Originally posted by Gasser64
View Post
Originally posted by Gasser64
For the sake of argument, even if we were to accept your claims as true, just because the person who started the religion claims, or is thought, to believe something has no bearing on the truth, validity, or morality of the religion itself. It's a clear cut genetic fallacy.
Originally posted by Gasser64
Originally posted by Gasser64
Originally posted by Gasser64
Originally posted by Gasser64
Originally posted by Gasser64
Originally posted by Gasser64
I never stated, nor implied, that your bigotry had anything to do with the color of anyone's skin. At least it's not often I see red herrings.
Originally posted by Gasser64
Second of all, based on your own statement, you are a bigot and you're proud of it. So, I don't see how this story is problematic.
Finally, who is "we"? Who else are you trying to drag down with you?
Originally posted by Gasser64
Originally posted by Gasser64
Originally posted by Gasser64
For example, even Jesus said he did not come to bring peace, but a sword. He also condemns the Pharisees for not washing his hands before eating. He defends himself by attacking them for not killing disobedient children according to the commandment: "He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death." Which god clearly agrees with seeing as he murdered 42 children for calling Elisha bald. Or how about when David bought his wife with 200 Philistine foreskins, even though the asking price was only 100? Oh, those christians, with their ""love thy neighbor" or some sh1t".
Originally posted by Gasser64
Originally posted by Gasser64
Also, I'm inclined to ask... Why do you keep bringing up that you're "not religious"? Thus far, I've not seen anyone claim that you are and not being "religious" doesn't actually mean anything. There are people who are clearly religious and claim that their not because they don't go to church or hold a mainline concept of their beliefs. It doesn't demonstrate that you're more capable of reason, more intelligent, or that you are somehow immune from bias. In fact, in the overwhelming majority of your posts, you've demonstrated that you are not capable of logical reasoning, you are proud of willful ignorance, and you perform special pleading regularly to attempt to confirm and reinforce your bias.
So, I'll reiterate, why do you feel that stating that is important or relevant? How is that supposed to have anything to do with this discussion?
Leave a comment: