Originally posted by pHILSANITY07
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Black Bird was bad ass
Collapse
X
-
I didnt know if that was true or not, if the rumor I heard is correct The Mig 25's engines are like a 1 time use engine. IDK if that is true or not.Originally posted by bottlerocket View PostThe Mig 25 came out before the XB70...Los Angeles Rams 11-5
Last Game - Loss vs. San Fransisco
Up Next - vs. Atlanta
2017 NFC West Division Champions
Comment
-
Not just the speed. The altitude was a factor as well. The SR-71 boasts of fl8000, and 3m. The mig25 was made to match the speed of the Blackbird but not the altitude.Originally posted by 46Tbird View PostAbout three times the thrust actually, and about five times the loaded weight. Since the question was about acceleration, and F=MA, the MiG-25 has a good chance of out-accelerating the SR71. That is assuming that we have the correct values, which we probably don't.
There may be high-speed unmanned stealth drones out there being used by the CIA, but it's a pretty safe bet that the Blackbird series are the fastest air-breathing manned aircraft that have ever been, or will be, developed.
Anyone that thinks that slightly-stealthy manned Mach-3 aircraft are capable of gaining better intelligence than satellites is out of their f'ing mind.
They would take a high speed run at the SR-71 to max altitude(dam neer coffin corner stall their planes!) and then fire missiles (air to air). The air to air was indeed way faster then the SR-71,combined with the speed of the MIG-25 made the Blackbird vulnerable for the first time.
One of my previous airlines I worked for, we had a D.O. (Director of Operations) Ross S. that was a sled driver and this was told to a few of us over scotch one evening.
There were fewer SR-71 pilots than astronauts!
R
Comment
-
That's my favorite plane.Originally posted by garycrist View PostSR get all the press! Check out the videos of the B-70. Notice how the paint is burned off too! We could do so much back then too. In today's U.S.A. it will never happen.
When the government pays, the government controls.
Comment
-
Last edited by likeitfast55; 06-16-2011, 09:41 AM.
Comment
-
I watched a documentary a couple of weeks ago about the SR-71 that said, when they were testing the radar signature of the plane with a half sized model, they had a schedule of the Russian spy satellites fly-over times and would disassemble the model, bring into the building, then take it back out, and reassemble it after the fly-overs to continue testing. It said they had to do it several times during the day. They even went as far as painting the ground with dark paint (to make hot spots) shaped like some other plane since the Russian satellites used thermal-imaging, and the shadow of the radar test model would leave a cool spot on the ground shaped like the plane. Cool shit.Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View PostCommon misconception. Satellites are easy to avoid, they can be timed, and usually they can only photograph one location 1 maybe 2 times a day for a short span. ....
StevoOriginally posted by SSMAN...Welcome to the land of "Fuck it". No body cares, and if they do, no body cares.

Comment
-
Many SR-71's carried much more than just optic devices for intelligence gathering. On many occasions, a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) was carried in the nose, also a ground mapping radar was used from time to time. Mission specific electronic equipment was carried on-board such as assemblies that would identify and store electronic signatures of Russian search and SAM radars identified during their flights. Many flights had these boxes that were built specifically for that one mission. As other missions required different information, these boxes were either reconfigured for the information required or totally new, one time use boxes for special missions were rapidly built for the various customer needs.Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View Post..........The problem with the SR-71 is they never wanted to retrofit the aircraft for live data transmission. The SR-71 still relied on film, which had to return to base, be extracted, developed, and distributed to commanders.Mustangs previously owned:
1967 Coupe V8 (My first car)
1992 LX AOD
1993 LX Drag Car
1995 GTS
1997 Cobra
2000 Cobra R
2002 Corvette C5 A4 10.64@ 127.1
Undercover SC Dragster 8.10's
In the garage now....
2016 Honda Accord Touring
2015 F-150 Silver 5.0 XLT SuperCrew, like new condition
Retired 2008 after 41 years as an EE at LTV (Garland)/TI/Raytheon. Enjoying ham radio now.
Comment
-
Basically they were filled with enough to get them in the air and refueled completely.
Note the stain on the ground around the plane:
Last edited by 71chevellejohn; 05-26-2011, 11:12 PM..
Comment
-
Service ceiling for the later 25's was FL800Originally posted by likeitfast55 View PostNot just the speed. The altitude was a factor as well. The SR-71 boasts of fl8000, and 3m. The mig25 was made to match the speed of the Blackbird but not the altitude.
They would take a high speed run at the SR-71 to max altitude(dam neer coffin corner stall their planes!) and then fire missiles (air to air). The air to air was indeed way faster then the SR-71,combined with the speed of the MIG-25 made the Blackbird vulnerable for the first time.
One of my previous airlines I worked for, we had a D.O. (Director of Operations) Ross S. that was a sled driver and this was told to a few of us over scotch one evening.
There were fewer SR-71 pilots than astronauts!
R
Yep thats correct. 4 years after the specs for the XB-70 were drafted, the requirements for the new Soviet interceptor were laid out.aOriginally posted by 46Tbird View Post...but it still came after the specification was developed for a Mach 3 intercontinental bomber.
Comment
Comment