250,000 Muslims being brought to US Soil? Is this true?

[Maddhattter]

You have not and your claim is invalid.

You can keep saying that but it will never be true. I gave you the evidence to support the claims I've made, and I even reposted for TheKing when he asked for support for the same claim. As he was part of the initial conversation, I expected him to do nothing more that go "Nuh-uh!" since that's all he did the first time this conversation was had. I even gave you evidence that saved you time in having to come up with excuses because all the hand-waiving has already been done for you. So, I've literally given you both sides of the discussion already.

So, again, the only way you can honestly say that I've not provided evidence for the claims that I've made is if you are ignoring the evidence that I've provided. If you're not ignoring the evidence that I provided, then your statement is a lie.

Now, I will clarify, that I've only provided evidence to the claims that I've made. I've not provided, though I've informed you that someone else has supplied evidence to that effect, of any of the things you've made up and claimed I've said. So, if that's what you're claiming I've provided no evidence for, I'll concede that I'm not going to answer for the shit you make up.

With two sentences can you multi-quote your way into another labyrinth of grabastic crap?

Am I able to? Sure. However, the truth is always to much better to use because I don't have to make anything up. That's why, I've consistently responded to the claims you've made, in the context you've made them. I've not dishonestly attempted to claim you said something when you didn't, and I've not demanded that you account for things I've made up either.

From this point on, if you can manage to respond to what I've said, instead of making shit up, I'll be glad to continue this conversation. However, if you're going to continue making things up and claiming that I said them, there's no conversation to be had.

[SS Junk]

I have already provided evidence for all of the claims I've actually made. So, yes.

You have not and your claim is invalid. With two sentences can you multi-quote your way into another labyrinth of grabastic crap?

[Baba Ganoush]

Loud noises!!!!

[The King]

^^^^^
Good example of aforementioned hilarity

[Maddhattter]

Please supply evidence to support your claim from current times. Can you do that?

I have already provided evidence for all of the claims I've actually made. So, yes.

[SS Junk]

You ignoring it is the only way you don't see the evidence.

Please supply evidence to support your claim from current times. Can you do that?

[Maddhattter]

Not ignoring it.

You ignoring it is the only way you don't see the evidence.

I was wanting you to show some proof to your claim,

No, what you are asking for is nothing of the sort. You continuously asked me to prove things I did not claim, nor had any relevance to what I did claim.

and you've failed, which makes that statement invalid all in itself.

No, I provided evidence to support my statement, and even included you all the hand-waiving that you require to continue to pretend it doesn't exist. I just refused to repost something that's already posted in this thread because it has no relevance to my statements. So, not chasing after your strawmen is not a failure on my part, it's a fallacy on yours.

It's clear it's merely nothing more than ignorant banter.

If it's so clear, why can't you seem to actually address anything I've actually said instead of demanding that I support claims I never made? After all, that would be the honest thing to do.

You're not the first person to use it and the outcome is always the same.

I agree. Many people have said it before, and it's still supported by the evidence.

[SS Junk]

Not ignoring it. I was wanting you to show some proof to your claim, and you've failed, which makes that statement invalid all in itself. It's clear it's merely nothing more than ignorant banter. You're not the first person to use it and the outcome is always the same.

[Maddhattter]

In other words, you can't come up with examples from current times to back up your, "Islam is no more "kill anyone who disagrees" than christianity is." claim. Got it.

I've already addressed this. There's no point in repeating others as examples have already been given in this thread. You ignoring that doesn't change anything.

[ceyko]

Might as well move this to that religion forum that no one pays attention to.

[SS Junk]

This is all no more relevant than the first time you asked. So, can we be done with the strawmen? Is it possible to address what I've actually said?

In other words, you can't come up with examples from current times to back up your, "Islam is no more "kill anyone who disagrees" than christianity is." claim. Got it.

[Gasser64]

Same. You can tell he was quite concerned about it though. .look at all that long posting he did

must be Ben afleck

[The King]

I find the banter between MH and you guys hilarious.. and not for the same reasons you do.

Agreed, I find this site and internet personas in general to often be hilarious.

[lowthreeohz]

I find the banter between MH and you guys hilarious.. and not for the same reasons you do.

[Gasser64]

Funny how he talks about reading comprehension isn't it? When from reading his replies it doesn't look like he he has any