Originally posted by bluecollar
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Anyone sporting 65 or 70" TV?
Collapse
X
-
We got a Samsung 65 inch (not the curved one) at Xmas time. It's pretty fucken great watching 4K shit. Daredevil and House of Cards are pretty detailed! Well, all 4k stuff is, but it is pretty cool.Originally posted by CJ View PostWho in this thread actually owns a 4k tv?
I never watched anything in 3D until I got this tv, that is also pretty cool.
Leave a comment:
-
Hell, here's a 78" curved 4k for under 6 grand. that's not too bad
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16889355001
Leave a comment:
-
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...2E16889354213R
This is the one that I have in the living room. Honestly, it is clear enough for me. I'd like to go bigger at some point, but I haven't gotten super excited about 4k yet. Mine also has the Evolution Kit upgrade ability. So right now it has a quad core processor, but they should be coming out with the upgrade before too long. Depending on what it upgrades, I may purchase the kit. The curved screens are neat, but not cool enough to make me drop that much coin again just for some curves.
Leave a comment:
-
-
I try and explain this to people and they just dont understand. I sit 5 feet away from my 50 inch 4k. It's amazing for GAMES only. The streaming isn't true 4k. It's close but doesn't blow you away like the 4k formated rays will. We're talking like 100 or more GB per movie for Lord of the Rings or something similar.Originally posted by Ratt View Post
I have a friend who just bought (financed) a curved 55 Sammy 7900 series. He sits about 15+ feet from it. It IS soo shitty. He got it and will end up paying about 2800 for a 1400 dollar tv. Even though he bought it, he had no idea what 4k even was until I told him and had no idea that he couldn't get content easily. I told him he had to sit closer when content came out or its a waste and he told me I was crazy.
Anyway he's dumb but he loves it.
What is funny is I bought the upgraded chipset Sammy 50 4k that I have the weekend after for 800 lol. Only difference is mine is flat. I noticed black uniformity is pretty bad on the curved screens and mine almost looks like an OLED display after I calibrated it.Last edited by FunFordCobra; 06-25-2015, 11:25 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
No I have watched 1080 but don't see a huge difference in quality... at least that makes a difference to me. It makes sense but you may just disagree.Originally posted by jluv View PostHuh? That's like saying you don't think weed gets you any higher than cigarettes, but then admitting that you've never smoked it.
This is what I was referring to. The same concept applies to 720vs1080Originally posted by Ratt View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Huh? That's like saying you don't think weed gets you any higher than cigarettes, but then admitting that you've never smoked it.Originally posted by akfodysvn View PostI still have 720 tv's and never notice much difference. W
ith that said I never watch blueray movies or have ever thought they are worth the difference in price. I guess I am just pretty simple.
Also I haven't bought a new tv in a few yrs.
Leave a comment:
-
I don't expect to see 4k broadcasting for another 3-4 years, possibly 10 for local stations.
Leave a comment:
-
Im not holding my breath on 4k content being pretty mainstream until next year. Even with TV prices being low, the 4k content is pretty low. Im also happy with 1080p and dont think I need 4k.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: