Lawyer v. Insurance adjuster client

[Gear_Jammer]

This is the reason I don't represent insurance companies...

[David]

I must need to be one of those 2 animals to get this video.

[8mpg]

I must need to be one of those 2 animals to get this video.

x2

[Gear_Jammer]

I must need to be one of those 2 animals to get this video.

In essence, insurance companies want to hire attorneys to defend them when their insured has been sued and they are unwilling to pay anything to the other side (the Plaintiff) AND they don't want to spend any money on attorney's fees, despite the fact that they expect the attorney to work his A$$ off defending the case.

[BERNIE MOSFET]

Thought it was pretty clear. Facepalm is in order, I think.

[David]

In essence, insurance companies want to hire attorneys to defend them when their insured has been sued and they are unwilling to pay anything to the other side (the Plaintiff) AND they don't want to spend any money on attorney's fees, despite the fact that they expect the attorney to work his A$$ off defending the case.

Sounds like any client dealing with an attorney.

[bcoop]

Thought it was pretty clear. Facepalm is in order, I think.

What do you do for a living fake fish fucker?

[matts5.0]

those videos are fucking lame

[BERNIE MOSFET]

What do you do for a living fake fish fucker?

haha!

I guide companies through the process of certifying new parts for use in aircraft. I write reports, test plans, create and modify drawings, and whatever else is needed to walk everything through the FAA so our clients don't have to run that gauntlet. I have to be pretty familiar with federal regulations to be efficient.

It sounded familiar. Our clients like what we do, but don't like paying so much for it. I'm glad I'm not the one haggling over fees and work to be done, but I hear about it all the time.

[bcoop]

haha!

I guide companies through the process of certifying new parts for use in aircraft. I write reports, test plans, create and modify drawings, and whatever else is needed to walk everything through the FAA so our clients don't have to run that gauntlet. I have to be pretty familiar with federal regulations to be efficient.

It sounded familiar. Our clients like what we do, but don't like paying so much for it. I'm glad I'm not the one haggling over fees and work to be done, but I hear about it all the time.

Was just curious. You seem to be far more intelligent than 99% of the people that post here. lol

[Broncojohnny]

Was just curious. You seem to be far more intelligent than 99% of the people that post here. lol

That isn't saying much

[BERNIE MOSFET]

Was just curious. You seem to be far more intelligent than 99% of the people that post here. lol

It's just a ruse. I'm sure I'll be outed before long! Thanks though!

[Gear_Jammer]

Sounds like any client dealing with an attorney.

You'd be surprised. I have clients that tell me to prosecute or defend a case regardless of what it costs, they pay their bill on time and never complain. They do that because I've built up a good relationship with them and they know that I don't believe in over-billing clients. Granted, I've had a number of clients that have said they don't care about what it cost because it's a matter of principal, but those are the ones that usually end up not wanting to pay what they owe. I've learned that "it's a matter of principal" usually means problems in the future, so I watch their account very closely to make sure they are paying on time. I can't work for free...

[Hobie]

I must need to be one of those 2 animals to get this video.

x2

Seriously?

[Da Prez]

Lol, I thought it was funny but I work in claims department and deal with attorneys all day...