Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Traded for M&P 15-22

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CJ
    replied
    Originally posted by bottlerocket View Post
    Shit, how? You casting your own .22 bullets and jacketing them with spent .22LR brass?
    I can get to about 11 cents a round.

    Leave a comment:


  • bottlerocket
    replied
    Originally posted by 5.0_CJ View Post
    Meh, I can get close.
    Shit, how? You casting your own .22 bullets and jacketing them with spent .22LR brass?

    Leave a comment:


  • CJ
    replied
    Originally posted by Trick Pony View Post
    Yes, except you can't shoot your AR for 2-3 cents a round.
    Meh, I can get close.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trick Pony
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr_Fiux View Post
    You crazy man. I love my 10/22... if i wanted to shoot an AR platform 22 i would be shooting my AR in 5.56.... its also a .22 caliber
    Yes, except you can't shoot your AR for 2-3 cents a round.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr_Fiux
    replied
    You crazy man. I love my 10/22... if i wanted to shoot an AR platform 22 i would be shooting my AR in 5.56.... its also a .22 caliber

    Leave a comment:


  • Trick Pony
    replied
    Originally posted by bottlerocket View Post
    Sounds fun too. I really enjoy just shooting mine offhand and doing some plinking. Bolt action really doesn't promote things like that
    True. I have a 60 year old Remington 550 for that and it shoots better than my 10/22 did.

    Leave a comment:


  • ceyko
    replied
    I never research 17 hmr before yesterday. Bad ass little round.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeFingerPete
    replied
    Originally posted by Chopped54 View Post
    The 17 or 22?

    The 17 is a shitload more accurate, but the 22 has almost 3 times the energy.

    I bought my .17 for hunting. I bought my 10/22 for cheap plinking.
    .17HMR (Model 93, also available in .22 wmr) vs .22lr (mark ii)

    Leave a comment:


  • Chopped54
    replied
    Originally posted by ThreeFingerPete View Post
    It obviously has more energy, and inherent accuracy due to much better quality ammunition and decent bullets (not lead).
    The 17 or 22?

    The 17 is a shitload more accurate, but the 22 has almost 3 times the energy.

    I bought my .17 for hunting. I bought my 10/22 for cheap plinking.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeFingerPete
    replied
    Originally posted by bottlerocket View Post
    To the 93? Thats pretty impressive. I thought the .17 was supposed to have a significant advantage over 22LR.
    It obviously has more energy, and inherent accuracy due to much better quality ammunition and decent bullets (not lead).

    The savage Mark II and the Model 93 are the LR / Magnum versions of the same rifle.

    The .3" group I posted a while back was shot with a bone stock Savage Mark II BVXP and bulk ammunition.

    Don't want a $1000 .5 MOA .22? Don't expect a semi auto.

    Leave a comment:


  • bottlerocket
    replied
    Originally posted by ThreeFingerPete View Post
    The savage mark ii (22lr) share similar accuracy.
    To the 93? Thats pretty impressive. I thought the .17 was supposed to have a significant advantage over 22LR.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThreeFingerPete
    replied
    Originally posted by bottlerocket View Post
    Sounds fun too. I really enjoy just shooting mine offhand and doing some plinking. Bolt action really doesn't promote things like that



    Apples to oranges... $0.29 per round for .17 isn't nearly as cost effective as .22LR. Might as well get an AR and start reloading at that price...
    The savage mark ii (22lr) share similar accuracy.

    Leave a comment:


  • bottlerocket
    replied
    Originally posted by Trick Pony View Post
    I sold mine and bought a Savage 93 BRJ in .22 WMR instead. Easy to shoot 1 hole groups at 50 yards and does pretty well at 100 if it's not windy too. Of course it's a bolt gun and not a semi but I have more fun with it just because it's so accurate. Like I said I'll probably buy a used 10/22 in the future that someone has already done up.
    Sounds fun too. I really enjoy just shooting mine offhand and doing some plinking. Bolt action really doesn't promote things like that

    Originally posted by Chopped54 View Post
    I have the Savage 93 in .17hmr and is easily one of the most accurate guns I have shot
    Apples to oranges... $0.29 per round for .17 isn't nearly as cost effective as .22LR. Might as well get an AR and start reloading at that price...

    Leave a comment:


  • Chopped54
    replied
    I have the Savage 93 in .17hmr and is easily one of the most accurate guns I have shot

    Leave a comment:


  • Trick Pony
    replied
    Originally posted by bottlerocket View Post
    I was in the same boat. I picked up a 10/22 carbine (wood stock, barrel band, etc) and while it was fun for a mag or two, the shit trigger and inconsistent accuracy were annoying. Spend a couple bucks on it and its a whole new gun (at least it feels like it). I love mine now and its as fun as any gun I own.
    I sold mine and bought a Savage 93 BRJ in .22 WMR instead. Easy to shoot 1 hole groups at 50 yards and does pretty well at 100 if it's not windy too. Of course it's a bolt gun and not a semi but I have more fun with it just because it's so accurate. Like I said I'll probably buy a used 10/22 in the future that someone has already done up.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X