Originally posted by bulldog896
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
M16/AR15 Magwell
Collapse
X
-
If it were a $100 lower I'm with you I wouldn't want to go ginding on an old GM lower
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by David View PostI have mags for the 60s to 09. They all seem hit or miss. I think Im down to modifying the mags. Seems like machine work would be a pain in the ass and same paper may be a bit harsh.
Leave a comment:
-
I have mags for the 60s to 09. They all seem hit or miss. I think Im down to modifying the mags. Seems like machine work would be a pain in the ass and same paper may be a bit harsh.
Leave a comment:
-
try older 20 rounders in it I bet they all drop free (if memory serves) there was a variation change during the viet nam era guns that changed the magwell dimensions slightly (also a variation changing the outside dimensions which we all know)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pokulski-Blatz View PostChances of it being the magwell are slim. I think that the problem likely lies with shitty USGI mags.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View PostRight, that's one of the problem he's describing. Tight magwell isn't an easy fix. Check for burrs or casting flaws, but more than likely you're gonna live with it, or find a better fitting mag.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Pokulski-Blatz View PostWont solve the problem of the mag hanging up on the way out. That just makes it easier to seat the mag.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View PostJust differences in the stamping. I have a few I have to bang in, and I have a few I don't have to. I just bang everything in and problem solved! If you mill about .010" off the top of your mag catch, it should solve the problems.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: