With the threat of an AWB coming up...

[Ruffdaddy]

You don't need the money in your savings. You just want it.

100% correct and that supports neither point.

[Cooter]

And again...you don't need it. Just say you want it...and that there's not need in passing a law as an emotional reaction.

You don't need the money in your savings. You just want it.

[Ruffdaddy]

And again...you don't need it. Just say you want it...and that there's not need in passing a law as an emotional reaction.

[Ruffdaddy]

Wow everyone has their panties in a wad over this. I haw never said take the guns away...I simply said you dont need them. This believe is shared by most gun owners I know (most of which are educated...maybe that's the issue?).

I think that claiming to need and AR with 30+ rounds makes just as much sense as the thought that increasing gun laws will prevent newton massacres. Both extreme sides of this are complete morons.

I course I'm tired of the left for being ignorant about guns and the lack of a positive effect gun laws have, but I'm equally as tired of assholes buying all the fucking ammo, clips, and guns on credit because they think they'll be at war soon. Both are knee jerk reactions with bad consequences. And don't even get me started on the negative image this tacticool fad has given gun owners. All of the loopholes like the slide fire coupled with pushing the limits for no reason add fuel to the fire.

And Brandon go ahead an show me a thread I made asking for advice. The only thread I ever remember remotely close to that was a confirmed bad lot of WWB...

[inline 6]

Bout to add ruffdaddy to my ignore list.

[Brandon-k]

So a bunch of white trash can spray 30+ rounds at hogs...not a need

I think the most interesting thing about Ruffdaddy's argument is that he is a gun owner.

An ignorant gun owner at that. He's a typical douchebag who obviously knows what's best for us all. Look at his previous threads asking for gun advice. He has no idea what he is talking about....

Guns are for protection from enemies foreign and domestic. Your opinion about "need" matters about as much as a magazine ban does to crime. Not one fucking bit. Fact.

[HOOCBB]

I think the most interesting thing about Ruffdaddy's argument is that he is a gun owner.

I've had similar discussions with others that are also gun owners. Some people are just too damn stupid to understand.

[Shorty]

I think the most interesting thing about Ruffdaddy's argument is that he is a gun owner.

[HOOCBB]

Hahahaha god damn you're a moron.

First, I guarantee you don't have the onions to stand up against anyone coming to take your shit. You're on a tuck your tail like a beat dog.

Second, you really think you have a chance at defending against the array of autonomous weaponry with you lack of a sack and an AR?

Come try me, shithead.

[HarrisonTX]

All proposals I have seen would still prohibit that...

LOL. The sale of marijuana is prohibited. Does it not go on? Why is this a hard concept for you?

[Nash B.]

Why bring race into this?

Because he's ignorant.

[David]

Why don't we need it?

[71chevellejohn]

Why bring race into this?

[Nash B.]

So a bunch of white trash can spray 30+ rounds at hogs...not a need

Obviously your definition of need has more merit than anybody else's definition because facts.

[Cooter]

So a bunch of white trash can spray 30+ rounds at hogs...not a need

You should deposit all of your savings in my bank account. You aren't currently using it, so you obviously have no "need" for it.