250,000 Muslims being brought to US Soil? Is this true?

[SEB]

This is what im talking about.http://www.dfwmustangs.net/forums/sh...ad.php?t=59995
Its just a matter of time before these Muslims force their way of life on us with these Pussy Ass Democrats in office and Obama. They want us all dead!!!

[Gasser64]

Nice Halloween costume. You going trick or treating?

[racrguy]

You said all religions. You should choose your blanket statements more carefully. Go ahead and frantically Google. I'll give you a hint...nah, I won't

Edit: I like the "move to mythology forum" tag.

You said all religions. You should choose your blanket statements more carefully. Go ahead and frantically Google. I'll give you a hint...nah, I won't

No matter how many times you change your screen name you just can't help yourself from getting into the same dumbass arguments time and time again, can you?

[Gasser64]

Now, we're back to the hand-waiving.

You said all religions. You should choose your blanket statements more carefully. Go ahead and frantically Google. I'll give you a hint...nah, I won't

[The King]

Yes, indeed you are.

[Maddhattter]

Google search, in all ways at least as authoritative as whatever source you choose to reference.

Now, we're back to the hand-waiving.

[The King]

Google search, in all ways at least as authoritative as whatever source you choose to reference.

[Maddhattter]

As did I, and you, yourself, have demonstrated nothing other than to support my claim.

You, unlike I, provided no sources. Least of all, authoritative sources.

[The King]

As did I, and you, yourself, have demonstrated nothing other than to support my claim.

[Maddhattter]

That is but one of the definitions offered up by a Google search. The fact that you chose a particular one to reference in no way diminishes the validity of other recognized definitions. Sorry, you're just not that qualified to do so.

Nothing I did diminishes the validity of other definitions. I used one from an actual authoritative source.

Whether you agree with my assertion also in no way diminishes the validity of same. Again, sorry but you're just not that qualified to do so.

I agree. The fact that your claim has no validity has nothing to do with me and my qualifications and more to do with the fact that something is not valid until it's been demonstrated, which you've not done.

[The King]

That is but one of the definitions offered up by a Google search. The fact that you chose a particular one to reference in no way diminishes the validity of other recognized definitions. Sorry, you're just not that qualified to do so.

Whether you agree with my assertion also in no way diminishes the validity of same. Again, sorry but you're just not that qualified to do so.

[Maddhattter]

Incorrect, defined by Google search...something you and others would identify with.

Nope. Even google disagrees with you... Google defines it as "a belief or set of beliefs held and taught by a church, political party, or other group". Same as the link I posted above.

In the end, all of them can arrive at the Truth, which in the case of Christianity is Biblical Truth.

And now we're just making more unsupported assertions. That didn't take long.

[The King]

Still trying to redefine words, I see....



The devil, as they say, is in the details. Unless they agree on everything, which they don't, then they are mutually exclusive. In the end, not all of them can be true.

Incorrect, defined by Google search...something you and others would identify with.

In the end, all of them can arrive at the Truth, which in the case of Christianity is Biblical Truth.

[Maddhattter]

Incorrect

Doctrine = system of teaching

Still trying to redefine words, I see....

Differing systems of teaching that reach the same conclusion are all inclusive, rather than exclusive.

The devil, as they say, is in the details. Unless they agree on everything, which they don't, then they are mutually exclusive. In the end, not all of them can be true.