Kathy Griffin: 'I beg for your forgiveness' for gruesome anti-Trump photo shoot

[txminime]

You know what this REALLY is? This is conservatives finally realize it is "OK" to fight back when liberals crossed the line. Eight years of GWB taking it on the chin, followed by eight more years of playing the silent victims under Obama is finally coming to a stop with Trump in the WH. This is the sound of the silent majority finally taking a stand.

As for Kathy... put on your big girl pants and take the consequences of your own actions like the "strong, independent woman" that your side have boasted all this time. Crying is for little girls...

[AnthonyS]

Eight years of O after Bush did this. You couldn't even say bad things about O without libtards going all KGB on you. Now libtards think it's okay to make death threats to the President because their lame horse couldn't race.

[Trip McNeely]

Please drop her off in Syria, by way of C-5 bay door.

[Sean88gt]

I actually agree with Jim Carrey. There shouldn't be limited.

As to Ms. Griffin...

[Jimbo]

http://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2010/05/26/playing-with-fire-and-an-obama-effigy/

In order to qualify for First Amendment protection, the speech must be “sufficiently imbued with elements of communication.” Spence v. Washington, 418 U.S. 405, 409 (1974).

Without being able to figure out whether there was a message in the first place and what the content of the message was, it becomes even more difficult to determine that there is a great “likelihood . . . that the message would be understood by those who viewed it,” as is also required for symbolic speech to be subject to First Amendment protection. Spence, 418 U.S. at 410-11.