Originally posted by Darren M
View Post
What follows may be irrelevant, but its just my .02. I never liked bitcoin cash. It doesn't meet my criteria of "needs to exist". It brought little to the table. It was mainly supposed to be an "upgrade" to bitcoin. Since it could be mined in 4mb blocks instead of bitcoin's 2mb blocks. That is an upgrade, but still not really the upgrade that is needed. There are other coins that do everything bitcoin cash does, and they do it a lot better.
They lauded it as "the new bitcoin" when it has little to do with bitcoin. Its just another coin that started up. Looking at its price, there have to be people who have done well by investing in it. But it has been shady from the start. Even before its start, there were some very good questions as to why it was needed. I learned that all that "hard fork" talk was just a bunch on nonsense. The next time they start talking about forks, or hard forks, I won't be paying much attention unless I'm invested in bitcoin at the time. Even then, the new coin that comes as a result of the fork will be up against the original, the giant. Bitcoin. And good luck with that.
Bitcoin itself isn't going anywhere. So any "fork" basically just amounts to another coin startup, that seeks to use the bitcoin name to help it gain popularity. In my estimation without the ability to tack that name on to their "new and improved bitcoin", they'd be just another money coin that may very well fade out of existence eventually.
Also, look at the CEO. He looks like the classic badguy CEO from any movie. He kind of talks like one too. His haircut does not speak of him being a professional. Doesn't look like he's in very good health either. I don't trust him or bitcoin cash.
Again all just my humble .02
Leave a comment: