Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama on TV right now assuring the USA is safe this weekend

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CWO
    replied
    an hour long, but worth it

    House Homeland Security Committee Chair Michael McCaul (R-TX) spoke about the state of homeland security at the National Defense University. He addressed the rise of radicalism, the terrorism threat to the United States, and America's role in winning the war against Islamist terrorism. He criticized President Obama's address to the nation from the Oval Office the previous day about the December 2, 2015, mass shooting in San Bernardino, California. Representative McCaul said the shooting was not an isolated incident and the nation remained at war.

    Leave a comment:


  • helosailor
    replied
    Originally posted by Z06killinsbf View Post
    I wonder how many people know we actually have target packages for taking out all government locations.
    Shhhh!

    Leave a comment:


  • Z06killinsbf
    replied
    I wonder how many people know we actually have target packages for taking out all government locations.

    Leave a comment:


  • helosailor
    replied
    Originally posted by Chili View Post
    Yeah, and any officers above you.. Pretty clear cut. Of course, under he UCMJ you still have an out (and obligation) to disobey unlawful orders.

    I would say that when it mentions 'all enemies, foreign and domestic', it is referring to enemies of the United States, not necessarily 'violators' of the constitution. As an example, ISIS terrorists that may be US Citizens, like the San Bernardino shooter.

    Originally posted by BP View Post
    Also note that officers have a different oath, there is no mention of the president or following orders. That and National Guard enlisted soldiers add their state's governor in after the president and officers.
    Yep!
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...Oath_of_Office

    Leave a comment:


  • BP
    replied
    Also note that officers have a different oath, there is no mention of the president or following orders. That and National Guard enlisted soldiers add their state's governor in after the president and officers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chili
    replied
    Originally posted by BP View Post
    There is a little more to that oath. The president is still in charge.
    Yeah, and any officers above you.. Pretty clear cut. Of course, under he UCMJ you still have an out (and obligation) to disobey unlawful orders.

    I would say that when it mentions 'all enemies, foreign and domestic', it is referring to enemies of the United States, not necessarily 'violators' of the constitution. As an example, ISIS terrorists that may be US Citizens, like the San Bernardino shooter.

    Leave a comment:


  • helosailor
    replied
    Originally posted by BP View Post
    There is a little more to that oath. The president is still in charge.
    Yep, every word does apply.

    Leave a comment:


  • BP
    replied

    I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
    There is a little more to that oath. The president is still in charge.

    Leave a comment:


  • bcoop
    replied
    Maybe we just need to replace Denny's keyboard, and everything else will go away.

    Leave a comment:


  • bubbaearl
    replied
    maybe we need to send buses through trailer parks this time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Right but we don't start it. Unless you really want what you're asking for. Do you want to live under a military dictatorship?

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    I hate when I get asked that same question.

    "Why aren't you taking Washington back? You took an oath!"

    Right, I did. I will protect and defend the constitution but it's not the military's job to remove a tyrannous government, that's the people's job. It's our job not to be in the way and to minimize casualties.

    Leave a comment:


  • 564826
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    Are you aware of what you're asking? A military takeover of the country, martial law and full suspension of your constitutional rights. All of them. No trial by jury, no right to remain silent, no search warrants.

    Do you REALLY want that?
    Yeah.. But but it seems so cool and easy in the movies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by Gasser64 View Post
    Right, so those who took the oath, and have the perfect means, are cleared. Makes total sense. Hey lets all just pass it around like a hot potato!

    Don't get me wrong, I'm all for holding politicians to their oath as well. The way they handled the higher ups in the french revolution sounds like an excellent idea to me.
    Are you aware of what you're asking? A military takeover of the country, martial law and full suspension of your constitutional rights. All of them. No trial by jury, no right to remain silent, no search warrants.

    Do you REALLY want that?

    Leave a comment:


  • 4bangen
    replied
    Originally posted by Tremor14 View Post
    This forum has gone to shit!
    well... bye

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X