Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Suit over national day or prayer dimissed...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The King
    replied
    Is that a promise? Did it really only take your moronic ass only five whole days to compose such a grade school level retort?

    Just think, if you'd have devoted a couple more days you might could have figured out how to include one of the queer smilies you wuv so much.

    Leave a comment:


  • VaderTT
    replied
    Originally posted by The King View Post
    Gotta love a Wikipedia search moron. That's why innernet forums are so much fun, we get to see less than mediocrity from such retards on a steady basis.
    You sir are a useless faggot!!!!! I shal not address you anymore!

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Well, there always agnosticism which accepts the possibility of a god but explicitly says there is no way we can know.

    I think I fall under the traditional definition of atheist in that I truly do not believe there is a god. I can accept that god is a possibility, however, I don't see that as falling outside the definition of atheism. I don't think that qualifies wholly as agnostic either, because I see it as a possibility to prove gods existence and, more remotely, disprove it eventually.

    One thing I am more adamant on, I don't believe the Bible to be a history book. Good moral stories and guidance, some sprinkling of historical events, but mostly folklore.

    Leave a comment:


  • SMEGMA STENCH
    replied
    I don't recall. I don't think I ever said "Exlude, you stoopid!!" early on in the thread like you're saying. So I can't say I know where you're coming up with that. You seem to argue better than most of the people around here so even if I think you're a little misguided and have an undeserved superiority complex, that doesn't mean I think you're stupid.

    Now if you're referring to my broad generalizations that I'm so fond of, I guess you didn't read the entire thread. As it was established that there is in fact more than one type of atheist. I was already sort of aware of that, but I wasn't sure that everyone here who was claiming to be an atheist was. I have only heard the difference referred to as "strong atheism" and "weak atheism". It would seem that the kind that are "stupid" are racecardouche and his ilk. Vardette is treading near there with his "magical man in the sky" comments. Although I still have to stand by the literal definition of an atheist, and my assessment that there needs to be a better term (which I'm sure there already is) to describe the other "atheists". Which again, going by the literal definition, there seems to be only one actual atheist here. As the definition does not seem to go into allowing for proof.

    And uh, I just didn't want to be one of those whiny people crying about their lost post count. I don't want to be grouped in with those who care about something that insignificant. So I opted not to participate in that. I like to think that I have worth far outside of how many posts I have on some website somewhere on teh internets
    Last edited by SMEGMA STENCH; 04-22-2011, 01:03 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Tweedle, by your own standards you lost this before it even started. You're very first post was calling people stupid. Thus the hypocrisy I mentioned earlier that you've been too inept to catch. This has been no debate, just me reminding you, as one of many, that you are no one to be labeling anyone as such.

    Must be embarrassing to have attained, in these few short months, the same stigmas and standards you had on the old board that had you wanting to change your name.

    Leave a comment:


  • The King
    replied
    Originally posted by vaderfag View Post
    The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.

    – Richard Dawkins

    It is not as in the Bible, that God created man in his own image. But, on the contrary, man created God in his own image. – Ludwig Feuerbach
    Gotta love a Wikipedia search moron. That's why innernet forums are so much fun, we get to see less than mediocrity from such retards on a steady basis.

    Leave a comment:


  • SMEGMA STENCH
    replied
    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    And as has been realized over and over, you're too stupid to realize you're stupid. Of course, people don't blame you for this.

    They just let you know you're stupid. I'm sure you rationalize this by thinking that everyone who tells you you're stupid is in turn stupid because you're mother would never lie to you!

    I must be right about the JustinSN95, as you continue to dodge the question. It would very much answer why you are Paladin light.
    And now we come to the end of the debate. When the losing side has to resort to name calling cause he can't come up with an actual argument to facilitate his point. Man for someone who is so "smart" (haha) you really don't show it. As for being justinsn95, I could be one of a great many people who you failed to impress by being a know it all. I guess you'll never really know will you?

    I can see your next reply already. Essentially: "You stupid!! You stupid!!" ROFL..greatness. Do yourself a favor and slink away in shame while you still have any form of dignity left.

