Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Suit over national day or prayer dimissed...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SMEGMA STENCH
    replied
    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    Maybe you should stick to CJ then? And no, I've actually had hands on with polyploidyism as well as transcription error rates. Outside of an Intro to Bio class, CJ nor Psych cover a whole lot of Evo last I checked.

    Tweedle, you are alone here. Just look at how many people see you as an idiot...

    You're JustinSN95 aren't you? I remember an equally moronic rhetoric when I asked you to prove something with more than a Geocities reference.
    I guess you can add the fact that you're a blind man to the list. Do you just skip over the other posts that hold the opposite point of view? I know damn well how many people see me as an idiot. The fact that you point this out only lends more credence to my theory of your undeserved superiority complex. Just don't think you're fooling anyone. Cause you're not. And WTF is geocites? Although I'm pretty sure even multiple PHD's wouldn't add up to enough "proof" for someone who's as "smart" as you LOL. You're not nearly as smart as you think you are dude, and its laughably obvious to the rest of us.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Exlude, I'm pointing out that a bachelors degree does not make you an expert any more than a bachelors degree in criminal justice makes me an attorney. You seem to get upset that I'm pointing out your belief in the theory of evolution requires just as much faith, if not more, than my belief in God.

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Maybe you should stick to CJ then? And no, I've actually had hands on with polyploidyism as well as transcription error rates. Outside of an Intro to Bio class, CJ nor Psych cover a whole lot of Evo last I checked.

    Tweedle, you are alone here. Just look at how many people see you as an idiot...

    You're JustinSN95 aren't you? I remember an equally moronic rhetoric when I asked you to prove something with more than a Geocities reference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    Not true.

    Namely in plants, bacteria, and insects. Nothing in mammals that we have found yet, which tends to be the crutch that creationists hold on to. Unfortunately, we have not been studying it long enough to see macro evolution in mammals. But if you look at organisms with the much faster reproduction rates, we absolutely, 100% see it in nature.

    Not only that, but the only logical result of microevolution is macroevolution.

    But I'm just a third grader who hasn't learned the alphabet, I don't have a BS in Biology or anything.
    So what you are saying, is you have faith based on what you have read in a book. You have no personal experience with evolution but you trust those who say they do. Right? And I have a BS in Criminal justice and will graduate with a masters in psychology but I'm not Sherlock Holmes now am I?

    Leave a comment:


  • SMEGMA STENCH
    replied
    Yeah actually you got that wrong. Now don't try to backpedal and get out of it... haha

    Oh crap... didn't end that sentence with a period. Here we go again...



    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    No, despite your desperate attempts to analyze something deeper, it's simply funny when a moron fucks up something simple when trying to insult someone's intelligence.

    As the meme once went, "your stupied".
    There's no need to attempt to analyze something deeper, when its always jumped right off the page at me. Its not that deep. Its actually pretty obvious to people that read your posts, and if you'd actually read their replies instead of just trying to find the best way to defend yourself and try to be the spelling police again, you'd realize this. Everyone here knows you're notorious for this. I can't believe you'd actually think that people don't notice.

    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    I do find it odd you completely jumped my original point of your hypocrisy in favor of the backpedal.
    Please outline for me, any hypocrisy that wasn't discussed in full in this thread.
    Last edited by SMEGMA STENCH; 04-21-2011, 10:55 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • The King
    replied
    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    No, despite your desperate attempts to analyze something deeper, it's simply funny when a moron fucks up something simple when trying to insult someone's intelligence.

    As the meme once went, "your stupied".
    Didn't you mean "your teh stupied"?

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    I do find it odd you completely jumped my original point of your hypocrisy in favor of the backpedal.

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    No, despite your desperate attempts to analyze something deeper, it's simply funny when a moron fucks up something simple when trying to insult someone's intelligence.

    As the meme once went, "your stupied".

