Don't it make my Red state Blue...

[asphaltjunkie]

http://www.mysanantonio.com/default/...al-5270099.php


So a "Federal" judge (the U.S. Government) rules Texas' ban on gay marriage unconstitutional. I wonder if they plan on going after the other 16 states that ban gay marriage, or if they're just trying to turn one of the largest Red states into a Blue one....

[lowthreeohz]

I really DGAF about gay marriage. if 2 people want to be miserable with eachother, who the fuck am i to have a say in that?

and Texas has been sliding towards the blue for a while now... dont kid yourself.

[War Machine]

Good

[Baron Von Crowder]

Will someone please explain why this is an issue ?

[mstng86]

Will someone please explain why this is an issue ?

Yup.

Why do I need to feel mad about this?

[Chili]

Will someone please explain why this is an issue ?

Because God hates fags?

[Scott Mc]

I really DGAF about gay marriage. if 2 people want to be miserable with eachother, who the fuck am i to have a say in that?

My thoughts too, why get mad either way of a piece of damned paper.

[YALE]

Will someone please explain why this is an issue ?

Because morons cite the bible and the law without reading either.

[bcoop]

Will someone please explain why this is an issue ?

Clearly, people don't have anything better to worry about than what goes on in someone else's bedroom.


Seriously, you fucking crybabies need to get the fuck over it. Other people's sexual orientation doesn't affect you a single fucking bit.

[asphaltjunkie]

It has nothing to do with gay marriage. It's about giving enough of the people what they want so they'll vote for you blindly.

It has to be more than just a coincidence that the Feds have deemed unconstitutional one of the unions largest Red state's ban on gay marriage.

[YALE]

It has nothing to do with gay marriage. It's about giving enough of the people what they want so they'll vote for you blindly.

It has to be more than just a coincidence that the Feds have deemed unconstitutional one of the unions largest Red state's ban on gay marriage.

The Feds, or a single judge?

[racrguy]

It has nothing to do with gay marriage. It's about giving enough of the people what they want so they'll vote for you blindly.

It has to be more than just a coincidence that the Feds have deemed unconstitutional one of the unions largest Red state's ban on gay marriage.

It has nothing to do with NOT being a giant piece of shit rights crushing ban. Not at all.

Just because it's a "large red state" doesn't mean that they don't do some backwards ass shit that isn't right. Majority rules, minority rights. Do I need to explain this concept?

[Mach1]

Blue is the future!

[YALE]

Also, anyone that doesn't understand a judge's legislative rights is a moron. Judges make laws all the time, and the legitimacy of that goes back to the Saxon days in England. Common Law, bitches.

[Baron Von Crowder]

I just cant seem to grasp how this is something that the government, be it state, national, or municipal has any reason to have an opinion or regulate.

Two guys or to chicks want a marriage license? Take their money and be done with it. I dont know the numbers, and I may be way off base, but it would seem that holding up courts, probate for estates, etc for people denied marriage licenses would cost the state a good chunk of change. By just simply doing it, it would save a ton of money that could be better squandered elsewhere.