    Originally posted by vadertt View Post
    No you can't grasp that god is a fictonal character made up by man to take the blame off of our mistakes. I.E. " why did this happen? OOOHHH IDK I guess its just gods way." lol

    But I do respect theat you firmly believe in something. I usually don't talk religion or politics though for this reason.
    Oh. I can't? I see you didn't actually address the point and lash out with a poor defense of your point of view. Cause after all, if this thread has established anything, its that no one really knows for sure. You must be one of the hater atheists that I've come to love.
    Last edited by SMEGMA STENCH; 04-21-2011, 09:48 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • VaderTT
    replied
    Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View Post
    I never liked Dawkins because he can't grasp that a god is not a human. He puts human characteristics and personifications on something that clearly be.. not human.
    No you can't grasp that god is a fictonal character made up by man to take the blame off of our mistakes. I.E. " why did this happen? OOOHHH IDK I guess its just gods way." lol

    But I do respect theat you firmly believe in something. I usually don't talk religion or politics though for this reason.


    It is not as in the Bible, that God created man in his own image. But, on the contrary, man created God in his own image.

    – Ludwig Feuerbach

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View Post
    You're not smarter than me, I'm afraid. You're not any smarter than most of the people on this board. So be damn sure all you like, it'll never make it true. Unlike you, I feel no need to go around proclaiming my intellect. So to someone like you, I can see where someone not having your self affirming attitude must seem "not smart". In any argument you get into, you never cease trumpeting how smart you are. And I'm not mistaking your wrongfully expressed superiority over me as a complex. I'm taking your wrongfully expressed superiority over most of the people you talk to here, as a complex. Don't feel bad though, as here you'll blend in just fine with all the rest of the would be intellectuals.
    And as has been realized over and over, you're too stupid to realize you're stupid. Of course, people don't blame you for this.

    They just let you know you're stupid. I'm sure you rationalize this by thinking that everyone who tells you you're stupid is in turn stupid because you're mother would never lie to you!

    I must be right about the JustinSN95, as you continue to dodge the question. It would very much answer why you are Paladin light.

    Leave a comment:


  • SMEGMA STENCH
    replied
    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    Don't mistake my expressed superiority over you as a superiority complex. I'm damn sure I'm smarter than you which is all that matters between the two of us. I may be known as a jackass, arrogant, or an asshole, but not as stupid amongst "us".

    And who is this "us"? Your multiple personalities.
    You're not smarter than me, I'm afraid. You're not any smarter than most of the people on this board. So be damn sure all you like, it'll never make it true. Unlike you, I feel no need to go around proclaiming my intellect. So to someone like you, I can see where someone not having your self affirming attitude must seem "not smart". In any argument you get into, you never cease trumpeting how smart you are. And I'm not mistaking your wrongfully expressed superiority over me as a complex. I'm taking your wrongfully expressed superiority over most of the people you talk to here, as a complex. Don't feel bad though, as here you'll blend in just fine with all the rest of the would be intellectuals.

    Originally posted by vadertt View Post
    The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.

    – Richard Dawkins
    I never liked Dawkins because he can't grasp that a god is not a human. He puts human characteristics and personifications on something that clearly be.. not human.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Actually, in the Old Testament, we were under the law and when you broke it, you got hammered. Justice was swift and bloody. Under the New, we have grace. Kind of like going before a judge with an attorney

    Leave a comment:


  • VaderTT
    replied
    The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.

    – Richard Dawkins

    It is not as in the Bible, that God created man in his own image. But, on the contrary, man created God in his own image. – Ludwig Feuerbach

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    And you skipped my question, are you/were you JustinSN95?

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Originally posted by StanleyTweedle View Post
    I guess you can add the fact that you're a blind man to the list. Do you just skip over the other posts that hold the opposite point of view? I know damn well how many people see me as an idiot. The fact that you point this out only lends more credence to my theory of your undeserved superiority complex. Just don't think you're fooling anyone. Cause you're not. And WTF is geocites? Although I'm pretty sure even multiple PHD's wouldn't add up to enough "proof" for someone who's as "smart" as you LOL. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are dude, and its laughably obvious to the rest of us.

    Don't mistake my expressed superiority over you as a superiority complex. I'm damn sure I'm smarter than you which is all that matters between the two of us. I may be known as a jackass, arrogant, or an asshole, but not as stupid amongst "us".

    And who is this "us"? Your multiple personalities.

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    Exlude, I'm pointing out that a bachelors degree does not make you an expert any more than a bachelors degree in criminal justice makes me an attorney. You seem to get upset that I'm pointing out your belief in the theory of evolution requires just as much faith, if not more, than my belief in God.

    Well you surely know more about criminal law than I do, which is my point. I'm no expert on evolution, but I'm far more educated and experienced with it than 99% of this board. In case you missed my discussion with Denny, I agree that there is faith in science. But we have witnessed evolution. Enough to make it law? Not at all, but your posts were overly simplified. And equating the people who recognize the evidence for evolution to "third graders who don't know the alphabet"? Cmon...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X