    Leave a comment:


  • SMEGMA STENCH
    replied
    Originally posted by racrguy View Post
    I'm just going to leave this here. And it's going to be my last post in this thread.

    faith
    noun \ˈfāth\
    plural faiths \ˈfāths, sometimes ˈfāthz\
    Definition of FAITH
    1
    a : allegiance to duty or a person : loyalty b (1) : fidelity to one's promises (2) : sincerity of intentions
    2
    a (1) : belief and trust in and loyalty to God (2) : belief in the traditional doctrines of a religion b (1) : firm belief in something for which there is no proof (2) : complete trust

    Evolution and the scientific view of the universe both require proof in order to be true.
    I could be misunderstanding you here, but I'm sure you'll correct me if I am. But you're coming off to me as someone who thinks that there has to be proof for something to exist. We probably wouldn't believe some of the things that actually exist, if told by someone (or some thing) that had witnessed them. As they say, truth is stranger than fiction. Plenty of things exist for which there is no current proof.

    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    Yeah, take a lesson from JKD, Stanley. The backpedal is less than glamorous, especially in the name of "poetic license". Lol

    I find a very specific humor in people insulting my intelligence (or should I say "inteligence") while using words that don't exist.
    Sarcasm and mockery are pretty different from backpedaling. And I don't know where you came up with the "inteligence" thing, but I guess.... what... you don't believe in typos either? Uh oh. I just screwed up. I began a sentence with the word "and". Sigh... I guess you'll be calling me out on that now. Man I really need to learn to watch myself more, when I'm around you. Knowing that if one fiber is out of place on my shirt, you'll be all over it. Does that like... make you feel superior or something? I guess maybe for some psychologically diagnosable reason, you get off on trying to make people feel dumb?

    Even if they don't mention it, people can see through that, just fyi. (crap I don't think I was supposed to create a new paragraph right there) I mean I know that there are plenty of people here that you could easily make fun of for this stuff, and you'd actually be right cause they don't know it. But its just extremely petty and makes you seem like some kind of wannabe brainy know it all. But let me guess, this is still just some attempt to "backpedal" by me right? Man. I'm kinda glad I don't really know you in real life cause I'd probably have to avoid you a lot on sheer principle.

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    Micro evolution is, Maco is not.
    Not true.

    Namely in plants, bacteria, and insects. Nothing in mammals that we have found yet, which tends to be the crutch that creationists hold on to. Unfortunately, we have not been studying it long enough to see macro evolution in mammals. But if you look at organisms with the much faster reproduction rates, we absolutely, 100% see it in nature.

    Not only that, but the only logical result of microevolution is macroevolution.

    But I'm just a third grader who hasn't learned the alphabet, I don't have a BS in Biology or anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    Originally posted by exlude View Post
    The theory of evolution doesn't address or is it intended to address the origination of matter. A lot of people confuse that. Evolution is a natural, observable, and testable occurrence.
    Micro evolution is, Maco is not.

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Originally posted by Forever_frost View Post
    I don't backpedal. If I'm wrong, so be it. If there is no faith involved in the 'scientific' view of things, then where did the matter come from that began things and how did humans develop the unique combination of attributes that allow intelligence and a dominance of the world when there are definite gaps in the evolution theory?

    The theory of evolution doesn't address or is it intended to address the origination of matter. A lot of people confuse that. Evolution is a natural, observable, and testable occurrence.

    Leave a comment:


  • GSRGuy94
    replied
    It's an *evolving* theory (see what I did there?). There is constant work being done gathering new information and improving ideas. You act like there are no definite gaps in Genesis.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forever_frost
    replied
    I don't backpedal. If I'm wrong, so be it. If there is no faith involved in the 'scientific' view of things, then where did the matter come from that began things and how did humans develop the unique combination of attributes that allow intelligence and a dominance of the world when there are definite gaps in the evolution theory?

    Leave a comment:


  • exlude
    replied
    Yeah, take a lesson from JKD, Stanley. The backpedal is less than glamorous, especially in the name of "poetic license". Lol

    I find a very specific humor in people insulting my intelligence (or should I say "inteligence") while using words that don't exist.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X