Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2013 Boss 302 versus 2012 CTS-V
Collapse
X
-
-
Your post is even more retarded because the Boss and V are much closer in acceleration than a V would be against a new GT500. The new GT500 would work a nearly stock V. It would be a boring video.Originally posted by SMKR View PostBugatti has no relation to either car in the original post, so your post was fucking stupid. Put a mustang up against the ctsv that is more comprable.Ford
GM
Toyota
VAG
Comment
-
I wonder how many Boss owners use the car for what it's made for (which isn't drag racing).HD Parts
paul@maverickhd.com
Comment
-
No more than the original Boss 302 was used for I'm sure, a lot of those Trans Am series cars saw plenty of time on the drag strip instead of the road course.Originally posted by 89stangGT View PostI wonder how many Boss owners use the car for what it's made for (which isn't drag racing)."It's another burrito, it's a cold Lone Star in my hand!"
Comment
-
Maybe a handful if even that.Originally posted by 89stangGT View PostI wonder how many Boss owners use the car for what it's made for (which isn't drag racing).2010 F-350 6.4L SRW CC 4X4
Spartan tunes, 5 inch flo-pro, 4 inch down pipe, cold side piping, AFE stage 2 CAI, EGR delete, Air Dog II
2012 Mustang 5.0 GT Stock........for now.
Comment
-
People act like they were surprised that a 575hp car beat a 444hp car from a roll. I predicted the outcome before we ran them... I knew. Than after I heard he had a CAI, it was just a metter of how much more to me... lol
I've owned/own several "fast" cars... Figuring the out who is going to win isn't rocket science. If the car down beat the CTS-V, then that would have been worth talking about.
Guys seriously.. Hp to weight is 10 hp for ever100 lbs..
Weight advantage 650-700 lbs...
Cts-v +120..
= boss still down 50 to 60 hp..
Seems like a no brainer
As far as the auto numbers.. I dont care what the dyno reads. The a6 is faster and quicker than the manual.. Do research..
Again the cts v was modded vs a stock boss.. The magazines all have the cts-v 117-119 in the magazines vs 114-115 for the boss stock before the extra 25 hp from the cai added by the cts-v.. Again, you have to be niave to think the out come would be different.
This was no more about shits and giggles reunion and fun between two friends.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Last edited by xstang; 06-17-2012, 08:35 PM.Slow C6..
Few bolt-ons...
Comment
-
What about the 13 Boss pulling the ZL1 on Tech? 444>580... Completely nulifies your benchrace math since the Camaro weighs the same or less than a 4dr V and has basically the same engine.Originally posted by xstang View PostPeople act like they were surprised that a 575hp car beat a 444hp car from a roll. I predicted the outcome before we ran them... I knew. Than after I heard he had a CAI, it was just a metter of how much more to me... lol
I've owned/own several "fast" cars... Figuring the out who is going to win isn't rocket science. If the car down beat the CTS-V, then that would have been worth talking about.
Guys seriously.. Hp to weight is 10 hp for ever100 lbs..
Weight advantage 650-700 lbs...
Cts-v +120..
= boss still down 50 to 60 hp..
Seems like a no brainer
As far as the auto numbers.. I dont care what the dyno reads. The a6 is faster and quicker than the manual.. Do research..
Again the cts v was modded vs a stock boss.. The magazines all have the cts-v 117-119 in the magazines vs 114-115 for the boss stock before the extra 25 hp from the cai added by the cts-v.. Again, you have to be niave to think the out come would be different.
This was no more about shits and giggles reunion and fun between two friends.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment
Comment