Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BLM at it again.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jammeejamm
    replied
    the trend i see in these is they typically start with someone in a government agency getting all uppity about a common peasant telling him or her no.

    i have read quite a bit, be it all internet articles and wikipedia, about ruby ridge and not so much regarding the others, but the stories all seem to start the same. someone told the government to fuck off, and then came the thunder.

    Leave a comment:


  • SBFORDTECH
    replied
    Originally posted by Gargamel View Post
    I hate to lump in what has to be a great majority of good people at the FBI.... However it all starts at the top (Washington).

    Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    As true today as ever.

    Many of these issues will start to be solved when states start taking their power back from "that city back east" that was never supposed to have that type of power in the first place.
    Amen

    Leave a comment:


  • Gargamel
    replied
    I hate to lump in what has to be a great majority of good people at the FBI.... However it all starts at the top (Washington).

    Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

    As true today as ever.

    Many of these issues will start to be solved when states start taking their power back from "that city back east" that was never supposed to have that type of power in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chili
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    And they never are punished for their actions
    Or not adequately, at least.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    And they never are punished for their actions

    Leave a comment:


  • Chili
    replied
    Lea and I started talking about the Branch Davidians / Waco Siege over the weekend, which led to me reading more about it. Back when it happened I only saw glimpses of the events on the news and read headlines, but never really found out the whole story (which also led to some reading into Ruby Ridge).

    The feds' actions in this is right in line with the shit that went down then, and is only further cementing how fucking terrible our federal law enforcement actually is. Add their actions regarding the Russia investigation and it's not hard to see how so many have lost all faith in Washington.

    Leave a comment:


  • SBFORDTECH
    replied
    Originally posted by SS Junk View Post
    Isn't there phone video from inside the truck where bullets can be heard striking the truck after it stopped in the snow bank?

    Leave a comment:


  • SS Junk
    replied
    Originally posted by SBFORDTECH View Post
    Astarita's lawyer claimed the indictment was based on "junk science.''
    Isn't there phone video from inside the truck where bullets can be heard striking the truck after it stopped in the snow bank?

    Leave a comment:


  • Strychnine
    replied
    Originally posted by SBFORDTECH View Post
    Astarita's lawyer claimed the indictment was based on "junk science.''
    LOL that's some real Lionel Hutz defense right there.

    Leave a comment:


  • SBFORDTECH
    replied
    The information was revealed Friday in a 32-page government response to FBI Agent W. Joseph Astarita's motion to dismiss his federal indictment. Astarita, accused of lying about firing two rifle shots on Jan. 26, 2016, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of making false statements and two counts of obstruction of justice.


    Prosecutors say witness testimony, audio and video evidence, plus bullet trajectory analysis yielded one conclusion: FBI agent W. Joseph Astarita lied about firing two shots at the truck of refuge occupation spokesman Robert "LaVoy" Finicum in 2016 after he swerved into a snowbank.

    The information is detailed in a 32-page government response to Astarita's motion to dismiss the federal indictment against him. He's pleaded not guilty to three counts of making false statements and two counts of obstruction of justice. Astarita's lawyer claimed the indictment was based on "junk science.''

    Leave a comment:


  • SBFORDTECH
    replied
    The information was revealed Friday in a 32-page government response to FBI Agent W. Joseph Astarita's motion to dismiss his federal indictment. Astarita, accused of lying about firing two rifle shots on Jan. 26, 2016, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of making false statements and two counts of obstruction of justice.


    Prosecutors say witness testimony, audio and video evidence, plus bullet trajectory analysis yielded one conclusion: FBI agent W. Joseph Astarita lied about firing two shots at the truck of refuge occupation spokesman Robert "LaVoy" Finicum in 2016 after he swerved into a snowbank.

    The information is detailed in a 32-page government response to Astarita's motion to dismiss the federal indictment against him. He's pleaded not guilty to three counts of making false statements and two counts of obstruction of justice. Astarita's lawyer claimed the indictment was based on "junk science.''

    Leave a comment:


  • sc281
    replied
    Lmao!

    Leave a comment:


  • SBFORDTECH
    replied
    Acquittals in the Nevada case.


    Leave a comment:


  • Jimbo
    replied
    Investigators said a member of the FBI's elite Hostage Rescue Team fired at Finicum as his pickup crashed into a snow bank at a roadblock on U.S. 395 when he evaded a police stop during the occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The agent's shots didn't hit Finicum, and they were not divulged to Oregon investigators.

    LaVoy Finicum shooting: FBI agent indicted for alleged false statements

    Leave a comment:


  • SBFORDTECH
    replied
    Originally posted by Denny
    I heard you killed Alpha Quatro.
    It wasn't me. The Feds did it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X