupid little attempts like this to snipe at his family distract from how big an evil fuck he really is, and let the rest of the political machine get away with mowing the world down for fun and profit.

    Leave a comment:


  • stevo
    replied
    Originally posted by Pro Trash View Post
    Well Stevo, I feel as though I touched a nerve, your response comes off a bit mean spirited. I have not told anyone they are wrong, please if I have pull that quote and show it to me. I have not called you a single name or stated you are wrong, your entire statement above is attacking in nature in my opinion but lacks any factual information, it is your opinion to which you are entitled. I do find this site fun and inspiring, I learn things on this site so it has value. I agree everyone has an opinion, some I agree with, some I do not, that in itself does not make it right or wrong.

    If you truly believe everything you stated above then who am I to tell you that you are not correct? You are entitled to you own perception of reality just as I am mine. I have not attacked you or berated your opinion; however, the same cannot be said of you in my opinion. I think you lack the ability to accept an opposite opinion in an intelligent and respectful manner, you do not have to agree or disagree for I have developed my opinion on that matter. If you disagree I will not be offended or tell you that you are wrong, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
    First, you can be certain that you have not "touched" one of my nerves. I have yet to have my "mean spirit" show it's face as well. And if my process of calling a spade, a spade has been considered an 'attack', I'm sorry you feel that way.

    But... if you actually need "factual information" of the recent times you informed someone in a very polite, passive aggressive manor that they were wrong, here are a couple below:

    Originally posted by Pro Trash View Post
    I would agree with you but then we'd both be wrong.
    Originally posted by Pro Trash View Post
    Denny pointing at the educators is the wrong way to go about it in my humble opinion....
    Originally posted by Pro Trash View Post
    No, I simply do not agree with you and this is something you either refuse to accept or lack the ability to process.....
    Stevo

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    So, either they lied on the paperwork to defraud taxpayers or they are stupid enough to call their children staff

    Leave a comment:


  • YALE
    replied
    Originally posted by LANTIRN View Post
    If they are listed as staff, how are they not staff?
    What if they listed you as staff, and you never even went on the trip? Would you be staff at that point?

    EDIT: And not some hypothetical you that works for White House, either. Just you.
    Last edited by YALE; 05-20-2013, 08:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • LANTIRN
    replied
    Originally posted by YALE View Post
    I understand the definition of staff. What I don't understand is how listing them as staff, when they clearly are not, makes them staff.
    If they are listed as staff, how are they not staff?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X