Originally posted by 91CoupeMike
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Finally a daily driver for 91coupemike
Collapse
X
-
His car is not so stock either. Also, it needs a re-tune pretty bad. He isn't exactly a conservative driver either. At all. lolOriginally posted by JC316 View PostWow, thats bad. My LS1 makes similar power and is in a heavier car and I still get 17 city...Originally posted by BuzzoSome dudes jump out of airplanes, I fuck hookers without condoms.
sigpic
Comment
-
-
Is your car a 6spd? The ls series is known for respectable gas mileage.Originally posted by JC316 View PostMine isn't modded to the extent that his is, but it does have bolt ons. Neither am I.
He also lives IN the city. Denton has a whole lot more lights and traffic than Kaufman does.Originally posted by BuzzoSome dudes jump out of airplanes, I fuck hookers without condoms.
sigpic
Comment
-
Yeah, but the 6th gear isn't usable until I am over 55MPH. Even then it's at about 1400rpm. Oh I know, the LS series of motor is great for MPG's, but with so much less weight, I figured that Mike would be closer on the MPG's.Originally posted by crapstang View PostIs your car a 6spd? The ls series is known for respectable gas mileage.
He also lives IN the city. Denton has a whole lot more lights and traffic than Kaufman does.
Comment
-
I work 3 miles from work so it never fully warms up, and I get about 16.5-18 mpg depending on if it's summer or winter. Around 20-21 hwy at 70mph.
The trucks instant mpg readout is at 17.1 mpg lol
I'm constantly over 2000 rpm too, I hate using 5th unless I'm going over 50.
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
-
-
Ah, that sounds more on par. Oh and that truck lies it's ass off, that or they did a LOT of highway driving. I have only seen two computers that calculate MPG's accurately.Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View PostI work 3 miles from work so it never fully warms up, and I get about 16.5-18 mpg depending on if it's summer or winter. Around 20-21 hwy at 70mph.
The trucks instant mpg readout is at 17.1 mpg lol
Comment
-
Either way I much rather have a 6.0 then a 5.3.Originally posted by JC316 View PostAh, that sounds more on par. Oh and that truck lies it's ass off, that or they did a LOT of highway driving. I have only seen two computers that calculate MPG's accurately.
Did I mention I have access to hp tuners ?
320rwhp. 7.67 @ 90mph 1.7 60'
DD: 2004 GMC Sierra VHO 6.0 LQ9 324whp 350wtrq
Comment
-
You'll never notice the difference in a stock application. Either way, get an aluminum block (4x4 applications), and if it has a cylinder deactivation feature, turn that shit off.Originally posted by 91CoupeMike View PostEither way I much rather have a 6.0 then a 5.3.
Did I mention I have access to hp tuners ?ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh
Comment
-
I'm pretty sure the aluminum 6.0s only came in the vortechmax trucks in truck applications. L76s are expensive (2500+).Originally posted by YALE View PostYou'll never notice the difference in a stock application. Either way, get an aluminum block (4x4 applications), and if it has a cylinder deactivation feature, turn that shit off.
There are aluminum 5.3ls, though.Originally posted by BuzzoSome dudes jump out of airplanes, I fuck hookers without condoms.
sigpic
Comment
-
They came in a shitload of 2500's 4x4's. Don't overlook those.Originally posted by crapstang View PostI'm pretty sure the aluminum 6.0s only came in the vortechmax trucks in truck applications. L76s are expensive (2500+).
There are aluminum 5.3ls, though.ZOMBIE REAGAN FOR PRESIDENT 2016!!! heh
Comment
Comment