Originally posted by jdgregory84
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ZL1/GT500 on same dyno
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostMe too. I supposed that the situation could be that the reservoir isn't big enough in the GM system and repeated starving of the scavenge side means the reservoir gets depleted. Not sure exactly though. I guess I'm going to have to pull a Dr. Google now. lol
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View PostWell yes I understand that, but in this application (starving) I was under the understanding a dry sump prevented it since there the feed system had no air in it, and was under pressure from a separate reservoir.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostNo, the point is to reduce windage. Instead of having a bunch of oil flying around in the oil pan creating drag on the crankshaft, it gets sucked out by the pump and put into a tank where it is distributed from there.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by quikag View PostYep, depends on what you want to do. For 1/4 mile work, the '13 GT500 is going to be a few grand from running 9's and 10's all day long. For road course work, I'd still get the C6Z personally.
Both are sweet cars for sure in their own special ways.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostYou know you want one...
If she decides to wait Ill end up with my dad's c6 and go for the national stock cid record, which should be fairly easy with what I have planned. C6z or a Shelby are back-ups if my pop's loves his car when we finish first round of mods and decides to keep it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by quikag View PostYep, depends on what you want to do. For 1/4 mile work, the '13 GT500 is going to be a few grand from running 9's and 10's all day long. For road course work, I'd still get the C6Z personally.
Both are sweet cars for sure in their own special ways.
Leave a comment:
-
The GT500 is a fast SOB. Check out this 75-160mph vid a guy posted on youtube:
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Steve View PostYou can't go wrong with either one.
Both are sweet cars for sure in their own special ways.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Broncojohnny View PostNo, the point is to reduce windage. Instead of having a bunch of oil flying around in the oil pan creating drag on the crankshaft, it gets sucked out by the pump and put into a tank where it is distributed from there.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: